Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/938,844

PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR PROCESSING INSTRUCTIONS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
May 22, 2024 — CN 202410642505.1
Examiner
FAHERTY, COREY S
Art Unit
2183
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Beijing Eswin Computing Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
737 granted / 924 resolved
+24.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
945
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
44.3%
+4.3% vs TC avg
§102
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 924 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the reply filed on 12/31/2025. Claims 1, 4-5, 8-12, and 15-20 are pending in the application and have been examined. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1, 4-5, 8-12, and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims recite the limitations “first-stage pipelining”, “second-stage pipelining”, “third-stage pipelining”, and “fourth-stage pipelining”. The meaning of these terms is indefinite, as the terminology is inconsistent with that normally used in the art and no description of the terms can be found in the specification. If the terms are simply intended to refer to stages of a pipeline, applicant should clarify this and use language consistent with the normal meaning of these terms. Claim 1 recites the limitation “the second-stage pipelining is a pipelining except the first-stage pipelining in the multi-stage pipelining”. Claims 5, 12, 16, and 19 recite similar limitations. It is unclear what a “pipelining” is in the context of this limitation. Is it simply a different word to describe a pipeline? Is it a stage of a pipeline? Appropriate clarification is required. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/31/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the claim terminology is clearly defined in the specification, but the cited portions of the specification do not clarify the intended scope of the terms. The argument is therefore not persuasive. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Corey Faherty whose telephone number is (571)270-1319. The examiner can normally be reached weekdays between 7:30 and 4:00 ET, with every other Friday off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jyoti Mehta can be reached at (571) 270-3995. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COREY S FAHERTY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2183
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 31, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681806
METHOD TO RESET CONFIGURABLE UNITS IN A RECONFIGURABLE PROCESSOR
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681724
SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS FOR CHAINED FUSED MULTIPLY ADD
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681725
Operand Selection Circuitry
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12657027
STALLING AN INSTRUCTION FETCH OPERATION IMPACTED BY A HAZARD WITHOUT STALLING ANOTHER INSTRUCTION FETCH OPERATION NOT IMPACTED BY THE HAZARD
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650841
CIRCUITRY AND METHODS FOR CAPABILITY INFORMED PREFETCHES
4y 2m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+3.8%)
3y 5m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 924 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month