Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/939,380

LOAD BALANCING FOR WEIGHTED EQUAL COST MULTI-PATH (ECMP)

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Examiner
BARRY, LANCE LEONARD
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
335 granted / 395 resolved
+26.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
422
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.3%
-10.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 395 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 follows. Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Independent claims 1, 8, and 15 recite computing respective cumulative data carrying capacities, computing a cumulative capacity comparison value, comparing the cumulative capacity comparison value with at least a subset of the cumulative data carrying capacities, and selecting a specific network path. Other than reciting a system, computing devices, computer readable media, first and second network nodes, and hardware logic, nothing in the claims precludes the steps from practically being performed in the mind or using mathematics or both. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application. In particular, the claims recite the aforementioned elements at a high-level of generality, amounting to no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using generic computer components. “[O]ver which to forward the received network packet from the first network node towards the second network node” is merely an intended use. Accordingly, the additional elements do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application because they does not impose any meaningful limits on practicing the abstract idea. Therefore, the claims are directed towards an abstract idea. The claims do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. As aforementioned regarding the failure to integrate the abstract idea into a practical application, the additional elements amount to no more than mere instructions to apply the exception using generic computer components. Mere instructions to apply an exception using generic computer components cannot provide an inventive concept. The dependent claims merely set forth additional details of the abstract idea and also fail to recite additional elements sufficient to integrate the abstract idea into a practical application or amounting to significantly more than the judicial exception. Therefore, claims 1-21 are patent ineligible. N.B. As suggested during the interview on February 12, 2026, adding the operation of using the selected network path to forward the received network packet from the first network node towards the second network node as in step 414 of Figure 4Awould integrate the abstract idea into a practical application and overcome the aforementioned rejection. Other Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to the instant disclosure. For example, US 20190028382 optimizes packet flow among virtualized servers (¶ 0001). Conclusion Any response to this Office action containing amended or newly presented claims should specifically point out support in the original disclosure for the new or amended claims. See MPEP § 714.02 and § 2163.06 (“Applicant should specifically point out the support for any amendments made to the disclosure.”). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Lance Leonard Barry whose telephone number is (571) 272-5856. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 730-1630. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to email the Examiner. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached on 571-272-4001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LANCE LEONARD BARRY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 12, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12580993
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DISCOVERING USER PLANE FUNCTION UPF IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12568149
DYNAMIC PLACEMENT OF SERVICES CLOSER TO ENDPOINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562792
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CSI CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556610
Devices and Methods for Location-Dependent Prioritized Communication
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12550218
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR ENABLING SECONDARY CELL GROUP (SCG) SUSPENSION AND RESUMPTION OR PRIMARY SECONDARY CELL (PSCELL) DEACTIVATION AND ACTIVATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 395 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month