Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/942,014

FACIAL HAIR GROOMING TOOL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Examiner
HUYNH, COURTNEY NGUYEN
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allow Rate
41 granted / 96 resolved
-27.3% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+47.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
144
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.1%
+7.1% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 96 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Fellows (U.S. Publication No. 2022/0031039 A1). PNG media_image1.png 543 584 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 600 444 media_image2.png Greyscale In regard to claim 1, Fellows discloses a facial hair grooming tool (Figs. 1-2) comprising: a handle (handle in annotated Fig. 1) capable of being grasped by a user (para. 0014), the handle having a first side (1st side in annotated Fig. 2) facing a user’s hand when grasped (Fig. 2); a first comb (201 in Fig. 1) movably mounted in relation to the handle between a retracted position in relation to the handle and at least one use position (Figs. 1-2, paras. 0015-0016); and a second comb (203 in Fig. 1) movably mounted in relation to the handle between a retracted position in relation to the handle and at least one use position (Figs. 1-2, paras. 0015-0016). In regard to claim 2, Fellows discloses the invention of claim 1. Fellows further discloses further comprising: a brush (102b in annotated Fig. 2) positioned on a second side (2nd side in annotated Fig. 2) of the handle (handle in annotated Fig. 2) and opposite the first side (1st side in annotated Fig. 2) of the handle (Fig. 2). In regard to claim 3, Fellows discloses the invention of claim 2. Fellows further discloses wherein: in respective retracted positions, each of the first and second combs (201 and 203 in annotated Figs. 1 and 2) is retracted within a respective one of two sides of the handle (2nd side and 3rd side in annotated Fig. 1, Fig. 2, paras. 0015 and 0019); and in the respective retracted positions, the first and second combs are between the first side (1st side in annotated Fig. 2) of the handle and bristles of the brush (Fig. 2). In regard to claim 5, Fellows discloses the invention of claim 1. Fellows further discloses wherein the first comb (201 in Fig. 1) has bristles of a first width (para. 0014, small tooth comb) and the second comb (203 in Fig. 1) has bristles of a width different from the width of the first comb (para. 0014, large tooth comb), the first and second combs thereby having different respective functions (paras. 0003-0005). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fellows in view of Harewood (U.S. Publication No. 2007/0125397 A1). In regard to claim 4, Fellows discloses the invention of claim 3. Fellows does not disclose further comprising: a cover case configured to be removably affixed to the bristles of the brush. Harewood teaches an apparatus (Fig. 4) further comprising: a cover case (34 in annotated Fig. 4) capable of being removably affixed to the bristles of the brush (24 in Fig. 4, para. 0021). The references and the claimed invention are considered to be analogous to the claimed invention because they are in the same field of grooming brushes with additional comb parts. It would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the grooming tool of Fellows by adding the cover case capable of being removably affixed to the bristles of the brush as taught by Harewood in order to allow covering of the exposed brush (Harewood Fig. 4, para. 0021) to protect the brush while preventing contamination or dirtying of the brush. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Please see attached PTOL-892 form. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to COURTNEY N HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)272-7219. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30AM-5:00PM (EST) flex, 2nd Friday off. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eric Rosen can be reached at (571) 270-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /COURTNEY N HUYNH/Examiner, Art Unit 3772 /ERIC J ROSEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594145
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH ORTHOPEDIC FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12551319
Screw-attached Pick-up Dental Coping System and Methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12532951
APPLICATOR FOR APPLYING A HAIRCARE PRODUCT, AND ASSOCIATED APPLICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12527653
RIDGED DENTAL FLOSS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12527375
WIG APPARATUS HAVING ANTI-SLIP BAND
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+47.9%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 96 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month