Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/942,202

OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR NOISE MITIGATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
Sep 09, 2020 — provisional 63/076,249 +2 more
Examiner
HOWARD, RYAN D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
825 granted / 1037 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1050
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.3%
+8.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1037 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed 11/08/2024 fails to comply with 37 CFR 1.98(a)(2), which requires a legible copy of each cited foreign patent document; each non-patent literature publication or that portion which caused it to be listed; and all other information or that portion which caused it to be listed. It has been placed in the application file, but the information referred to therein has not been considered. Specifically, the C25 and C37 references do not appear to be previously cited in the parent applications and are not provided with the 11/08/2024 IDS. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 35-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 35 recites the limitation "the cylinder lens array" in line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The pairing of the collimation lens array and the diverger array appears to be the embodiment shown in figure 4. The cylinder lens array is a feature of a different embodiment, and the diverger array of this embodiment directly receives light from the collimation lens array (element 492, figure 4; see also paragraph 0082 of the USPGPub of this case which describes this feature). Therefore, for the purpose of examination the ‘cylinder lens array’ of claim 35 line 8 will be reinterpreted as the ‘collimation lens array’ of line 6. Claims 36-40 are rejected inasmuch as they depend from claim 35. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-34 are allowed. Claim 35 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 21-34, prior art does not teach the cross cylindrical array positioned to receive the light from the output couplers. See reasons for allowable subject matter in office action mailed 4/12/2023 in application 17/470916. Regarding claim 35, prior art does not teach the collimating array positioned to receive the light from the set of output couplers and a diverger array positioned to receive light from the collimating array. See reasons for allowable subject matter in office action mailed 4/12/2023 in application 17/470916. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN D HOWARD whose telephone number is (571)270-5358. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minh-Toan Ton can be reached at 5712722303. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN D HOWARD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2882 9/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12730369
PROJECTOR
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724285
SPECKLE-REDUCED ILLUMINATION FOR IMPROVED SCATTERING-BASED MICROSCOPY
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12724335
PROJECTION DEVICE, PROJECTION CONTROL METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717223
ILLUMINATION DEVICE, METHOD OF CONTROLLING ILLUMINATION DEVICE, AND PROJECTION DISPLAY APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12720025
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, DEVICE MANAGEMENT SERVER, CONTROL METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR DEVICE MANAGEMENT SERVER
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+12.8%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1037 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month