Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/941,850

ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
Nov 13, 2023 — JP 2023-193204
Examiner
GONZALEZ QUINONES, JOSE A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mcf Electric Drive Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
895 granted / 1177 resolved
+16.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1196
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1177 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/08/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Okochi (US PG Pub 2017/0012503). As to independent claim 1, Okochi teaches a rotary electric machine comprising: a rotor (10) including a permanent magnet (16); a shaft (50) configured to rotatably support the rotor (10); a shaft passage (52) provided inside the shaft (50); and a rotor passage (24) into which a liquid coolant flows from the shaft passage (52) through a flow inlet that is an opening on an inner circumferential surface of the rotor (10), wherein the rotor passage (28) includes an upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) extending radially outwardly from the flow inlet (28), and a downstream passage (22) connecting to the upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) and extending in an axial direction, the upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) includes a first upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) and a second upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) arranged in a circumferential direction of the rotor (10), and a radial position of an outer circumferential end of the first upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) is defined radially outwardly or radially inwardly of a radial position of an outer circumferential end of the second upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) as shown in figure 1. As to claim 2/1, Okochi teaches wherein the first upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) extends along a q-axis direction, and the second upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) extends along a d-axis direction as shown in figure 1. As to claim 3/1, Okochi teaches wherein the first upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) and the second upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) are provided alternately in the circumferential direction of the rotor (10) as shown in figure 1. As to claim 4/1, Okochi teaches wherein an outer circumferential portion of the upstream passage (see annotated figure 1) has an elliptical shape in axial cross-section as shown in figure 1. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okochi (US PG Pub2017/0012503) as applied in claim 1 above, and further in view of Ying (CN114844253). As to claim 6/1, Okochi teaches further comprising: a stator (62) provided radially outside the rotor (10), a coil end (66) provided in an axial end portion of the stator (62) as shown in figure 2, However Okochi teaches the claimed limitation as discussed above except an end plate (provided in an axial end portion of the rotor, and a flow outlet passage provided in the end plate and extending in a radial direction, wherein the flow outlet passage includes an inner circumferential portion connecting to the downstream passage, and an outer circumferential end including a flow outlet oriented toward the coil end. Ying teaches an end plate (44) provided in an axial end portion of the rotor (4), and a flow outlet passage (442) provided in the end plate (44) and extending in a radial direction, wherein the flow outlet passage (442) includes an inner circumferential portion connecting to the downstream passage (431a), and an outer circumferential end including a flow outlet (442) oriented toward the coil end (321) as shown in figure 2, for the advantageous benefit of providing a motor with parallel oil cooling structure, using the motor stator and rotor parallel oil cooling structure, effectively improving the cooling radiating efficiency of the motor, realizing high power and miniaturization of the motor. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Okochi by using an end plate provided in an axial end portion of the rotor, and a flow outlet passage provided in the end plate and extending in a radial direction, wherein the flow outlet passage includes an inner circumferential portion connecting to the downstream passage, and an outer circumferential end including a flow outlet oriented toward the coil end, as taught by Ying, to provide a motor with parallel oil cooling structure, using the motor stator and rotor parallel oil cooling structure, effectively improving the cooling radiating efficiency of the motor, realizing high power and miniaturization of the motor. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okochi (US PG Pub2017/0012503) as applied in claim 1 above, and further in view of Patterson (2,524,269). As to claim 7/1, Okochi teaches the claimed limitation as discussed above except wherein the rotor and the shaft are fixed by means of shrink-fitting. However Patterson teaches the rotor (34) and the shaft (38) are fixed by means of shrink-fitting (see column 2, lines 44-47), for the advantageous benefit of improving compactness. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to modify Okochi by using the rotor and the shaft are fixed by means of shrink-fitting, as taught by Patterson, to improve compactness. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES whose telephone number is (571)270-7850. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:30-2:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, OLUSEYE IWARERE can be reached at (571)270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSE A GONZALEZ QUINONES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834 July 10, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700767
ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695347
DYNAMOELECTRIC MACHINE AS A DRIVE OF AN ELECTRICALLY DRIVEN VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689251
MOTOR COOLING STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689249
ELECTRIC MOTOR
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689250
STATOR SEAT, STATOR ASSEMBLY, MOTOR, LIDAR, AND CARRIER SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+12.9%)
2y 5m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1177 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month