Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/937,537

IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS AND LENS APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 05, 2024
Examiner
CHEN, CHIA WEI A
Art Unit
2637
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Canon Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
497 granted / 647 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
672
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 647 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Furuya (US 2008/0025712 A1). Claim 1, Furuya teaches an image pickup apparatus to which an optical apparatus is attachable (optical systems disposed, i.e., permanently attached, in a housing; paragraph 0003 and Fig. 1), the image pickup apparatus comprising: an image pickup element (image sensor 108; paragraph 0040); and a processor (central control circuit 300; paragraph 0040), wherein the optical apparatus including a first optical system (first imaging optical system 100; paragraph 0040), a second optical system (second imaging optical system 200; paragraph 0041), and a switching unit (switching between first imaging optical system and the second imaging optical system; paragraph 0051), optical axes of the first and second optical systems not being coinciding with each other (the first and second imaging optical systems cannot coexist in the same space and therefore the optical axes must also be different), the switching unit (central control circuit 300 controls the operation of the camera; paragraph 0042) being capable of switching between a first mode in which the first and second optical systems can be simultaneously driven (“simultaneous mode in which the first imaging optical system and the second imaging optical system are simultaneously driven;” paragraph 0046) and a second mode in which one of the first and second optical systems can be driven (“individual mode in which either the first imaging optical system or the second imaging optical system is individually driven;” paragraph 0048), wherein the processor is configured to cause a display unit to display a first display indicating a state in which the second mode is set in a case where the state of the switching unit is the second mode (central control circuit 300 prepares an indicator corresponding to each of the modes and displays the indicator on the display; paragraph 0050. See Fig. 15 of example screen display achieved in the individual drive mode; paragraph 0058). Claim 2, Furuya further teaches wherein the processor is configured to cause the display unit to display a second display indicating a state in which the first mode is set in a case where the state of the switching unit is the first mode (Fig. 12 shows an example screen display achieved in the simultaneous drive mode; paragraph 0057). Claim 3, Furuya further teaches wherein the first display includes information related to a difference between focus positions of the first and second optical systems (see Fig. 15 of display of the images acquired by the first and second imaging optical systems, the images inherently contain information related to focus positions of the first and second optical systems). Claim 4, Furuya further teaches wherein the display unit alternately displays, as the first display, a display including information related to an image pickup distance of one of the first and second optical systems (see zoom ratios of Fig. 15) and a display including information related to a difference between focus positions of the first and second optical systems (see Fig. 15 of display of the images acquired by the first and second imaging optical systems, the images of the first and second optical systems are displayed at alternate positions of the display screen). Claim 5, Furuya further teaches wherein the display unit alternately displays, as the first display, a display including information related to an image pickup distance of one of the first and second optical systems (see zoom ratios for each optical system in Fig. 15) and a display including information related to an image pickup distance of the other of the first and second optical systems (see Fig. 15 of display of the images acquired by the first and second imaging optical systems, the images of the first and second optical systems are displayed at alternate positions of the display screen). Claim 6, Furuya teaches an optical apparatus that is attachable to an image pickup apparatus (optical systems disposed, i.e., permanently attached, in a housing; paragraph 0003 and Fig. 1), the optical apparatus comprising: a first optical system (first imaging optical system 100; paragraph 0040); a second optical system (second imaging optical system 200; paragraph 0041) having an optical axis which does not coincide with an optical axis of the first optical system (the first and second imaging optical systems cannot coexist in the same space and therefore the optical axes must also be different); a switching unit (central control circuit 300 controls the operation of the camera; paragraph 0042) capable of switching between a first mode in which the first and second optical systems can be simultaneously driven (“simultaneous mode in which the first imaging optical system and the second imaging optical system are simultaneously driven;” paragraph 0046) and a second mode in which one of the first and second optical systems can be driven (“individual mode in which either the first imaging optical system or the second imaging optical system is individually driven;” paragraph 0048); and a processor configured to transmit information that requests display of a first display indicating a state in which the second mode is set to the image pickup apparatus in a case where a state of the switching unit indicates the second mode (central control circuit 300 prepares an indicator corresponding to each of the modes and displays the indicator on the display; paragraph 0050. See Fig. 15 of example screen display achieved in the individual drive mode; paragraph 0058). Claim 7, Furuya further teaches wherein the processor configured to transmit information that requests display of a second display indicating a state in which the first mode is set to the image pickup apparatus in a case where the state of the switching unit is the first mode (Fig. 12 shows an example screen display achieved in the simultaneous drive mode; paragraph 0057). Claim 8, Furuya further teaches wherein the processor transmits information related to a difference between focus positions of the first and second optical systems in a case where the state of the switching unit is the second mode (see Fig. 15 of display of the images acquired by the first and second imaging optical systems, the images inherently contain information related to focus positions of the first and second optical systems). Claim 9, Furuya further teaches wherein in a case where the state of the switching unit is the second mode, the processor alternately transmits information related to an image pickup distance of one of the first and second optical systems (see zoom ratios of Fig. 15) and information related to a difference between focus positions of the first and second optical systems (see Fig. 15 of display of the images acquired by the first and second imaging optical systems, the images of the first and second optical systems are displayed at alternate positions of the display screen). Claim 10, Furuya further teaches wherein in a case where the state of the switching unit is the second mode, the processor alternately transmits information related to an image pickup distance of one of the first and second optical systems (see zoom ratios of Fig. 15) and information related to an image pickup distance of the other of the first and second optical systems (see Fig. 15 of display of the images acquired by the first and second imaging optical systems, the images of the first and second optical systems are displayed at alternate positions of the display screen). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 attached. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHIAWEI A CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1707. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 12:00pm - 9:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sinh Tran can be reached at (571)272-7564. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHIAWEI CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604090
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589977
APPARATUS FOR INFORMATION COLLECTION, CARGO HANDLING METHOD, AND MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574622
IMAGE CAPTURE APPARATUS INCLUDING A MULTI-FUNCTION INTERCONNECT MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563298
SHAKE CORRECTION DEVICE AND IMAGING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556788
ELECTRONIC MODULE AND IMAGING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+19.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 647 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month