Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/942,305

MULTIFUNCTIONAL INTRAORAL IMAGING SYSTEM AND RELATED METHODS

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Examiner
BROWN JR, HOWARD D
Art Unit
2488
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
571 granted / 649 resolved
+30.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
668
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 649 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION 1. This Office Action is sent in response to Applicant s communication received on 11/08/2025 for application number 18/942,305. The Office herby acknowledges receipt of the following and placed of record in file: Specification, Drawings, Abstract, Oath/Declaration, and claims. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 2. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement 3. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/08/2025 is in accordance with provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting 5. The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP §§ 706.02(l)(1) - 706.02(l)(3) for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. 4. Claims 1-6, 8-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,137,881. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other: See Table: Application No.: 18/942,305 1. An imaging and display system, comprising: a base; a pole connected to and extending generally upward from the base; a camera operable to obtain images; a tray unit having a distal end and a proximal end and connected to the pole at its proximal end and extending generally laterally with respect to an axis of the pole; an upper arm having a distal end and a proximal end, the proximal end of the upper arm connected to the pole and extending in a generally upward direction with respect to the axis of the pole, a portion of the upper arm being curved; and a display connected to the distal end of the upper arm. Patent No.: 12,137,881 1. An imaging and display system, comprising: a base; a pole connected to and extending generally upward from the base; a tray unit having a distal end and a proximal end and connected to the pole at its proximal end and extending generally outward with respect to an axis of the pole, the distal end of the tray unit connected to a camera; an upper arm having a distal end and a proximal end, the proximal end of the upper arm connected to the pole and extending in a generally upward direction with respect to the axis of the pole, the distal end of the upper arm including a generally transverse direction with respect to the axis of the pole; and a display connected to the distal end of the upper arm. 2. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the camera is connected to the tray unit using a bend-and-stay mechanism. 2. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the camera is connected to the tray unit using a bend-and-stay mechanism. 3. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the upper arm is connected to the pole by way of a rotatable collar to allow the upper arm to rotate with respect to the pole. 3. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the upper arm is connected to the pole by way of a rotatable collar to allow the upper arm to rotate with respect to the pole. 4. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the display is connected to the distal end of the upper arm by way of a rotatable collar to allow the display to rotate with respect to the distal end of the upper arm. 4. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the display is connected to the distal end of the upper arm by way of a rotatable collar to allow the display to rotate with respect to the distal end of the upper arm. 5. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the pole is generally tubular. 5. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the pole is generally tubular. 6. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the tray unit is connected to the pole by way of an arm and a rotatable collar to allow rotation of the tray unit. 6. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the tray unit is connected to the pole by way of an arm and a rotatable collar to allow rotation of the tray unit. 7. The imaging and display system of claim 1, further comprising a secondary camera operable to obtain images. 8. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the pole includes a telescoping mechanism having a plurality of telescoping members interconnected using rotatable collars to allow for adjustment in height. 7. The imaging and display system of claim 1, wherein the pole is adjustable in height. 8. The imaging and display system of claim 7, wherein the pole includes a telescoping mechanism to allow for adjustment in height. 9. The imaging and display system of claim 8, wherein the pole further comprises a plurality of telescoping members interconnected using rotatable collars. 9. The imaging and display system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of wheels connected to the base. 10. The imaging and display system of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of wheels connected to the base. 10. The imaging and display system of claim 1, further comprising a controller and a wireless communications interface operable to wirelessly transmit image information obtained by the camera. 11. The imaging and display system of claim 1, further comprising a controller and a wireless communications interface operable to wirelessly transmit image information obtained by the camera. 11. The imaging and display system of claim 10, wherein the controller is operable to obtain previously stored patient information for displaying on the display. 12. The imaging and display system of claim 1, further comprising a foot operated controller operable to control the camera, the display, or a setting of the camera or the display. 12. The imaging and display system of claim 1, further comprising a foot operated controller operable to control the camera, the display, or a setting of the camera or the display. 13. An imaging and display system operable to provide intraoral imaging and display of intraoral images, the system comprising: a base; a pole connected to and extending generally upward from the base, the pole being adjustable in height; a camera operable to be positioned in an intraoral region of a patient and to obtain images of the intraoral region; a tray unit having a distal end and a proximal end and connected to the pole at its proximal end and extending generally outward with respect to an axis of the pole; an upper arm having a distal end and a proximal end, the proximal end of the upper arm connected to the pole and extending in a generally upward direction with respect to the axis of the pole, the distal end of the upper arm extending in a generally transverse direction with respect to the axis of the pole; and a display connected to the distal end of the upper arm, the display operable to display images of the intraoral region of the patient. 13. An imaging and display system operable to provide intraoral imaging and display of intraoral images, the system comprising: a base having a plurality of wheels connected thereto; a generally tubular shaped pole connected to and extending generally upward from the base, the pole being adjustable in height; a tray unit having a distal end and a proximal end and connected to the pole at its proximal end and extending generally outward with respect to an axis of the pole, the distal end of the tray unit connected to a camera, the camera being operable to be positioned in an intraoral region of a patient; an upper arm having a distal end and a proximal end, the proximal end of the upper arm connected to the pole and extending in a generally upward direction with respect to the axis of the pole, the distal end of the upper arm including a generally transverse direction with respect to the axis of the pole; and a display connected to the distal end of the upper arm, the display operable to display images of the intraoral region of the patient. 14. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the camera is connected to the tray unit using a bend-and-stay mechanism. 14. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the camera is connected to the tray unit using a bend-and-stay mechanism. 15. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the upper arm is connected to the pole by way of a rotatable collar to allow the upper arm to rotate with respect to the pole. 15. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the upper arm is connected to the pole by way of a rotatable collar to allow the upper arm to rotate with respect to the pole. 16. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the display is connected to the distal end of the upper arm by way of a rotatable collar to allow the display to rotate with respect to the distal end of the upper arm. 16. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the display is connected to the distal end of the upper arm by way of a rotatable collar to allow the display to rotate with respect to the distal end of the upper arm. 17. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the tray unit is connected to the pole by way of an arm and a rotatable collar to allow rotation of the tray unit. 17. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the tray unit is connected to the pole by way of an arm and a rotatable collar to allow rotation of the tray unit. 18. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the pole is generally tubular shaped and includes a telescoping mechanism having a plurality of telescoping members interconnected using rotatable collars to allow for adjustment in height. 18. The imaging and display system of claim 13, wherein the pole includes a telescoping mechanism having a plurality of telescoping members interconnected using rotatable collars to allow for adjustment in height. 19. The imaging and display system of claim 13, further comprising a controller and a wireless communications interface operable to wirelessly transmit image information obtained by the camera. 19. The imaging and display system of claim 13, further comprising a controller and a wireless communications interface operable to wirelessly transmit image information obtained by the camera. 20. The imaging and display system of claim 13, further comprising a foot operated controller operable to control the camera, the display, or a setting of the camera or the display. 20. The imaging and display system of claim 13, further comprising a foot operated controller operable to control the camera, the display, or a setting of the camera or the display. Allowable Subject Matter 5. Claims 1-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOWARD D BROWN JR whose telephone number is (571)272-4371. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 7:30AM - 5:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sathyanarayanan Perungavoor can be reached at 5712727455. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HOWARD D. BROWN JR Primary Examiner Art Unit 2488 /HOWARD D BROWN JR/Examiner, Art Unit 2488 25
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599286
POWER SOURCES FOR WIRELESS INTRAORAL SCANNERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601965
IMPROVED µ-LED PROJECTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ITS MANUFACTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596252
DISPLAY WINDOW AND VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593967
ENDOSCOPE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582307
Image Capturing Device And Image Capturing System
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+7.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 649 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month