Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/942,394

METHOD AND DEVICE USED IN COMMUNICATION NODE FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 09, 2024
Priority
May 11, 2022 — CN 202210510466.0 +2 more
Examiner
RAIMONDO, TRACY LAUREN
Art Unit
2474
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apogee Networks LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
60 granted / 69 resolved
+29.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+17.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
90
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
72.8%
+32.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§112
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 69 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Objections Claims 1-3, and 18-20 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 1, 19, and 20 must spell out abbreviated term for “RRC”, “SRB2”, “DRB”, and “MRB” at its first use in the claim set. Claim 2 must spell out abbreviated term for “fullI-RNTI” at its first use in the claim set. Claim 3 must spell out abbreviated term for “MT-SDT” at its first use in the claim set. Claim 18 must spell out abbreviated term for “SIB” at its first use in the claim set. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation "the phrase" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 3 recites the limitation "the phrase" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 6 recites the limitation "the target field" in lines 1 and 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 19 recites the limitation "the phrase" in line 10. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 4-5, 7-18, and 20 are allowed. Claim 19 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 2-3, and 6 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: in accordance with MPEP 1302.14, the Examiner is of the opinion the claim set filed by the Applicant is allowable over the prior art of record. Please see the explanations of the closest prior art below for additional evidence of the reasons for allowance in order to satisfy the record as a whole. Examiner notes a completed search of the available patent literature and non-patent literature has been conducted by the Examiner and none of the cited references below (which has been found to be the closest prior art) either suggest or disclose, the claimed subject matter as a whole alone or in any reasonable combination. Examiner notes U.S. Pub. No. 20240406846 to Wu et al. teaches receiving a first message in RRC inactive state, the first message comprising a first identifier, the first identifier being associated to the first node (par. 0080, teaches the UE 102 can determine whether the UL data for transmission during EDT qualifies for transmission in the inactive state in view of whether the UL data is associated with a radio bearer (e.g., DRB or SRB)), but does not disclose the action of setting a first field in the second message and determining whether each radio bearer in a first radio bearer set is to be resumed according to at least whether the first message indicates that the first node performs data transmission in the RRC inactive state. Examiner notes U.S. Pub. No. 20230075866 to Kim et al. teaches receiving a first message in RRC inactive state, the first message comprising a first identifier, the first identifier being associated to the first node…and performing data transmission in the RRC inactive state (fig. 2B and par. 0166, teaches the terminal may receive a downlink control message from the base station through the SRB1 and transmit uplink data of the radio bearer (or data transmission in the INACTIVE state)), but does not disclose the action of setting a first field in the second message and determining whether each radio bearer in a first radio bearer set is to be resumed according to at least whether the first message indicates that the first node performs data transmission in the RRC inactive state. Examiner notes U.S. Pub. No. 20220007423 to Agiwal et al. teaches determining whether each radio bearer in a first radio bearer set is to be resumed according to at least whether the first message indicates that the first node performs data transmission in the RRC inactive state (par. 0138, teaches the UE continues to remain in RRC_INACTIVE state and the user data transmitted/received in between reception of contention resolution identity and reception of RRCRelease message are ciphered and integrity protected (only for DRBs configured with UP integrity protection)), but does not disclose the action of setting a first field in the second message and determining whether each radio bearer in a first radio bearer set is to be resumed according to at least whether the first message indicates that the first node performs data transmission in the RRC inactive state. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACY LAUREN RAIMONDO whose telephone number is (703)756-5578. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30am - 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Thier can be reached at 571-272-2832. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRACY LAUREN RAIMONDO/Examiner, Art Unit 2474 /Michael Thier/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2474
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 09, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739871
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND TERMINAL DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739938
DRX-ENABLED MULTIPATH COMMUNICATIONS
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12712791
SIMULTANEOUS QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE MEASUREMENT CONFIGURATIONS FOR INCAPABLE USER EQUIPMENTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12701585
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SENDING DOWNLINK TRANSMISSION, METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING DOWNLINK TRANSMISSION, AND DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701621
COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+17.3%)
2y 10m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 69 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month