Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/941,621

Transmission Method for Optical Communication and Corresponding Device

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
May 10, 2022 — CN 202210504319.2 +1 more
Examiner
BELLO, AGUSTIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
693 granted / 919 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
934
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
41.8%
+1.8% vs TC avg
§102
43.8%
+3.8% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 919 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 4-8, 16-18, 21-25, and 33 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by the OIF publication “OIF-400ZR-01.0 Implementation Agreement 400ZR” cited by Applicant. Regarding claim 1, 17, 18, the OIF Publication teaches A transmission/receiving device for optical communication (e.g. “Transceiver” as in Figure 2, Figure 4 and throughout), comprising a memory and one or more processors coupled to the memory (e.g. any of the numerous processors and memories coupled together as illustrated in Figure 6) and configured to: generate a frame comprising symbols (e.g. as illustrated in Figure 34), wherein the symbols comprise NFAW frame alignment word symbols (e.g. “FAW” as in paragraph 12.1), NPS pilot symbols (e.g. “Pilot” as in paragraph 12), and NRES reserved symbols (e.g. “Reserved” as in paragraph 12.1) in a first polarization direction of two polarization directions (e.g. “X and Y” “orthogonal polarizations” as in paragraph 12.4), wherein the two polarization directions are orthogonal to each other (e.g. “X and Y” “orthogonal polarizations” as in paragraph 12.4), wherein in the first polarization direction, one symbol in every M symbols of the symbols in the frame is a pilot symbol (e.g. “Pilot symbols are inserted every 32 symbols” as in paragraph 12), wherein M is an integer greater than 1 (e.g. “32” as in paragraph 12), wherein NFAW+NRES=M or NFAW+NRES+1=M (e.g. in the second 32 symbol frame NFAW=1, NRES=30, M=32 therefore NFAW+NRES+1=M); wherein each of the frame alignment word symbols and the pilot symbols is one of −A−Aj, −A+Aj, A−Aj, or A+Aj, wherein A is a real number (e.g. as illustrated in Table 9 and Table 12); and transmit/decode the frame (e.g. via “Transceiver” as in Figure 2, Figure 4 and throughout). Regarding claim 4, 21, the OIF Publication teaches The transmission device of claim 1, there is no symbol serving as both a frame alignment word symbol of the frame alignment word symbols and a pilot symbol of the pilot symbols in the frame in the polarization direction, wherein NFAW+NRES+1=M (e.g. in the second 32 symbol frame NFAW=1, NRES=30, M=32 therefore NFAW+NRES+1=M), and wherein NFAW+NPS is an even number (e.g. in the second 32 symbol frame NFAW=1, NPS=1, therefore NFAW+NPS=2). Regarding claim 5, 22, the OIF Publication teaches The transmission device of claim 4, further comprising generating the pilot symbols using a target polynomial and a seed (e.g. “polynomial and seed” as in Table 11), wherein a combination of (NFAW+NPS) symbols achieves a direct current balance (e.g. “DC balanced” as in paragraph 12.3). Regarding claim 6, 23, the OIF Publication teaches The transmission device of claim 1, wherein a value of NFAW is 22 or 11 (e.g. “22 symbol Frame Alignment Word” as in paragraph 12.1). Regarding claim 7, 24, the OIF Publication teaches The transmission device of claim 1, wherein the symbols are in a 16-quadrature amplitude modulation 16QAM modulation format (e.g. “16QAM” as in paragraph 12.1), and wherein a value of A is ±1, ±3, or ±√5 (e.g. as shown in Table 9, Table 10, and Table 12). Regarding claim 8, 25, the OIF Publication teaches The transmission device of claim 1, wherein a value of M is 64 (e.g. the first two 32 symbols frames taken together). Regarding claim 16, 33, the OIF Publication teaches The transmission device of claim 1, wherein the frame alignment word symbols are training symbols (e.g. as illustrated in the first 32 symbol frame of Figure 34). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-3, 9-15, 19-20, 26-32 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art fails to teach or fairly suggest one symbol serving as both a frame alignment word symbol and a pilot symbol in the frame such that NFAW+NRES=M, and NFAW+NPS is an odd number. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AGUSTIN BELLO whose telephone number is (571)272-3026. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday, 9 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Payne can be reached at (571)272-3024. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AGUSTIN BELLO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744362
FIBER STRUCTURE, OPTICAL COMBINER, LASER LIGHT SOURCE, AND LASER DEVICE
4y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742930
OPTICAL PHASED ARRAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744596
A LIFI MODULE, A MOBILE DEVICE COMPRISING THE LIFI MODULE AND A METHOD OF INITIATING HANDOVER OF THE USER DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12733814
INFRARED OTOSCOPE FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF EFFUSION
4y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736764
OPTICAL MODULE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 9m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 919 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month