Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/940,154

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AN INSULATION RESISTANCE OF A VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Priority
Dec 13, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0180574
Examiner
LE, SON T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Kia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
552 granted / 670 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
83.3%
+43.3% vs TC avg
§102
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 670 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
3DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. KR10-2023-0180574, filed on 12/13/23. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a1) as being anticipated by Kwon (KR 101856068, hereinafter Kwon). Regarding to claim 1, Kwon discloses a device for monitoring an insulation resistance of a vehicle using a vehicle body as a ground point (figs. 1-6, fig. 1 shows a battery pack 11 connected to MCU 31 and battery pack 12 connected to MCU 32), the device comprising: a monitoring resistance having a predetermined resistance value (figs. 2-5[R2]); a first switch (figs. 3[SW4]) configured to connect the monitoring resistance (figs. 2-5[R2]) to the ground point (one end of SW4 connected to ground) or to a first node (node formed by SW4 and R2); a second switch (figs. 3-4[SW3]) configured to connect the monitoring resistance (figs. 2-5[R2]) to the ground point (one end of SW3 connected to ground) or to a second node (node formed by SW3 and R2); a third switch (figs. 3[SW1] (closed)) configured to connect the first node to a positive electrode of an auxiliary battery pack or to a positive electrode of a main battery pack (node formed by SW4 (closed) and R2 connected to positive terminal of Pack+); and a fourth switch (figs. 3[SW2] (closed)) configured to connect the second node to a negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack or to a negative electrode of the main battery pack (node formed by SW3 (closed) and R2 connected to negative terminal of Pack-). Regarding to claim 2, Kwon discloses the device of claim 1, wherein: in an operation mode in which a first insulation resistance (fig. 3 show [RLEAK(+)] measurement) between the positive electrode of the main battery pack (fig. 1 battery 11 and MCU31) and the ground point is measured (controller 220 calculates the anode and cathode insulation resistances RLEAK (+) and RLEAK (-) using the calculated battery pack voltage), the first switch is configured to connect the monitoring resistance to the ground point (figs. 3 shows [SW4] (closed) to connect R2 to ground), the second switch is configured to connect the monitoring resistance to the second node (figs. 3 shows [SW3] always connected to R2 at the second node), and the fourth switch is configured to connect the second node to the negative electrode of the main battery pack (fig. 3 shows [SW2] (closed) to connect to negative electrode of Pack-). Regarding to claim 4, Kwon discloses the device of claim 1, wherein: in an operation mode in which a second insulation resistance (fig. 4 show [RLEAK(-)] measurement) between the negative electrode of the main battery pack (fig. 1 battery 11 and MCU31) and the ground point is measured (controller 220 calculates the anode and cathode insulation resistances RLEAK (+) and RLEAK (-) using the calculated battery pack voltage), the first switch is configured to connect the monitoring resistance to the first node (figs. 4 shows [SW4] always connected to R2 at the first node), the second switch is configured to connect the monitoring resistance to the ground point, and the third switch is configured to connect the first node to the positive electrode of the main battery pack (fig. 4 shows [SW1] (closed) to connect to negative electrode of Pack-). Regarding to claim 6, Kwon discloses the device of claim 1, wherein: in an operation mode in which a third insulation (fig. 3 show [RLEAK(-)] measurement) resistance between the positive electrode of the auxiliary battery pack (fig. 1 battery 12 and MCU32) and the ground point is measured (controller 220 calculates the anode and cathode insulation resistances RLEAK (+) and RLEAK (-) using the calculated battery pack voltage), the first switch connects the monitoring resistance to the ground point (figs. 3 shows [SW4] (closed) to connect R2 to ground), the second switch connects the monitoring resistance to the second node (figs. 3 shows [SW3] always connected to R2 at the second node), and the fourth switch connects the second node to the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack (fig. 3 shows [SW2] (closed) to connect to negative electrode of Pack-). Regarding to claim 8, Kwon discloses the device of claim 1, wherein: in an operation mode in which a fourth insulation resistance (fig. 4 show [RLEAK(-)] measurement) between the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack (fig. 1 battery 12 and MCU32) and the ground point is measured (controller 220 calculates the anode and cathode insulation resistances RLEAK (+) and RLEAK (-) using the calculated battery pack voltage), the first switch is configured to connect the monitoring resistance to the first node (figs. 4 shows [SW4] always connected to R2 at the first node), the second switch is configured to connect the monitoring resistance to the ground point, and the third switch is configured to connect the first node to the positive electrode of the auxiliary battery pack (fig. 4 shows [SW1] (closed) to connect to negative electrode of Pack-). Regarding to claim 10, Kwon discloses the device of claim 1, wherein: the device is configured to sequentially and repeatedly perform, in a predetermined order: a first operation mode in which a first insulation resistance (fig. 3 show [RLEAK(+)] measurement) between the positive electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point is measured (fig. 1 battery 11 and MCU31 measured in fig. 3 as SW1 connected to pack+ and SW4 closed position); a second operation mode in which a second insulation resistance (fig. 3 show [RLEAK(-)] measurement) between the negative electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point is measured (fig. 1 battery 11 and MCU31 measured in fig. 3 as SW2 connected to pack- and SW4 closed position); a third operation mode in which a third insulation resistance (fig. 3 show [RLEAK(+)] measurement) between the positive electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point is measured (fig. 1 battery 12 and MCU32 measured in fig. 3 as SW1 closed position connected to pack+ and SW4 closed position); and a fourth operation mode in which a fourth insulation resistance between the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point is measured (fig. 1 battery 12 and MCU32 measured in fig. 3 as SW2 closed position connected to pack- and SW4 closed position). Regarding to claim 13, Kwon discloses a method for monitoring an insulation resistance of a vehicle using a vehicle body as a ground point (fig. 1-6 show [RLEAK] measurement; fig. 1 shows a battery pack 11 connected to MCU 31 and battery pack 12 connected to MCU 32)), the method comprising: performing a first operation mode (fig. 3 shows [RLEAK] measurement applied to battery 11 and MCU 31) in which a first insulation resistance (RLEAK(+)) between a positive electrode (Pack+) of a main battery pack (battery pack 11) and the ground point is measured; performing a second operation mode (fig. 3 shows [RLEAK] measurement applied to battery 11 and MCU 31) in which a second insulation resistance (RLEAK(-)) between a negative electrode (Pack-) of the main battery pack (battery pack 11) and the ground point is measured; performing a third operation mode (fig. 3 shows [RLEAK] measurement applied to battery 12 and MCU 32) in which a third insulation resistance (RLEAK(+)) between a positive electrode (Pack+) of an auxiliary battery pack (battery pack 12) and the ground point is measured; and performing a fourth operation mode (fig. 3 shows [RLEAK] measurement applied to battery 12 and MCU 32) in which a fourth insulation resistance (RLEAK(-)) between a negative electrode (Pack-) of the auxiliary battery pack (battery pack 12) and the ground point is measured. Regarding to claim 18, Kwon discloses the method of claim 13, further comprising: determining whether the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the main battery pack are connected to the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack (fig. 3), respectively, by a battery relay (fig. 3 shows the battery 12 connected to the positive by SW1 (close position) and negative by SW2 (close position)); and when it is determined that the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the main battery pack are connected to the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack (fig. 3 shows the battery 11 connected to the positive by SW1 (close position) and negative by SW2 (close position)), respectively, by the battery relay, sequentially and repeatedly performing, in a predetermined order, the first operation mode, the second operation mode, the third operation mode, and the fourth operation mode (see figs. 3-6). Regarding to claim 19, Kwon discloses the method of claim 18, further comprising: when it is determined that the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the main battery pack are not connected to the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack (fig. 4 shows the battery 12 not connected to the positive by SW1 (open position) and fig. 5 shows the battery 12 not connected to negative by SW2 (open position)), respectively, by the battery relay, alternately and repeatedly performing only the first operation mode and the second operation mode (see figs. 4-6). Regarding to claim 20, Kwon discloses the method of claim 18, further comprising: when it is determined that the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the main battery pack are not connected to the positive electrode (fig. 4 shows the battery 11 not connected to the positive by SW1 (open position) and fig. 5 shows the battery 12 not connected to negative by SW2 (open position)) and the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack, respectively, by the battery relay, alternately and repeatedly performing only the third operation mode and the fourth operation mode (see figs. 4-6). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 5, 7, 9, 11-12 and 14-17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding to claims 3 and 14, the prior arts of record, alone or in combination, do not fairly teach or suggest “wherein the first insulation resistance is calculated according to Equation 1: PNG media_image1.png 91 563 media_image1.png Greyscale where RMISOP represents the first insulation resistance, RST represents the monitoring resistance, VM1 represents a voltage between the negative electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point, VM2 represents a voltage between the positive electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point, and V′ represents a voltage across the monitoring resistance” including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding to claims 5 and 15, the prior arts of record, alone or in combination, do not fairly teach or suggest “wherein the second insulation resistance is calculated according to Equation 2: PNG media_image2.png 118 590 media_image2.png Greyscale where RMISON represents the second insulation resistance, RST represents the monitoring resistance, VM1 represents a voltage between the negative electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point, VM2 represents a voltage between the positive electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point, and V′ represents a voltage across the monitoring resistance” including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding to claims 7 and 16, the prior arts of record, alone or in combination, do not fairly teach or suggest “wherein the third insulation resistance is calculated according to Equation 3: PNG media_image3.png 104 477 media_image3.png Greyscale where RSISOP represents the third insulation resistance, RST represents the monitoring resistance, VS1 represents a voltage between the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point, VS2 represents a voltage between the positive electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point, and V′ represents a voltage across the monitoring resistance” including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding to claims 9 and 17, the prior arts of record, alone or in combination, do not fairly teach or suggest “device of claim 8, wherein the fourth insulation resistance is calculated according to Equation 4: PNG media_image4.png 110 497 media_image4.png Greyscale where RSISON represents the fourth insulation resistance, RST represents the monitoring resistance, VS1 represents a voltage between the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point, VS2 represents a voltage between the positive electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point, and V′ represents a voltage across the monitoring resistance” including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding to claim 11, the prior arts of record, alone or in combination, do not fairly teach or suggest “wherein: when the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the main battery pack are connected to the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack, respectively, by a battery relay, the device is configured to alternately and repeatedly perform only: a first operation mode in which a first insulation resistance between the positive electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point is measured; and a second operation mode in which a second insulation resistance between the negative electrode of the main battery pack and the ground point is measured” including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding to claim 12, the prior arts of record, alone or in combination, do not fairly teach or suggest “wherein: when the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the main battery pack are connected to the positive electrode and the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack, respectively, by a battery relay, the device is configured to alternately and repeatedly performs only: a third operation mode in which a third insulation resistance between the positive electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point is measured; and a fourth operation mode in which a fourth insulation resistance between the negative electrode of the auxiliary battery pack and the ground point is measured” including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SON T LE whose telephone number is (571)270-5818. The examiner can normally be reached M to F, 7AM - 4PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eman Alkafawi can be reached at 5712724448. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SON T LE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678330
TECHNIQUES FOR PERFORMING A SAFETY TEST OF A LASER DIODE OPHTHALMIC SURGICAL APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680890
Method and Device for Compensating Electromagnetic Interferences
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674688
POSITION DETECTION DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669457
MESOFLUIDIC IMPEDIMETRIC SENSOR FOR STAINLESS STEEL SCALE ANALYSIS
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669534
FAILURE DETECTION DEVICE
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 8m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 670 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month