Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/938,184

HYBRID IMAGE SENSORS WITH ON-CHIP IMAGE DEBLUR AND ROLLING SHUTTER DISTORTION CORRECTION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 05, 2024
Examiner
YODER III, CHRISS S
Art Unit
2638
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Omnivision Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
506 granted / 675 resolved
+13.0% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
690
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
46.1%
+6.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 675 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (lDS) submitted on November 18, 2025 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and has been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Garcia Capel et al. (US Pub. 2023/0230212). In regard to claim 1, note Garcia Capel discloses an image sensor, comprising an event driven sensing array including one or more event vision sensor (EVS) pixels, wherein each EVS pixel of the one or more EVS pixels is configured to capture event data corresponding to contrast information of light incident on the EVS pixel (paragraphs 0026-0029, and figure 1: 114), a pixel array including a plurality of CMOS image sensor (CIS) pixels arranged in one or more CIS pixel rows, wherein each CIS pixel of the plurality of CIS pixels is configured to capture CIS data corresponding to intensity of light incident on the CIS pixel(paragraphs 0025, 0030, and figure 1: 112), a rolling shutter distortion correction circuit configured to generate rolling-shutter-distortion-corrected image data by correcting the CIS data captured by the plurality of CIS pixels for rolling shutter distortion using the event data captured by the one or more EVS pixels (paragraphs 0036-0037, 0044-0047, and figure 1: 122; the image data is corrected for rolling shutter distortion using the event data), and a physical interface usable to output the rolling-shutter-distortion-corrected image data from the image sensor (paragraph 0070, figure 1: 140, and figure 6: 640). In regard to claim 12, note Garcia Capel discloses the rolling shutter distortion correction circuit is a deblur and rolling shutter distortion correction circuit, and wherein the deblur and rolling shutter distortion correction circuit is further configured to generate deblurred image data by deblurring the CIS data captured by the plurality of CIS pixels using the event data captured by the one or more EVS pixels (paragraphs 0036-0037, 0044-0047, and figure 1: 122; the image data is deblurred using the event data). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-11 and 13-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 16-33 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As for claim 16, the prior art does not teach or fairly suggest the use of an image sensor, comprising an event driven sensing array including one or more event vision sensor (EVS) pixels, wherein each EVS pixel of the one or more EVS pixels is configured to capture event data corresponding to contrast information of light incident on the EVS pixel, a pixel array including a plurality of CMOS image sensor (CIS) pixels, wherein each CIS pixel of the plurality of CIS pixels is configured to capture CIS data corresponding to intensity of light incident on the CIS pixel, and a rolling shutter distortion correction circuit including— a counter usable, for each EVS pixel of the one or more EVS pixels, to compute a running sum of events detected by the EVS pixel during a period of time extending from a start of an image frame to a start of an exposure period for one or more CIS pixels of the plurality of CIS pixels that correspond to the EVS pixel, and an integration buffer configured, for each EVS pixel of the one or more EVS pixels, to store the running sum corresponding to the EVS pixel, in conjunction with the other limitations of the claims. As for claim 20, the prior art does not teach or fairly suggest the use of a method of operating an image sensor, the method comprising capturing, during an exposure period corresponding to an image frame, CMOS image sensor (CIS) data using CIS pixels of one or more CIS pixel rows of a pixel array of the image sensor, wherein the CIS data corresponds to intensity of light incident on the CIS pixels over the exposure period, capturing, during a period of time extending between a start of the image frame and a start of the exposure period, event vision sensor (EVS) data using one or more EVS pixels of an event driven sensing array of the image sensor, wherein the EVS data includes events detected by the one or more EVS pixels during the period of time, and wherein each event represents temporal contrast of light incident on the one or more EVS pixels that exceeds a threshold, and correcting, using a rolling shutter distortion correction (RSDC) circuit of the image sensor, the CIS data for rolling shutter distortion (i) based on the EVS data and (ii) internally within the image sensor, in conjunction with the other limitations of the claims. As for claims 17-19 and 21-33, the reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter of these claims is due at least to their dependency upon allowable claims 16 and 20. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2017/0187961: note the use of an imaging device that performs rolling shutter distortion correction using motion sensor data. US 2023/0254579: note the use of an imaging device that performs image deblurring using event sensor data. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISS S YODER III whose telephone number is (571)272-7323. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lin Ye can be reached at (571) 272-7372. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISS S YODER III/Examiner, Art Unit 2638
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 05, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604118
IMAGE SENSING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604115
PHOTOELECTRIC CONVERSION DEVICE, MOVABLE APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593125
IMAGE SENSOR SUPPORTING AF FUNCTION AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574659
IMAGE SIGNAL PROCESSOR, IMAGE SENSOR, AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE IMAGE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563314
IMAGING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+21.7%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 675 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month