DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
This office action is in reply to amendment filed on July 10, 2026. Claims 1-21 are pending.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments, with respect to 35 U.S.C. 012 rejections have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the prior art on record does not teach comparing information stored in a local storage of the plurality of computing devices with a stored list of domains at both compromised and non-compromised devices.
Examiner would point out that, Hentunen US 2014/0310811 A1 teaches based on determining that the compromised computing device is compromised, causing the compromised computing device (i.e., client device 102a) and a non-compromised computing device (i.e., client device 102c) of the plurality of computing devices to compare information stored in a local storage (i.e., local cache) of the plurality of computing devices with a stored list of domains (i.e., stored mappings are communicated and stored locally at both clean and infected devices via marker detection. At time after a device is infected, comparison is made at both infected devices and non-infected device where the comparison is between IP address used by client device and IP address of previously stored mapping, paragraph 0136, 0139 and paragraphs 0147-0159). Examiner would further point out that the prior art on record teaches the claimed limitations and therefore the rejection is respectfully maintained.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hentunen US 2014/0310811 A1 [hereinafter Hentunen].
As per claims 1, 8 and 15, Hentunen teaches method comprising:
receiving, by a computing device, a message from a compromised computing device of a plurality of computing devices [paragraphs 0147-0159];
determining, based on the message, that the compromised computing device is compromised [paragraphs 0147-0148]; and
based on determining that the compromised computing device is compromised, causing the compromised computing device (i.e., client device 102a) and a non-compromised computing device (i.e., client device 102c) of the plurality of computing devices to compare information stored in a local storage (i.e., local cache) of the plurality of computing devices with a stored list of domains [paragraphs 0147-0159].
As per claims 2, 9 and 16, Hentunen further teaches the method further comprising causing each of the plurality of computing devices to receive an alert signal, the alert signal indicating that at least one of the plurality of computing devices is compromised [paragraphs 0147-0159].
As per claims 3, 10 and 17, Hentunen further teaches the method wherein determining that the compromised computing device is compromised is further based on a match between the information stored in the local storage and an item in the stored list of domains [paragraphs 0147-0159], and the method further comprising causing, based on a determination that the compromised computing device is compromised, an action [paragraphs 0147-0159].
As per claims 4, 11 and 18, Hentunen further teaches the method wherein determining that the compromised computing device is compromised further comprises determining that the compromised computing device is infected with one or more of malware, spyware, a virus, or a Trojan [paragraphs 0147-0159].
As per claims 5, 12 and 19, Hentunen further teaches the method wherein determining that the compromised computing device is compromised further comprises determining a pattern [paragraphs 0147-0159].
As per claims 6, 13 and 20, Hentunen further teaches the method wherein the pattern comprises a quantity of requests, by the compromised computing device, for an electronic file within a time window [paragraphs 0147-0159].
As per claims 7, 14 and 21, Hentunen further teaches the method wherein the message comprises an e-mail message [paragraphs 0147-0159].
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BEEMNET W DADA whose telephone number is (571)272-3847. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Mehrmanesh can be reached at 571-270-3351. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
BEEMNET W. DADA
Primary Examiner
Art Unit 2435
/BEEMNET W DADA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435
Prosecution Insights