Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/938,676

ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, AND CONTROL PROGRAM

Final Rejection §101
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
Jul 04, 2013 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2013068381 +4 more
Examiner
JERABEK, KELLY L
Art Unit
2699
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NIKON Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
866 granted / 1016 resolved
+23.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 4m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
1025
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
46.4%
+6.4% vs TC avg
§102
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.0%
-33.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1016 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/27/2024 and 9/8/2025 in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claim 1 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,170,859. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Murata US 2015/0163441 discloses a stacked image sensor including a charge accumulation control unit. Peng et al. US 2013/0293752 discloses an imaging system including a stacked-chip image sensor including processing circuitry to determine accumulation times. Oike US 2012/0057056 discloses a solid-state imaging element including a plurality of stacked semiconductor layers. Itonaga et al . US 2011/0157445 discloses a semiconductor device including a plurality of stacked chips. Contacts Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kelly L. Jerabek whose telephone number is (571) 272-7312. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday (8:00 AM - 5:00 PM). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, George Eng can be reached at (571) 272-7495. The fax phone number for submitting all Official communications is (571) 273-7300. The fax phone number for submitting informal communications such as drafts, proposed amendments, etc., may be faxed directly to the Examiner at (571) 273-7312. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /KELLY L JERABEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2699
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Jun 15, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707140
USER INTERFACES FOR CAMERA MANAGEMENT
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701338
ANALOG-TO-DIGITAL CONVERTER, SENSOR AND APPARATUS
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12684885
IMAGE SENSOR AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE IMAGE SENSOR
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681262
LENS DRIVING UNIT, AND A CAMERA MODULE AND AN OPTICAL APPLIANCE INCLUDING THE SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684211
IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND HEAT DISSIPATION UNIT
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.4%)
4y 4m (~2y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1016 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month