Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/939,628

MANAGEMENT DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Priority
Nov 13, 2023 — JP 2023-193077
Examiner
WILLOUGHBY, TERRENCE RONIQUE
Art Unit
2836
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
423 granted / 527 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
537
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
75.2%
+35.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.9%
-33.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 527 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on November 7, 2024 and February 24, 2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Naito, Kazutaka et al. (WO 2024/070572 A1), hereinafter “Naito”. Regarding claim 1, Naito discloses in [Figs. 1-3], a management device for a vehicle on-board network system [see S] in which devices [see ECU’s 2] are connected to each other in a communicable manner [see communication network 3 and plurality of communication lines 31] , the management device comprising: processing circuitry [see on-board device 1] configured to start a target device of the devices [see page 2 and top of page 3] , the target device [see ECU 2] being a device that operates in accordance with a predetermined function to be executed [see last para. Of page 7], wherein the processing circuitry [see 1] is configured to: subsequent to modifications made to the vehicle on-board network system, obtain information including: a first startup power consumption required when starting the target device, using a first startup method for starting the target device through power control that controls whether to supply power to the target device [see pages 2-11]; and a second startup power consumption required when starting the target device, using a second startup method for starting the target device by communicating with the target device to request startup for the target device [see pages 2-11]; based on the obtained information, select a startup method for the target device from the first startup method and the second startup method; and start the target device using the selected startup method [see pages 2-11]. Regarding claim 2, Naito discloses the management device according to claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry [see 1] is configured to: calculate a difference between the first startup power consumption and the second startup power consumption; select the second startup method when the calculated difference is greater than or equal to a specified value; and select the first startup method when the calculated difference is less than the specified value [see last para. Of page 4 and page 5]. Regarding claim 3, Naito discloses the management device according to claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry [see 1] is configured to: calculate a ratio of the second startup power consumption to the first startup power consumption; select the first startup method when the calculated ratio is greater than or equal to a specified value; and select the second startup method when the calculated ratio is less than the specified value [see last para. Of page 4 and page 5]. Regarding claim 4, Naito discloses the management device according to claim 1, wherein the processing circuitry [see 1] is configured to: calculate a proportion of a difference between the first startup power consumption and the second startup power consumption relative to the first startup power consumption; select the second startup method when the calculated proportion is greater than or equal to a specified value, and select the first startup method when the calculated proportion is less than the specified value [see last para. of page 4 and page 5]. Regarding claim 5, Naito discloses the management device according to claim 1, wherein the vehicle on-board network system includes bus networks that are connected to the management device, each of the bus networks includes a power control line that starts the target device using the first startup method, and the processing circuitry is configured to obtain the information for each of the bus networks and select the startup method for each of the bus networks [see top para. on page 6]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERRENCE RONIQUE WILLOUGHBY whose telephone number is (571)272-2725. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at 571-272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERRENCE R WILLOUGHBY/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 4/18/26 /REXFORD N BARNIE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12627158
SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DC POWER CONVERSION AND TRANSMISSION FOR SOLAR FIELDS
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627140
Chain of Power Devices
2y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623619
POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
1y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12609536
POWER UNIT AND SOLID-STATE TRANSFORMER
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12580408
VOLTAGE BOOST CIRCUITRY FOR RADIO SYSTEMS
2y 6m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 8m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 527 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month