Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/939,360

IMAGING LENS, IMAGING DEVICE, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
Nov 30, 2023 — JP 2023-202504
Examiner
MEDICH, ANGELA MARGOT
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
396 granted / 590 resolved
-0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
620
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 590 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-14 are currently pending in the present application. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The IDSs dated 06 November 2024 and 20 February 2025 were considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re: claim 1, the meaning of the limitation “low thickness deviation ratio” is unclear. The meaning is unclear because the specification does not provide some standard or range of values that are deemed to be “low’” (see MPEP § 2173.05.I). For the purpose of examining the present claim, the limitation has been interpreted as if it were deleted. Re: claims 2-14, because they depend upon claim 1, they are likewise rejected. Re: claim 8, the meaning of the limitation “an optical length is denoted by OAL” is unclear. The meaning is unclear because the same variable “OAL” is recited in claim 7 as meaning “total length of an optical system.” For the purpose of examining the present claim, the limitation has been construed as meaning “total length of an optical system” so that it is consistent with how claim 7 defines “OAL.” Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-14 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding independent claim 1, prior art reference Chen (US 20200393653), now made of record, discloses a first lens 910 (Fig. 17), a second lens 920, a third lens 930, and a fourth lens 940 disposed in order from an object side (Fig. 17, where the object side is to the left of the apparatus); wherein the first lens 910 is a positive lens (para. 267) having a convex surface facing the object side (para. 267), the second lens 920 is a positive or negative lens (para. 268 discloses positive) having an inflection point on at least one surface with a low thickness deviation ratio (inflection point disclosed in para. 268), the third lens 930 is a positive lens (para. 269) having a convex surface facing an image plane side (para. 269) and an inflection point on a lens peripheral portion (para. 269, where Fig. 17 discloses location on peripheral portion), the fourth lens 940 is a negative lens (para. 270) having a concave surface on an image plane side (para. 270) and an inflection point (para. 270). However, Chen does not explicitly disclose an aperture stop between the first and second lenses; that the inflection point of the fourth lens is on the periphery; and that Conditions (1) and (2) are satisfied, where Condition 1 is {0.45 < |f/f1| < 0.70} and Condition 2 is {0.30 < |f4/f1| < 0.50}, when a focal length of the first lens is denoted by f1, a focal length of the fourth lens is denoted by f4, and a focal length of an entire optical system is denoted by f (Chen discloses that f = 7.91, f1 = 5.82, and f4 = -6.95. Substituting these values into Conditions 1 and 2 yields: [Wingdings font/0xE0]f/f1 = 7.91 / 5.82 = 1.36 which is outside the claimed range, and [Wingdings font/0xE0] f4 / f1 = -6.95 / 7.91 = 0.88 which is outside the claimed range). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Figure 17 of reference Lin (US20240012223), now made of record, discloses positive first and third lenses, negative second and fourth lenses, a stop between the first and second lens, and where the second, third and fourth lenses have inflection points. Figures 1 and 5 of reference Wang (US20230132957), now made of record, disclose first through fourth lenses with the second, third, and fourth lenses having inflection points. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANGELA MEDICH whose telephone number is (313)446-4819. The examiner can normally be reached M-T & Th-F 10:00 AM - 7:00 PM ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANGELA M. MEDICH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769095
IMAGE PICKUP APPARATUS THAT PERFORMS GIMBAL CONTROL
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764292
BLANKET TRANSISTOR ARRAY FOR ELECTROPHORETIC COATINGS AND METHODS THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12730412
Watch Component, Watch, And Method For Manufacturing Watch Component
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730319
OPTICAL MODULE AND HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724188
OPTICAL FILM AND OPTICAL SYSTEM
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+19.6%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 590 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month