Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/944,279

OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
May 04, 2017 — RE 10-2017-0056769 +4 more
Examiner
MARTINEZ, JOSEPH P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
769 granted / 895 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
907
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
44.0%
+4.0% vs TC avg
§112
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 895 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being fully anticipated by Huang (US20160033742). Re claim 1, Huang teaches for example in Fig. 1 and Table 1, an optical imaging system, comprising: a first lens (110) comprising a refractive power (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0091); a second lens (120) comprising a refractive power (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0092); a third lens (130) comprising a refractive power (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0093); a fourth lens (160) comprising a convex object-side surface (161; Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0096); and a fifth lens (170) comprising a convex object-side surface (171; Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0097), wherein the first to fifth lenses are sequentially disposed from an object side toward an imaging plane (Fig. 1, Table 1), wherein an overall length (a distance from an object-side surface of the first lens to the imaging plane) of the optical imaging system is less than or equal to 6.0 mm (Table 1), and wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fourth lens is greater than a radius of curvature of an object-side surface of the first lens (Table 1). Re claim 2, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 1 and Table 1, the first lens has a convex object-side surface (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0091). Re claim 3, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 1 and Table 1, the second lens has a convex object-side surface (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0092). Re claim 4, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 1 and Table 1, the second lens has a concave image-side surface (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0092). Re claim 5, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 1 and Table 1, the third lens comprises a concave image-side surface (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0093). Re claim 6, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 1 and Table 1, the fourth lens has a concave image-side surface (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0096). Re claim 7, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 1 and Table 1, the fifth lens has a concave image-side surface (Fig. 1, Table 1; para. 0097). Re claim 8, Huang teaches for example in Fig. 9 and Table 9, an optical imaging system, comprising: a first lens (510) comprising a concave image-side surface (512; Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0170); a second lens (520) comprising a refractive power (Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0171); a third lens (530) comprising a refractive power (Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0172); a fourth lens (550) comprising a refractive power (Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0174); and a fifth lens (560) comprising a convex object-side surface (561; Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 017), wherein the first to fifth lenses are sequentially disposed from an object side toward an imaging plane (Fig. 9, Table 9), wherein a radius of curvature of the image-side surface of the first lens is greater than a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the third lens (Table 9), and wherein a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fifth lens is greater than a radius of curvature of an image-side surface of the fourth lens (Table 9). Re claim 9, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 9 and Table 9, the first lens has a convex object-side surface (Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0170). Re claim 10, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 9 and Table 9, the second lens has a concave image-side surface (Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0171). Re claim 11, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 9 and Table 9, the third lens comprises a concave image-side surface (Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0172). Re claim 12, Huang further teaches for example in Fig. 9 and Table 9, the fifth lens has a concave image-side surface (Fig. 9, Table 9; para. 0175). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Hsu et al. (US20130050847). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH P MARTINEZ whose telephone number is (571)272-2335. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9am to 7pm PACIFIC. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bumsuk Won can be reached at (571) 272-2713. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Joseph P Martinez/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872 9-19-26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748286
IMAGING OPTICAL SYSTEM, IMAGE CAPTURING DEVICE AND MOBILE TERMINAL
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12742949
IMAGING OPTICAL SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730310
HEAD-UP DISPLAY
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12724224
METHOD FOR CONSTRUCTING INITIAL STRUCTURE OF ATHERMAL OPTICAL SYSTEM BASED ON PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12717113
LENS DRIVING DEVICE AND CAMERA MODULE COMPRISING SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+3.2%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 895 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month