Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/941,088

CONTEXT AWARE WORD CLOUD FOR CONTEXT ORIENTED DYNAMIC ACTIONS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
Dec 16, 2020 — continuation of 12/165,411
Examiner
CHANG, DANIEL CHEOLJIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Istreamplanet Co. LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
132 granted / 149 resolved
+28.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
165
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§103
53.2%
+13.2% vs TC avg
§102
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 149 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Notice to Applicants This communication is in response to the Application filed on 11/8/2024. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “determining ... at least one change in the set of frames based on comparing the set of actions and the dialogue to a previous set of actions and a previous dialogue of a previous set of frames of the media stream.” However, the recited comparison is unclear. It is unclear whether the claim requires separately comparing the set of actions to the previous set of actions and the dialogue to the previous dialogue, collectively comparing the set of actions and dialogue with the previous set of actions and previous dialogue, or determining whether either the actions or the dialogue has changed. This distinction matters since the block 409 in FIG. 4 recites “determine whether material change in action information or dialogue occurred?” Additionally, it is unclear how the results of the recited comparison establish “at least one change in the set of frames.” The claim does not clearly specify whether the change refers to a change in the correlated action and dialogue information or physical change within the frames. The plain language of the claim requires a “change in the set of frames,” which implies an analysis of the raw video frame data. The specification and drawings describe evaluating a change in the “correlated action and dialogue information”, not the raw video frames themselves. Please refer “[0066] The identified action and similar context information is correlated with the dialogue information (Block 407). The correlated information is checked to determine whether there is a change relative to previously processed frames (Block 409).” in the specification and the blocks 407 & 409 in FIG. 4. With respect to claim 10, arguments analogous to those presented for claim 1, are applicable. With respect to claim 19, arguments analogous to those presented for claim 1, are applicable. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL C. CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1277. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday and Alternate Fridays 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chan S. Park can be reached at (571) 272-7409. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL C CHANG/Examiner, Art Unit 2669 /CHAN S PARK/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2669
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737840
REALTIME VIDEO SUPER RESOLUTION USING MOTION VECTORS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12712077
INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, MEDICAL IMAGE DIAGNOSTIC APPARATUS, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12711639
INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, METHOD AND PROGRAM
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12675896
IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670611
AIRCRAFT STEERING ANGLE DETERMINATION
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.7%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 149 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month