Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/939,088

IMPLANT AND COVERING METHODS AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Examiner
LAWSON, MATTHEW JAMES
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Spinol Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
795 granted / 1081 resolved
+21.5% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1125
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1081 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: Applicant uses the phrase “the at least covering” in line 17. This should read “the at least one covering”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: Applicant uses the phrase “a a plurality” in lines 1-2. This should read “a plurality”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 37 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 37 ends with two periods at the end instead of a single period. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 32 and 34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 32, Applicant recites “the deployed configuration in which the plurality of protrusions are positioned close to the body of the implant and the deployed configuration in which the plurality of protrusions extend outward from the body to facilitate prevention of leakage of biological material and/or to resist displacement of the implant from its deployed position within the portion of the biological anatomy.” However, these limitations are found in lines 5-8 of independent claim 1, from which claim 32 depends. The examiner suggests amending the claim to recite “wherein the plurality of protrusions are configurable between an insertion configuration in which the plurality of protrusions are positioned close to the body of the implant and the deployed configuration Amending the claim in this manner would overcome the rejection of record and remove the redundancy/duplicity of the claim. Regarding claim 34, Applicant recites: “the deployed configuration in which the plurality of protrusions extend outward from the body to facilitate prevention of leakage of nucleus pulpous material from the intervertebral disc and/or to resist displacement of the implant from its deployed position within the annulus.” However, these limitations are found in lines 5-8 of independent claim 1, from which claim 34 depends. The examiner suggests amending the claim to recite “wherein the plurality of protrusions are configurable between an insertion configuration in which the plurality of protrusions are positioned close to the body of the implant and the deployed configuration Amending the claim in this manner would overcome the rejection of record and remove the redundancy/duplicity of the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 25-26, 32-34 and 37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Drori et al. (US 2013/0338778). Regarding claim 1, Drori et al. disclose an implant (figures 1-4B) configured for insertion into a defect in an annulus of an intervertebral disc (figures 1C-1D, 5A-5D, the implant comprising a body (see figure below) having a proximal end (see figure below) and a distal end (see figure below), the body extending along a longitudinal axis (80) from the proximal end to the distal end; and a plurality of protrusions (70) configured to extend outward from the body in a deployed configuration (figures 1A-3B) when inserted into the defect in the annulus to resist leakage of nucleus pulpous material and/or to improve resistance to displacement of the implant (¶85, ¶87, ¶92); and a plurality of ribs (30) each having a first end (150, figure 1A) coupled to the proximal end of the body, the plurality of ribs having at least one covering coupled thereto, wherein each of the plurality of ribs extend from the proximal end of the body in a direction towards the distal end of the body to a second end (160, figure 1A) of each respective rib in a closed configuration (figure 4A-4B) so that the second end of each respective rib has a first distance from the body, and wherein each of the plurality ribs extends outwards from the body in an open position (figure 1A, 3A) such that the second end of each respective rib has a second distance from the body that is greater than the respective first distance to expand the at least covering is positioned when the implant is deployed in the annulus (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B). Regarding claim 2, Drori et al. disclose wherein the at least one covering comprises a a plurality of sheets (¶93 “additionally deployed on the proximal portion”), each of the plurality of sheets coupled to a first and a second of the plurality of ribs (via 440’s openings, figures 3C-3D, ¶92). Regarding claim 25, Drori et al. disclose the at least one covering comprises a one or more sheets of fabric composed of a polymer, synthetic material, a biological substance and/or is based on human tissue (¶92). Regarding claim 26, Drori et al. disclose the at least one covering comprises flexible and/or conformable fabric material (¶92). Regarding claim 30, Drori et al. disclose the at least one covering is configurable between an insertion configuration (figures 4A-4B) suitable for insertion into the portion of the biological anatomy and a deployed configuration (figures 1C-1d, 3A-3B) configured to facilitate prevention of leakage of biological nucleus pulpous material and/or to resist displacement of the implant (¶92). Regarding claim 32, Drori et al. disclose the plurality of protrusions are configurable between an insertion configuration in which the plurality of protrusions are positioned close to the body of the implant (figures 4A-4B) and the deployed configuration in which the plurality of protrusions extend outward from the body to facilitate prevention of leakage of biological material and/or to resist displacement of the implant from its deployed position within the portion of the biological anatomy (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B, ¶92). Regarding claim 33, Drori et al. disclose the at least one covering is coupled to the plurality of protrusions such that transitioning the plurality of protrusions from the insertion configuration to the deployed configuration causes the at least one covering to transition from the insertion configuration to the deployed configuration (figures 3A-3B). Regarding claim 34, Drori et al. disclose the plurality of protrusions (70) are configurable between an insertion configuration (figures 4A-4B) in which the plurality of protrusions are positioned close to the body of the implant (figures 4A-4B) and the deployed configuration (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B) in which the plurality of protrusions extend outward from the body to facilitate prevention of leakage of nucleus pulpous material from the intervertebral disc and/or to resist displacement of the implant from its deployed position within the annulus (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B, ¶92). Regarding claim 37, Drori et al. disclose an implant configured for insertion into a defect in an annulus of an intervertebral disc, the implant comprising a body (see figure below) having a proximal end (see figure below) and a distal end (see figure below), the body extending along a longitudinal axis (80) from the proximal end to the distal end; and a plurality of protrusions (70) configured to extend outward from the body in a deployed configuration (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B) when inserted into the defect in the annulus to resist leakage of nucleus pulpous material and/or to improve resistance to displacement of the implant (¶85, ¶87, ¶92); and a plurality of ribs (30) each having a first end (150, figure 1A) coupled to the distal end of the body, the plurality of ribs having at least one covering (410, figures 3A-3D) coupled thereto, wherein each of the plurality of ribs extend from the distal end of the body in a direction towards the proximal end of the body to a second end (160, figure 1A) of each respective rib in a closed configuration (figures 4A-4B) so that the second end of each respective rib has a first distance (figures 4A-4B) from the body, and wherein each of the plurality ribs extends outwards from the body in an open position (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B) such that the second end of each respective rib has a second distance (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B) from the body that is greater than the respective first distance to expand the at least covering when the implant is deployed in the annulus (figures 1C-1D, 3A-3B). PNG media_image1.png 568 353 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW JAMES LAWSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7375. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 6:30-3:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anita Coupe can be reached at 571-270-3614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW J LAWSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599487
TOOLS AND IMPLANTS FOR LATERAL DISC REPLACEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588953
DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NATURAL FEATURE TRACKING OF SURGICAL TOOLS AND OTHER OBJECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588914
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation System and Methods for Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582753
Systems and Methods for Forming An Antimicrobial Orthopedic Implant
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12569314
MEDICAL DEVICES FOR AIRWAY MANAGEMENT AND METHODS OF PLACEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.2%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1081 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month