Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/939,675

ADAPTIVE ADJUSTABLE SPREAD SPECTRUM CONTROL CIRCUIT AND SPREAD SPECTRUM CONTROL METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Priority
Jun 03, 2024 — provisional 63/655,163 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, LONG T
Art Unit
2842
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Richtek Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
833 granted / 934 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
968
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§102
36.4%
-3.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 934 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Specie I (which corresponding to Figure 2) in the reply filed on 03/19/26 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Applicant indicates that claims 1, 3-5, 7-14, 16-18 and 20-26 are readable on the elected Specie I (Figure 2). Applicant also indicates that claims 2, 6, 15 and 19 are withdrawn from further consideration. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3-5, 7-10, 14, 16-18 and 20-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 2021/0391790). For claims 1 and 14, Figure 2 of Lee et al. teaches a spread spectrum control circuit (102), for generating a pulse-width modulation (PWM) signal (PWM2 and /PWM2 which is output of inverter 222) switched at a switching frequency (PWM1) to control a switching power converter (110), wherein the switching power converter (110) includes a power stage circuit (110), the power stage circuit (110) includes an inductor (206) and at least one power switch (202, 204) coupled to each other, and is configured to switch the at least one power switch (202, 204) according to the PWM signal (PWM2 and output of inverter 222) to convert an input voltage (VIN 224) to generate an output voltage (VOUT 228); the spread spectrum control circuit (102) comprising: a spread spectrum adjustment circuit (all elements in 108 except for 216 and 222), configured to generate a spread spectrum adjustment signal (COMP2) based on an operating parameter of the switching power converter (110), thereby controlling the switching frequency exhibiting a spread spectrum characteristic; and a PWM circuit (216, 222), configured to adaptively adjust a spread spectrum adjustment parameter (IL, output voltage FB and/or frequency) of the spread spectrum characteristic based on the spread spectrum adjustment signal (COMP2), so that the spread spectrum adjustment parameter is adaptively adjusted with changes in the operating parameter, thereby generating the PWM signal (PWM2, and output of inverter 222) exhibiting the spread spectrum characteristic (also see [0015]-[0016], [0023, [0025] and [0029]). Note that the apparatus of Figure 2 as discussed also teach all the method steps of the method claim. For claims 3 and 16, Figure 2 of Lee et al. teaches wherein the spread spectrum adjustment parameter (IL, output voltage FB and/or frequency) of the spread spectrum characteristic includes a spread spectrum variation range of the switching frequency (see [0016], [0028] and [0038]-[0039]). For claims 4-5 and 17-18, Figure 2 of Lee et al. teaches wherein the operating parameter includes an inductor current- related signal (IL), the switching frequency, and/or a relationship between the input voltage and the output voltage (Vout), wherein the inductor current-related signal (IL) is related to an inductor current flowing through the inductor (206). For claims 7 and 20, Figure 2 of Lee et al. teaches wherein the relationship between the input voltage (Vin) and the output voltage (Vout) includes at least one of the following: a ratio of the input voltage (Vin) to the output voltage (Vout); or a ratio of the output voltage (Vout) to the input voltage (Vin) (see [0023] which is based on the ratio resistor 208 and resistor 210 which generates voltage FB based on the output voltage Vout). For claims 8 and 21, Figure 2 of Lee et al. teaches wherein the spread spectrum variation range is positively corelated with the inductor current-related signal (IL), the switching frequency (PWM1), and/or the relationship between the input voltage (Vin) and the output voltage (Vout) (see[0016]-[0018], [0034]). For claims 9 and 22, Figure 2 of Lee et al. teaches wherein the power stage circuit (110) is configured as a buck power stage circuit (110), wherein the spread spectrum variation range is positively corelated with a ratio of the input voltage (Vin) to the output voltage (Vout, by way of feedback voltage FB, see [0023]). For claims 10 and 23, Figure 2 of Lee et al. teaches wherein the spread spectrum adjustment circuit (all elements in 108 except for 216 and 222) is further configured to generate the spread spectrum adjustment signal (COMP2) based on a comparison between the operating parameter and at least one threshold (comparator 212 compares FB and reference VREF), thereby adjusting the spread spectrum adjustment parameter. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-13 and 24-26 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Kikuchi (US 2009/0218999) teaches a power converter which has switching power control unit. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directly to Examiner Long Nguyen whose telephone number is (571) 272-1753. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 8:30am to 5:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch, can be reached at (571) 270-7101. The fax number for this group is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. /Long Nguyen/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12682970
SHIFT REGISTER AND METHOD FOR DRIVING THE SAME, GATE DRIVING CIRCUIT, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683605
CMOS SCHMITT TRIGGER RECEIVER FOR THIN OXIDE TECHNOLOGY
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676603
HIGH SPEED DYNAMIC COMPARTOR
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676605
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676540
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT WITH LOW POWER MODE MANAGEMENT
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.2%)
1y 10m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 934 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month