Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/944,350

IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
Nov 14, 2023 — JP 2023-193686
Examiner
RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ, LENNIN R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sharp Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
499 granted / 610 resolved
+21.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
621
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.8%
-29.2% vs TC avg
§103
58.8%
+18.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 610 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are generally narrative and indefinite, failing to conform with current U.S. practice. They appear to be a literal translation into English from a foreign document and are replete with grammatical and idiomatic errors. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kanno (US 2018/0063374). (1) regarding claims 1 and 9: Kanno ‘374 discloses an image forming apparatus (Fig. 1) comprising: a display (paragraph [0130]); and one or more controllers (CPU 1801 in Fig. 18), wherein the one or more controllers refer to first information associating user identification information identifying a user with print history information indicating presence or absence of print histories related to print jobs held by the image forming apparatus (paragraph [0055], where the print history is associated with a particular logged-in user, and presents the history table associated with each user), and control, on a basis of whether the print history information corresponding to the user identification information of a logged-in user who is logged in to the image forming apparatus indicates the presence of a print history of some of the print jobs (paragraph [0055], where print history table is associated with a logged-in user), whether to cause a first confirmation screen including information indicating at least one print job other the some of the print jobs to appear on the display (This limitation is not clear, thus the examiner is interpreting this limitation as directed to presenting a screen with confirmed jobs associated with the logged in user; in paragraph [0055] and [0093], where a screen is presented with associated jobs with a particular user). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: A. Claim 2 discloses the unique and distinct limitations of “wherein the some of the print jobs are resident jobs residing in the image forming apparatus”, either alone or in combination, the applied prior art does not teach the claimed subject matter. Claim 3 depends on claim 2, therefore a similar analysis applies. B. Claim 4 discloses the unique and distinct limitations of “wherein the one or more controllers refer to the first information, and cause, when the print history information corresponding to the user identification information of the logged-in user indicates that no print history is present for all of the print jobs and the number of print jobs corresponding to the user identification information of the logged-in user held by the image forming apparatus is fewer than a predetermine number, a second confirmation screen including information indicating one or more print jobs satisfying a predetermined condition among the print jobs fewer than the predetermined number to appear on the display”, either alone or in combination, the applied prior art does not teach the claimed subject matter. Claims 5-8 depend on claim 4, therefore a similar analysis applies. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LENNIN R RODRIGUEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1678. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9:00am-7:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abderrahim Merouan can be reached at 571-270-5254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LENNIN R RODRIGUEZGONZALEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2683
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743769
SHAPE CHARACTERISTIC VALUE ESTIMATION APPARATUS, SHAPE CHARACTERISTIC VALUE ESTIMATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12718514
IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND PRODUCT
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12693819
SERVER APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687841
METHOD AND ASSEMBLY FOR INSPECTING A PLURALITY OF ELEMENTS OF AN INDUSTRIAL PLANT
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12688387
PROVIDE INFORMATION ACCORDING TO STATUS OF DETECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.3%)
2y 11m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 610 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month