Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/939,036

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEPLOYMENT OF ELECTRIC-BASED FRACTURING TOOLS IN VERTICAL WELLS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Examiner
BATES, ZAKIYA W
Art Unit
3674
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Eden Geopower Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
1151 granted / 1292 resolved
+37.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -3% lift
Without
With
+-2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1315
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§112
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1292 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group II (claims 11-21) in the reply filed on 11/17/25 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the term “are disclosed” is stated in lines 1-2. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Applicant is reminded of the proper language and format for an abstract of the disclosure. The abstract should be in narrative form and generally limited to a single paragraph on a separate sheet within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. The abstract should describe the disclosure sufficiently to assist readers in deciding whether there is a need for consulting the full patent text for details. The language should be clear and concise and should not repeat information given in the title. It should avoid using phrases which can be implied, such as, “The disclosure concerns,” “The disclosure defined by this invention,” “The disclosure describes,” etc. In addition, the form and legal phraseology often used in patent claims, such as “means” and “said,” should be avoided. Claim Objections Claims 11-21 are objected to because of the following informalities: the preamble of independent claim 11 recites a “method of electric-based fracturing” in line 1. However, the claim does not have any steps of such fracturing within claim 11 or any depending claims. The preamble should be amended to recite - -method of providing a high voltage cable for use in fracturing- - , (or use in a wellbore), or something similar describing the actual claimed method steps. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11-16, and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by MOENY (AU 2013286589). With respect to claim 11, MOENY discloses a method of electric-based fracturing [0003], [0078], [0267], the method comprising: providing a high voltage cable 510 comprising first, second, and third cable segments (Fig. 52- a set of segments 524 within 522 is shown for simplicity); coupling a power source 518 and a proximal portion of the first cable segment using a proximal connector; coupling a distal portion of the first cable segment and a proximal portion of the second cable segment using a first intermediate connector; coupling a distal portion of the second cable segment and a proximal portion of the third cable segment using a second intermediate connector; and coupling a distal portion of the third cable segment and an electrical stimulation tool 512 using a distal connector (Fig. 52- a set of connectors 528, 530 within 526 is shown for simplicity). See particularly Figs. 51-53, [0285-0300]. With respect to claim 12, MOENY further teaches comprising dispensing at least a portion of the second cable segment using a cable dispenser [00287], [0296]. With respect to claim 13, MOENY further teaches comprising selectively connecting the first intermediate connector to the distal portion of the first cable segment and the proximal portion of the second cable segment while the second cable segment is supported on the cable dispenser [00287], [0296]. With respect to claim 14, MOENY further teaches comprising actuating an actuator to rotate a rotatable spool of the cable dispenser [00287], [0296]. With respect to claim 15, MOENY further teaches comprising adjusting a position of the electrical stimulation tool within a wellbore by actuating the actuator to rotate the rotatable spool [00287], [0296]. With respect to claim 16, MOENY further teaches comprising positioning a majority of the third cable segment within a distal portion of a drill string 522. With respect to claim 21, MOENY further teaches comprising providing electrical power from the high voltage cable to the electrical stimulation tool, and further comprising transferring the electrical power from the electrical stimulation tool to a surrounding environment in a wellbore [0003], [0078], [0267]. Claim(s) 11, 17-21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by LEON ET AL (US 2014/0060814 cited by applicant). With respect to claim 11, LEON ET AL discloses a method of electric-based fracturing [0016], the method comprising: providing a high voltage cable 42 comprising first, second, and third cable segments ( Fig. 1- a set of segments 26, 28, 30 is shown for simplicity); coupling a power source and a proximal portion of the first cable segment using a proximal connector; coupling a distal portion of the first cable segment and a proximal portion of the second cable segment using a first intermediate connector; coupling a distal portion of the second cable segment and a proximal portion of the third cable segment using a second intermediate connector; and coupling a distal portion of the third cable segment and an electrical stimulation tool 2 using a distal connector ( Fig. 1- a set of connectors 38, 40 is shown for simplicity). See particularly Fig.1, [0016-0024]. With respect to claim 17, LEON ET AL further teaches comprising expanding an isolation mechanism 20, 22 from a retracted configuration spaced from an interior surface of a wellbore to an expanded configuration in contact with the interior surface of the wellbore. With respect to claim 18, LEON ET AL further teaches comprising physically and electrically isolating a lower portion of the wellbore that is downhole from an upper portion of the wellbore when the isolation mechanism is in the expanded configuration (via 20, 22). With respect to claim 19, LEON ET AL further teaches comprising operatively coupling the isolation mechanism 20, 22 and the electrical stimulation tool to a non-conductive distal portion of the drill string. With respect to claim 20, LEON ET AL further teaches comprising passing the high voltage cable through a side entry sub of the drill string [0023]. With respect to claim 21, LEON ET AL further teaches comprising providing electrical power from the high voltage cable to the electrical stimulation tool, and further comprising transferring the electrical power from the electrical stimulation tool to a surrounding environment in a wellbore [0016], [0017, [0024]. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. CA 2846201 teaches a method for generating high-pressure pulses in a dielectric medium to generate fractures in a subterranean reservoir, the method comprising: providing a wellbore in fluid communication with a producing zone of a hydrocarbon bearing formation; positioning an electrode assembly within the wellbore in a dielectric medium, the electrode assembly having a first electrode and a second electrode that is disposed radially outward from the first electrode such that a gap is defined therebetween; and delivering an electric current pulse to the electrode assembly, the electric current pulse having a length of time greater than 100 microseconds, such that an electric arc is formed between the first electrode and second electrode, thereby producing a sufficient pressure pulse in the dielectric medium to induce or extend fractures in the hydrocarbon bearing formation. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZAKIYA W BATES whose telephone number is (571)272-7039. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am - 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Doug Hutton can be reached at 5712724137. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZAKIYA W BATES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3674 1/26/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595732
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETERMINING DEFORMATION OF A TOOL STRING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590029
FILLING MATERIAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590524
Automated Detection of Plug and Perforate Completions, Wellheads and Wellsite Operation Status
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590522
VISCOELASTIC SURFACTANTS FOR ACID DIVERSION IN DOWNHOLE OPERATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584369
SEALING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (-2.6%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1292 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month