Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026
Application No. 18/941,730

LIGHT-EMITTING STRUCTURE AND PRESS KEY

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
Apr 30, 2024 — CN 202410540624.6
Examiner
JIMENEZ, ANTHONY R
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Brightek Optoelectronic Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
983 granted / 1114 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1164
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1114 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-20 are pending in the current application. Drawings The drawings are objected to because the view numbers must be larger than the numbers used for reference characters. See 37 C.F.R. 1.84(u)(2). Additionally, FIG. 6 is objected to because the text adjacent 146 is illegible. See 37 C.F.R. 1.84(l). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (B) CONCLUSION. - The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 5-10 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Specifically, regarding Claim 5, the 3rd to the last line, there is no antecedent basis for the language “the maximum.” Regarding Claim 6, line 2, it is not clear what is meant by the language “communicated with.” Regarding Claim 9, line 4, there is no antecedent basis for the language “the outside.” Regarding Claim 10, line 4, there is no antecedent basis for the language “the outside.” Regarding Claim 15, the 3rd to the last line, there is no antecedent basis for the language “the maximum.” Regarding Claim 16, line 2, it is not clear what is meant by the language “communicated with.” Regarding Claim 19, line 4, there is no antecedent basis for the language “the outside.” Regarding Claim 20, line 4, there is no antecedent basis for the language “the outside.” Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 11-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yang et al. (Taiwanese Pat. No. TW 201546849 A, hereinafter “Yang”) in view of He et al. (Chinese Pat. No. CN 202126955 U, hereinafter “He”). Specifically, Yang discloses a light-emitting structure (Abstract), comprising: a circuit substrate (10; FIG. 1), a light-emitting element (16; FIG. 1), arranged on the circuit substrate (10; FIG. 1), a light-transmitting body (18; FIG. 1), arranged on the circuit substrate (10; FIG. 1) and packaging an outside of the light-emitting element (16), the light-transmitting body (18) having a light-exiting surface (an outer surface of 18 between adjacent portions of 20; FIG. 1) facing away from the circuit substrate (10), and a light-shielding body (20; FIG. 1), arranged on the circuit substrate (10) and packaging an outside of the light-transmitting body (18), the light-shielding body (20) having a light-exiting part (an area between adjacent ones of 20; FIG. 1) arranged on the light-exiting surface (182; FIG. 1), as recited in Claim 1, (ii) a keycap (12; FIG. 2) and the light-emitting structure according to claim 1, wherein the keycap (12) is provided with a light-emitting hole (122; FIG. 1), the light-emitting hole (122) is a strip-shaped hole (FIG. 1), the light-emitting structure is arranged inside the keycap (12; FIG. 1), the light-exiting part is arranged opposite to the light-emitting hole (122; FIG. 1), as recited in Claim 11. Yang does not disclose that the (i) light-exiting part having two first light-exiting holes for emitting light, wherein the two first light-exiting holes are arranged at intervals, as recited in Claim 1, (ii) orthographic projections, as recited in Claims 2 and 3, (iii) two first light-exiting holes, as recited in Claims 4 and 11, (iv) orthographic projections, as recited in Claims 12 and 13, and (v) shape, as recited in Claim 14. However, He discloses that (i) a light-exiting part (131; FIG. 4) having two first light-exiting holes for emitting light (FIG. 4), wherein the two first light-exiting holes are arranged at intervals (FIG. 4), as recited in Claim 1, (ii) orthographic projections of centers of light inlets of the two first light-exiting holes on the circuit substrate (two of the holes of 131; FIG. 4) are respectively arranged on opposite sides of an orthographic projection of a center of the light-emitting element (11) on the circuit substrate (the center of the light-emitting element 11 is centered between each hole of 131, as shown in FIG. 3; see, also, FIG. 4), as recited in Claim 2, (iii) orthographic projections of the centers of the light inlets of the two first light-exiting holes on the circuit substrate (10) are collinear with the orthographic projection of the center of the light-emitting element (16) on the circuit substrate (FIG. 4), as recited in Claim 3, (iv) the two first light-exiting holes are respectively circular holes (FIG. 3), as recited in Claim 4, (v) the two first light-exiting holes are arranged along a length direction of the strip-shaped hole (FIGS. 3 and 4), as recited in Claim 11, (vi) wherein orthographic projections of centers of light inlets of the two first light-exiting holes on the circuit substrate are respectively arranged on opposite sides of an orthographic projection of a center of the light-emitting element on the circuit substrate (with the light-emitting element centered between each hole of 131; FIGS. 3 and 4), as recited in Claim 12, (vii) that the orthographic projections of the centers of the light inlets of the two first light-exiting holes on the circuit substrate (FIG. 4) are collinear with the orthographic projection of the center of the light-emitting element on the circuit substrate (with the light-emitting element centered between each hole of 131; FIGS. 3 and 4), as recited in Claim 13, (viii) the two first light-exiting holes are respectively circular holes (FIG. 3), as recited in Claim 14. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of He with those of Yang to provide a same luminance no matter a position opposite to a lateral lighting type light emitting diode (Abstract). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant's disclosure. Liu (U.S. Pat. No. 8,383,971 B2) discloses an illuminated keyboard utilizing a light-emitting element but does not disclose the claimed light-shielding body, as recited in Claim 1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY R. JIMENEZ whose telephone number is 313-446-6518. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Thursday, 1030am - 9pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, Applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Renee Luebke, can be reached at (571) 272-2009. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY R JIMENEZ/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770807
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND BUTTON THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771056
Electrical Connector and Electrical Connector Stack
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12770809
DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROW SWITCH
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12755918
ELECTRICAL PROTECTION DEVICES COMPRISING AN INTEGRATED SWITCHING MODULE
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12749631
ELECTRICAL CONTACT SYSTEM WITH LIQUID METAL LAYER AND DIFFUSION BARRIER
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 2m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1114 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month