Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/941,614

PROGRAMMABLE HAPTIC FEEDBACK INDUSTRIAL PADDLE SWITCH FOR OPERATING A MOTOR CONTROLLED DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
Nov 10, 2023 — provisional 63/597,773 +1 more
Examiner
AGARED, GABRIEL T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hubbell Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
484 granted / 583 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
597
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 583 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to an application filed on 11/08/2024. Claims 1-15 are pending for examination. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “a a knob” in line 3 should be re-written as “a knob”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 6 recites the limitation "a motor" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a) (1) as being anticipated by Rosenberg (US 2002/0142701 A1). As to Claim 1, Rosenberg in its teachings as shown in Fig.1-7 disclose a programmable sensory feedback switch to control a motorized device (14) comprising: a user moveable control interface (20, 22) chosen from a a knob, a lever, and a paddle switch, and configured to be manually touched by the user and moved along at least one axis thereof by a designated amount to control the motorized device (…time-based haptic effects can be output in the degree of freedom of a control, similar to the tactile effects described above. For example, a vibration or jolt can be directly output on the lever 20 or 22 while the user is holding it when controlling the toy 14 in a desired manner. The magnitude and/or frequency of the jolt or vibration can be based on the position of the control in its degree of freedom, and/or can simulate engine rumble, turning radius, etc… see [0045]); at least one electronic sensor (318) to detect movement of the user moveable control interface when manipulated by the user and to generate voltage outputs based on detected position of the user moveable control interface (see [0069]); a vibration motor (170) disposed proximally to the user moveable control interface (see [0037]); and a switch operational software program executed by a programmable processor (310) to generate vibration motor control signals that produce vibrations in one or more designated patterns based on detected position of the user moveable control interface and corresponding control commands for the motorized device to provide haptic vibration feedback to the user (see [0066] - [0074]). As to Claim 2, Rosenberg disclose the programmable sensory feedback switch of claim 1, further comprising a molded handle (20) that covers the user moveable control interface and is shaped to provide the user with an ergonomic grip (see Fig.6 and [0060]). As to Claim 3, Rosenberg disclose the programmable sensory feedback switch of claim 1, wherein the vibration motor is disposed within the handle and proximal to at least a portion of the ergonomic grip (see Fig.6 and [0060]). As to Claim 4, Rosenberg disclose the programmable sensory feedback switch of claim 1, wherein the at least one electronic sensor is a Hall effect sensor (see [0069]). As to Claim 5, Rosenberg disclose the programmable sensory feedback switch of claim 1, wherein the processor is disposed at a location chosen from inside a housing for the at least one electronic sensor provided in the programmable sensory feedback switch, inside a molded handle that covers the user moveable control interface, and separate from programmable sensory feedback switch (see Fig.6 and Fig.7 and [0065]- [0067]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-15 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure (US 9,625,905 B2: A haptic feedback remote control device provides control signals to a toy device, such as a car, boat, plane, etc., to control the toy's operation. The remote control device includes a housing and at least one control for manual manipulation by the user, where control signals representing the manipulation are sent to the toy, preferably transmitted wirelessly. An actuator outputs forces on the housing and/or on a control in response to actuator signals. A controller provides the actuator signals based on the manual manipulation of the control by the user, or based on status signals from the toy indicating the toy's actions or interactions, or based on both. In one embodiment, the actuator moves an inertial mass to provide inertial sensations on the housing. The information received from the toy device can include information from a contact sensor or inertial sensor on the toy device- see [Abstract]) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GABRIEL T AGARED whose telephone number is (571)270-1981. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 (Mon- Thur). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at (571) 272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GABRIEL AGARED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683534
MOTOR CONTROL DEVICE AND IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683527
SENSORLESS TRAPEZOIDAL MOTOR CONTROL
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675092
Frequency Domain Work Analysis of Machinery including Turbomachinery
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673764
MULTIPIVOT USER INTERFACE DEVICES AND RELATED VEHICLE SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671354
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING AN ANGULAR POSITION OF AN ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+19.2%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 583 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month