Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/939,405

STEERING APPARATUS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
Nov 07, 2023 — JP 2023-189904
Examiner
HAILE, BENYAM
Art Unit
2688
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
445 granted / 721 resolved
At TC average
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
775
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
56.8%
+16.8% vs TC avg
§102
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 721 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
/DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1, 5-8 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1, 6, 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cholasta [US 20190181860] in view of [US 20190181860]. As to claim 1. Cholasta discloses A steering apparatus comprising: a steering wheel, [0002] implemented in a steering wheel; and a sensor unit, [fig. 1, 0012] sensor device 100, configured to detect contact of a human body with the steering wheel, [fig. 5, 0002, 0026] steering wheel hands-off-detection, or approach of the human body causing a change in an electronic capacitance of an electrode provided in the steering wheel, wherein the sensor unit comprises: the electrode, [fig. 1, 0014] electrode 114; a measuring device, [fig. 1, 0012] microcontroller 120, configured to measure the electrostatic capacitance of the electrode, [0012, 0035] measure ca[acutance voltage of the capacitive touch sense electrode; a switching element, [fig. 1, 0014] switch 122, configured to switch the electrode between a first state in which the electrode is grounded and a second state in which the electrode is not grounded, [fig. 1, 0014] first state connected to the ground through contact “1” and a second state connected to other contacts that is not ground; a microprocessor, [fig. 1, 0012] central processing unit 124, configured to perform controlling the switching element, [0015], a capacitive element, [fig. 1, 0012] capacitor 112, wherein the second state includes a third state in which a voltage from a predetermined power source is applied to the electrode through the switching element, [fig. 1, 0014] a state wherein the electrode 114 is connected to supply voltage Vref through contact “3”, and a fourth state in which the electrode is connected with the capacitive element through the switching element, [fig. 1, 0016] a state wherein the electrode 114 is connected to capacitor 112, the switching element switches the electrode to the first state, the third state, and the fourth state, based on a control signal from the microprocessor, [0015], an electric charge of the electrode is accumulated in the third state, [0017], is moved to the capacitive element in the fourth state, [0016], and is discharged to a ground line in the first state, [0014], and the microprocessor is configured to perform: the controlling including, while a voltage from the predetermined power source is repeatedly applied to the electrode, [0015-0017] the electrode is repeatedly connected to the power source Vrefh, repeating a first operation of switching the electrode from the third state to the fourth state, [0017] switch 122 placed from the third terminal to the second terminal once the capacitor 113 is discharged, and a second operation of switching the electrode from the fourth state to the third state, [0017] switch 122 placed from the second terminal to the third terminal to charge the capacitor 113, and outputting the control signal to the switching element such that, at least in the second operation, the electrode in the fourth state is switched to the first state and thereafter switched to the third state, [0015-0117] the switch 122 is cycled through the three states. Cholasta fails to disclose wherein the voltage is a pulse voltage, wherein the repeating is in accordance with a period of the voltage, Takahata teaches a grasp detection device provided in a steering wheel, [fig. 1, abs.], comprising an electrode 60 provided on a steering handle 2, [fig. 2, 0029], and a pulse power source 63, [fig. 2, 0032]; wherein a drive circuit controls switching of switches 65, 66 to connect the electrode 60 to the power source 63, ground, or capacitance measurer 68 by connecting the electrode 60 to the capacitor 67 [fig. 2, 0033, 0039]; wherein the switching is performed based on the period of the pulse power supply, [0036-0038]. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Cholasta with that of Talahata so that the system can measure the number of pulses between the change in capacitance of capacitor 67 to indirectly measure the change in capacitance, reducing the processing power needed. As to claim 6. Cholasta fails to explicitly disclose The steering apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising the physical characteristics of the steering wheel. However, Takahata teaches a grasp detection device provided in a steering wheel, [fig. 1, abs.]; wherein the steering wheel comprises: a rim portion having an annular shape, [fig. 1, 0023] rim 20; a hub portion provided on an inner side of the rim portion, [fig. 1, 0023] hub 23; and a spoke portion extending from the hub portion in a radial direction of the rim portion and connecting the hub portion with an inner circumferential portion of the rim portion, [fig. 1, 0023] spokes 25, and the sensor unit is disposed in a function switch unit disposed on the spoke portion, [0029]. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Cholasta with that of Talahata as nothing but implementing the steering wheel using the basic physical characteristics that can allow for the purpose of a circular steering when to be used to turn a shaft attached to the wheels. As to claim 7. Cholasta discloses The steering apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the spoke portion is provided on a left side and a right side in a front view from a driver seat between the rim portion to be gripped by an occupant, [fig. 1, 0025], and the hub portion, and the sensor unit is disposed on the spoke portion on the left side and the spoke portion on the right side, [0029], and is also disposed in together with a component part for performing at least one operation of a vehicle information operation or a driving support function operation in the function switch unit, [0026]. Claim(s) 5, 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cholasta in view of Takahta, as applied to claim 1 above, further in view of Seok et al. [US 20190210630]. As to claim 5. The combination of Cholasta and Takahta fails to disclose The steering apparatus according to claim 1, wherein in the sensor unit, at least the switching element, the capacitive element, and the measuring device are configured on an electronic board, and at least one of signal line patterns respectively connecting the switching element with the electrode, the switching element with the predetermined power source, and the switching element with the capacitive element is formed in close proximity to the ground line. Seok teaches a steering wheel and method for controlling the same comprising a sensor integrated circuit 131 mounted on a printed circuit board 130, [fig. 1, 0049], comprising wiring part to electrically connect the sensor components including electrodes on the board, [0061]. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of the combination of Cholasta and Takahta with that of Seok to implement the sensor components on a printed circuit board as nothing but a standard and well-known step of implementing an electrical component with a plurality of components to allow for a fixed arrangement and organization of the components and protect the connection from breakage. As to claim 8. The combination of Cholasta and Takahta fails to disclose The steering apparatus according to claim 7, wherein a configuration other than the electrode of the sensor unit is provided on an electronic board, and the electrode is provided to correspond to each of a predetermined grip range of the rim portion on the left side and a predetermined grip range of the rim portion on the right side. Seok teaches a steering wheel and method for controlling the same comprising a sensor integrated circuit 131 mounted on a printed circuit board 130, [fig. 1, 0049], comprising wiring part to electrically connect the sensor components including electrodes 111-114 on the board, [0061]; wherein the electrodes 111-114 are arranged on both sides of the steering wheel 100, [fig. 2, 3]. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of the combination of Cholasta and Takahta with that of Seok to implement the sensor components on a printed circuit board as nothing but a standard and well-known step of implementing an electrical component with a plurality of components to allow for a fixed arrangement and organization of the components and protect the connection from breakage. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 5-8 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENYAM HAILE whose telephone number is (571)272-2080. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 AM - 5:30 PM Mon. - Thur.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached at (571)270-1210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Benyam Haile/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2688
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 20, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12768539
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR COMMUNICATING CONTROL SIGNALS IN A GRILL
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770485
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY ALLOCATING MONITORING SENSORS IN INTELLIGENT WALKING GUARD
1y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12748940
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TRACKING ANIMALS
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745756
PET CARE SYSTEM, PET CARE ROBOT AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PET CARE ROBOT
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12734004
SURGICAL ROBOTICS SYSTEM WITH TOOL AXIS REGISTRATION
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+24.6%)
2y 5m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 721 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month