Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/941,245

METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUSES FOR CONCURRENT RECEPTION FOR NON-PRIMARY CHANNEL ACCESS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Examiner
CHEN, PETER
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
419 granted / 477 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
510
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 477 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office action is a response to Preliminary Amendment made to an Application No. 18/941,245 filed on 11/08/2024 in which claims 4, 6, 7, 10, 14-16, and 19 are amended and no claims are canceled nor added. Accordingly, Claims 1-20 are currently pending for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Drawings The Examiner contends that the drawings submitted on 11/08/2024 are acceptable for examination proceedings. Claim Objections Claim 2-10 and 12-19 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 2-10 recite “An apparatus according to claim 1” in the preamble. For formality, it is suggested to change to -- The apparatus -- since claims 2-10 are dependent upon claim 1. Claims 12-19 recite “An apparatus according to claim 11” in the preamble. For formality, it is suggested to change to -- The apparatus -- since claims 12-19 are dependent upon claim 11. Appropriate corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by NAIK et al. (US 2025/0113339 A1) hereinafter “Naik”. Regarding claim 1, Naik discloses an apparatus (see FIG. 15; see ¶ [0230-32], AP), comprising: at least one processor (see FIG. 15; see ¶ [0230-32], AP includes processor); and at least one memory storing instructions that (see FIG. 15; see ¶ [0230-32], AP includes memory), when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: transmit a first message via a first primary channel associated with a basic service set, the first message comprising first information indicating a first capability of the apparatus to communicate via non-primary channel access (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0041] [0046] [0083-84] [0131], a single AP and an associated set of STAs may be referred to as a basic service set (BSS) and the AP may transmit DSO (dynamic subchannel operation) capability information of the AP to the STA, in which DSO is to support non-primary channel access); and receive a second message from a second apparatus via the first primary channel in response to the first message, the second message comprising second information indicating a second capability of the second apparatus to communicate via the non-primary channel access (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0041] [0083-84] [0131], the STA may report DSO capability information of the STA to the AP, in which DSO is to support non-primary channel access). Regarding claims 2 and 12, Naik discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to: transmit third information indicating enablement of the first capability at the apparatus (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0083-84] [0132], exchange DSO mode enablement signaling). Regarding claims 3 and 13, Naik discloses wherein, to transmit the third information, the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to: transmit a message comprising the third information over a plurality of time-domain resources, wherein a first one or more time-domain resources of the plurality of time-domain resources are associated with the transmission of the third information, and wherein a second one or more time-domain resources of the plurality of time-domain resources are associated with a switch from the first primary channel to at least one primary channel associated with the non-primary channel access (see ¶ [0070] [0096], Different RUs may be allocated or assigned by an AP to different STAs at particular times, the control frame may indicate one or more time occasions and switching operating bands according to the control frame indicating the one or more time occasions for switching). Regarding claims 4 and 14, Naik discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to: based at least in part on the second capability, transmit a third message indicating activation of the non-primary channel access for communication between the apparatus and the second apparatus (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0083-84] [0132], exchange DSO mode enablement signaling). Regarding claim 5, Naik discloses wherein the third message is indicative of at least one of the following: an indication of a second primary channel for the non-primary channel access (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0088] [0134], a control frame assigning, to the STA for the DSO, a frequency resource included in at least one secondary subchannel of the set of secondary subchannels). Regarding claims 6 and 15, Naik discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to: based at least in part on the first capability, perform at least one of carrier sensing or packet detection on the first primary channel and at least one primary channel associated with the non-primary channel access (see ¶ [0058] [0174], perform carrier sensing). Regarding claims 7 and 16, Naik discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to: based at least in part on the second capability, transmit a fourth message to the second apparatus via a second primary channel associated with the non-primary channel access (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0135], the STA and the AP may exchange PPDUs via the assigned frequency resource of the at least one secondary subchannel). Regarding claims 8 and 17, Naik discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to: select a transmission bandwidth for the transmission of the fourth message via the second primary channel based at least in part on one or more criteria (see ¶ [0091] [0099] [0140], The frame contents may indicate a bandwidth for one or more supported subchannels and the secondary subchannels signaling may indicate location and bandwidth information for the subchannels to which the STA may switch for DSO). Regarding claims 9 and 18, Naik discloses wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the apparatus to: transmit third information indicating disablement of the first capability at the apparatus; and transmit a message over the first primary channel based at least in part on the disablement (see FIG. 9; see ¶ [0098] [0136], exchange DSO mode disablement signaling). Regarding claims 10 and 19, Naik discloses wherein the first capability comprises a capability of the apparatus to perform packet detection concurrently on the first primary channel and at least one channel associated with the non-primary channel access, and wherein the second capability comprises a capability of the second apparatus to perform packet detection concurrently on the first primary channel and the at least one channel associated with the non-primary channel access (see ¶ [0088] [0090], the capability signaling may additionally, or alternatively, indicate a set of subchannels supported for DSO for concurrent transmissions and the STA may indicate, via the capability signaling,, a threshold quantity of subchannels for which the STA supports concurrent communications). Regarding claims 11 and 20, Naik discloses Claim 11 of an apparatus (see FIG. 14; see ¶ [0181-83], STA), and Claim 20 of a method, comprising: at least one processor (see FIG. 14; see ¶ [0181-83], STA includes processor); and at least one memory storing instructions that (see FIG. 14; see ¶ [0181-83], STA includes memory), when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: receive, from a second apparatus, a first message via a first primary channel associated with a basic service set, the first message comprising first information indicating a first capability of the apparatus to communicate via non-primary channel access (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0041] [0046] [0083-84] [0131], a single AP and an associated set of STAs may be referred to as a basic service set (BSS) and the AP may transmit DSO (dynamic subchannel operation) capability information of the AP to the STA, in which DSO is to support non-primary channel access); and transmit a second message to the second apparatus via the first primary channel in response to the first message, the second message comprising second information indicating a second capability of the second apparatus to communicate via the non-primary channel access (see FIG. 5 and 9; see ¶ [0041] [0083-84] [0131], the STA may report DSO capability information of the STA to the AP, in which DSO is to support non-primary channel access). Conclusion The prior art made of record (see attached PTO-892) and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. HASABELNABY et al. (US 2026/0101369 A1) teaches methods, systems and apparatus for coordinated non-primary channel access (Co-NPCA) are provided. In one aspect, a method involves inter-BSS coordination, where a first AP communicates with a second AP to synchronize NPCA parameters, such as the NPCA primary channel and channel switching delays. In another aspect, a method for intra-BSS coordination allows an AP to inform an associated STA of the NPCA primary channel and receive feedback on channel switching delays (see Abstract). HELWA et al. (US 2026/0129677 A1) teaches methods, components, devices and systems for non-primary channel access (NPCA) conditions for joint operation with coordinated access point (AP) procedures. Some aspects more specifically relate to preventing an NPCA-enabled station from switching to the secondary primary channel during a coordinated transmission messaging sequence. In some examples, a first AP may transmit, to the NPCA-enabled station, a first frame that indicates one or more parameters associated with a determination of whether to transition from the first primary channel to a secondary primary channel (see Abstract). A shortened statutory period for reply to this action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of the action. An extension of time may be obtained under 37 CFR 1.136(a). However, in no event, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PETER CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7241. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00am to 5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yemane Mesfin can be reached at (571) 272-3927. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PETER CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2462
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12763912
FEEDBACK FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS
4y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12733004
UPLINK CONTROL SIGNALING IN CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726926
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12713457
Handling of Directional UL LBT Failures
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12712676
METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF HARQ RETRANSMISSION FOR NR MBS SERVICES
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.8%)
2y 7m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 477 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month