Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/938,759

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD, TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
Jul 12, 2022 — continuation of PCTCN2022105095
Examiner
ABU ROUMI, MAHRAN Y
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
449 granted / 616 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§103
53.0%
+13.0% vs TC avg
§102
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
§112
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 616 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Convida et al. (hereinafter Convida) WO 2021/231816 A1. Regarding claim 1, Convida teaches a method for wireless communication, comprising: receiving, by a terminal device, first information (¶00238-¶00239; a high layer signaling may be used to convey this information, e.g. RRC parameter such as repetition_pattern, which may be signaled in SIB / as part of RACH-ConftgCommon. Also, such parameters may be preconfigured, provided in the specs."), wherein the first information is used to configure at least one of following: association periods in which resources for Physical Random Access Channel (PRACH) repetition are located, PRACH occasions in association periods in which resources for PRACH repetition are located, duration(s) in which resources for PRACH repetition are located, PRACH occasion(s) in duration(s) in which resources for PRACH repetition are located, preamble(s) associated with PRACH repetition, or a Random Access Channel (RACH) configuration dedicated to PRACH repetition (par. [00227]-[00233] "Exploiting the unused RO based on legacy PRACH configurations in one association period may not be enough to provide the desired coverage enhancement. Therefore, exploiting the unused ROs based on legacy PRACH configurations in multiple consecutive or non-consecutive association periods.", par. [00234] "FIG. 16 shows an example of repeating a PRACH transmission in the same RO across different association periods 1600. ", par. [00241], figures 16 & 17). Regarding claim 2, Convida teaches the method of claim 1, wherein, in case that the first information is at least used to configure the association periods in which the resources for PRACH repetition are located, the resources for PRACH repetition are located in M association periods, wherein each of the M association periods comprises at least one PRACH occasion for PRACH repetition, M is a positive integer, and M > 1 ([00234] FIG. 16 shows an example of repeating a PRACH transmission in the same RO across different association periods 1600. Alternatively, reduced capability NR devices may transmit PRACH repetitions across different consecutive or non-consecutive association periods 1601, 1602. Also [00239] association period can be used to carry PRACH repetition starting from the one that carried the first PRACH repetition) and so on. Also, the pattern may be provided in the form of a bitmap. For example, the bitmap 1001001001001001 corresponds to the pattern in FIG. 18. As mentioned above, this pattern may be applied for repetitions on ROs within association period and/or repetitions on RO across different association periods). Regarding claim 3, Convida teaches the method of claim 2, wherein, a number of the M association periods is less than or equal to a number of times of PRACH repetition (Fig. 16). Regarding claim 4, Convida teaches the method of claim 2, wherein, the PRACH occasions for PRACH repetition in the M association periods are associated with at least one synchronization signal block (SSB), wherein the at least one SSB at least comprises a target SSB determined by the terminal device (¶00226-¶00232; based on the selected SSB…). Regarding claim 5, Convida teaches the method of claim 2, wherein, a number of the M association periods is determined based on at least one of following: a number of times of PRACH repetition, or a number of time division PRACH occasions associated with one SSB in the association periods (¶00229-¶00232). Regarding claim 6, Convida teaches the method of claim 2, wherein, the PRACH occasions for PRACH repetition in the M association periods are preconfigured or stipulated by protocol (¶00239; A high layer signaling may be used to convey this information, e.g. RRC parameter such as repetition _pattern, which may be signaled in SIB I as part of RACH-ConftgCommon. Also, such parameters may be preconfigured, provided in the specs. [00240] Furthermore, the needed coverage enhancement level may be associated with the repetition pattern, not only with the number of repetitions. As mentioned above, each coverage enhancement level may be associated with the repetition configurations which may include the number of repetitions, and the repetition pattern as well. Table 11 shows an example of such configuration. This table may be preconfigured, provided in the specs, or it may be provided by high layer signaling to indicate thresholds on RSRP, i.e., bo, bi and b2, and/or the repetition pattern for each coverage enhancement level). Regarding claim 7, Convida teaches the method of claim 6, wherein, at least one time division PRACH occasion associated with one SSB in an association period is preconfigured or stipulated by protocol for PRACH repetition (¶00239; A high layer signaling may be used to convey this information, e.g. RRC parameter such as repetition _pattern, which may be signaled in SIB I as part of RACH-ConftgCommon. Also, such parameters may be preconfigured, provided in the specs. [00240] Furthermore, the needed coverage enhancement level may be associated with the repetition pattern, not only with the number of repetitions. As mentioned above, each coverage enhancement level may be associated with the repetition configurations which may include the number of repetitions, and the repetition pattern as well. Table 11 shows an example of such configuration. This table may be preconfigured, provided in the specs, or it may be provided by high layer signaling to indicate thresholds on RSRP, i.e., bo, bi and b2, and/or the repetition pattern for each coverage enhancement level). Claims 8-14 are substantially similar to the above claims, thus the same rationale applies. Regarding claim 15, Convida teaches the terminal device of claim 8, wherein, in case that the first information is at least used to configure the duration(s) in which the resources for PRACH repetition are located and/or the PRACH occasion(s) in the duration(s) in which the resources for PRACH repetition are located, the resources for PRACH repetition are located in at least one duration, wherein each of the at least one duration comprises at least one PRACH occasion for PRACH repetition (¶00232 & ¶0240 & Table 11. Also see par. [00227]-[00233] "Exploiting the unused RO based on legacy PRACH configurations in one association period may not be enough to provide the desired coverage enhancement. Therefore, exploiting the unused ROs based on legacy PRACH configurations in multiple consecutive or non-consecutive association periods.", par. [00234] "FIG. 16 shows an example of repeating a PRACH transmission in the same RO across different association periods 1600. ", par. [00241], figures 16 & 17). Regarding claim 16, Convida teaches the terminal device of claim 8, wherein, the first information comprises feature combination element information associated with PRACH repetition, wherein the feature combination element information is used to configure at least one of following: the association periods in which the resources for PRACH repetition are located, the PRACH occasions in the association periods in which the resources for PRACH repetition are located, the duration(s) in which the resources for PRACH repetition are located and the PRACH occasion(s) in the duration(s), or preamble(s) associated with PRACH repetition (¶00240-¶00241 & Table 11. Also see claim 1). Claims 17-20 are substantially similar to the above claims, thus the same rationale applies. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MAHRAN ABU ROUMI whose telephone number is (469)295-9170. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Emmanuel Moise can be reached at 571-272-3865. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. MAHRAN ABU ROUMI Primary Examiner Art Unit 2455 /MAHRAN Y ABU ROUMI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2455
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750416
DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING FRAMEWORK
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744723
TELEPHONY DELAY TOLERANT NETWORK SYSTEM
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739302
INDUSTRIAL WIRELESS SYSTEM, ROOT NODE AND PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC CONTROLLER
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739311
Method and System for Enforcing Governance Across Multiple Content Repositories Using a Content Broker
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726324
MULTI-TTI MULTI-MCS SCHEDULING DCI TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.6%)
3y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 616 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month