Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/942,172

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CODE RATE MATCHING OF POLAR CODE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
Nov 10, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0155389
Examiner
MALEK, LEILA
Art Unit
2632
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Research & Business Foundation Sungkyunkwan University
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
553 granted / 695 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
718
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
76.2%
+36.2% vs TC avg
§102
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 695 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement submitted on 11/08/2024 has been considered and made of record by the examiner. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Objections Claim 6 is objected to because of the following informalities: as to claim 6, line 1, “the length of the bit to be transmitted” should be replaced by the length of the at least one information bit to be transmitted. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 8 is objected to because of the following informalities: as to claim 8, line 4, “reliabilituy” should be replaced by reliability. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: as to claim 14, line 1, “the length of the bit to be” should be replaced by the length of the at least one information bit to be. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jang et al. (hereinafter, referred to as Jang) (US 2020/0322083). As to claims 1 and 9, Jang discloses an apparatus for encoding a channel in a wireless communication system (see paragraphs 0003 and 0019), the apparatus comprising: a transceiver (see paragraph 0019); and at least one processor operably coupled to the transceiver (see paragraphs 0019 and 0186, and Fig. 18, blocks 1805 and 1810), the at least one processor configured to: determine a length of a mother code, based on a length of at least one information bit to be transmitted and a target code rate (see paragraph 0195, “codeword bit number” indicates the length of at least one information bit to be transmitted); determine, based on the length of the at least one information bit, at least one frozen bit to not transmit information among first bits included in an input source vector corresponding to the mother code (see paragraphs 0065 and 0195); allocate the at least one information bit to at least one second bit except for the determined at least one frozen bit among the first bits included in the input source vector (see paragraphs 0062-0065, 0113, 0122, and 0195); and generate a codeword by encoding, into a predetermined polar code, the input source vector to which the at least one information bit is allocated (see paragraphs 0056, 0101, 0103, 0107, 0110, 0119, 0125, and 0195). As to claims 2 and 10, Jang discloses that the at least one frozen bit is determined by a puncturing operation (see paragraphs 0125, 0130, and 0195). As to claims 3 and 11, Jang discloses that the at least one frozen bit is determined by a parameter indicating a state of a channel for transmitting the at least one information bit (see paragraph 0065). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 8 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jang, in view of Liu et al. (hereinafter, referred to as Liu) (US 2022/0116141). As to claims 8 and 16, Jang discloses all the subject matters claimed in claims 8 and 16, except for allocating the at least one information bit to the at least one second bit in an order of bits having high channel reliability, the bits corresponding to the at least one second bit. Liu, in the same field of endeavor, discloses a communication system using polar coding (see paragraph 0045). Liu further discloses allocating the at least one information bit to the at least one second bit in an order of bits having high channel reliability, the bits corresponding to the at least one second bit (see paragraph 0046). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention was made to modify the teachings of Jang, as suggested by Liu, in order to increase the performance of the communication system. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7 and 12-15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEILA MALEK whose telephone number is (571)272-8731. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am-4:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chieh Fan can be reached at 571-272-3042. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEILA . MALEK Examiner Art Unit 2632 /LEILA MALEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12652202
REDRIVER AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12647156
INTELLIGENT BEAMFORMING LEVERAGING SERVICE TYPE AND MOBILITY DYNAMICS OF INDIVIDUAL USERS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12647164
AREA-EFFICIENT POWER DETECTION SUBSYSTEM FOR PHASED ARRAY TRANSMITTER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640786
MESSAGE RELAY APPARATUS, ONBOARD APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, MESSAGE RELAY METHOD AND PROGRAM RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633997
COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE AND METHOD
1y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+7.7%)
2y 10m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 695 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month