Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/944,469

TRANSIENT VOLTAGE SUPPRESSOR CIRCUIT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
Nov 20, 2023 — EU 23210880
Examiner
NGUYEN, DANNY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Infineon Technologies AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1225 granted / 1359 resolved
+30.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1385
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.0%
+16.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1359 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 1. Claims 1-5, 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Inoue (USPN 2007/0120193). Regarding claim 1, Inoue discloses a transient voltage suppressor (TVS) circuit (the transient protection circuit shown in figures 6, 7) comprising: a semiconductor substrate (a substrate 201, see figure 7) comprising a first TVS device (a Zener diode 101) and a second TVS device (a TVS device 103, see figures 6 7) electrically connected in series; and a resistor (a resistor 102), wherein the resistor (102) and at least one of the first TVS device (101) and the second TVS device (103) are electrically connected in parallel (see figure 6). Regarding claim 2, Inoue discloses wherein the TVS circuit is a discrete device (see figure 6). Regarding claim 3, Inoue discloses wherein the semiconductor substrate (201) comprises the resistor (the resistor 102 is equivalent to a resistor 207 shown in figures 7). Regarding claim 4, Inoue discloses wherein the resistor (201) is a resistive current path formed by a continuously p-doped (212 or 231, 233) or n-doped part (211, 213 or 232, 235) of the semiconductor substrate. (see figures 7, 11). Regarding claim 5, Inoue discloses wherein the resistive current path includes a part of the semiconductor substrate in an active area of the at least one of the first TVS device and the second TVS device (a top surface of the substrate 201 or 256 wherein the TVS device 103 or 230 formed). Regarding claim 14, Inoue discloses a method of manufacturing a transient voltage suppressor (TVS) circuit (see figure 6, 7), the method comprising: forming a first TVS device (a first TVS device 101 includes a layout structure 220) and a second TVS device (a second TVS device 103 includes a layout 221) in a semiconductor substrate (201), the first TVS device and the second TVS device being electrically connected in series (see figure 6); and providing a resistor (102), wherein the resistor and at least one of the first TVS device (101) and the second TVS device (103) are electrically connected in parallel . Regarding claim 15, Inoue discloses Regarding claim 3, Inoue discloses wherein the semiconductor substrate (201) comprises the resistor (the resistor 102 is equivalent to a resistor 207 shown in figures 7). 2. Claims 1-2, 6-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Chow et al (USPN 2014/0327048). Regarding claim 1, Chow discloses a transient voltage suppressor (TVS) circuit (the transient protection circuit 702 shown in figures 7, ), comprising: a semiconductor substrate (a substrate shown in figure 8 ) comprising a first TVS device (a diode 314) and a second TVS device (a TVS device 316, see figure 7) electrically connected in series; and a resistor (a resistor 312), wherein the resistor (312) and at least one of the first TVS device (314) and the second TVS device (316) are electrically connected in parallel (see figure 7). Regarding claim 2, Chow discloses wherein the TVS circuit (702) is a discrete device (see figure 7). Regarding claim 6, Chow discloses wherein the semiconductor substrate further comprises a third TVS device (716) and a fourth TVS device (714) electrically connected in series, and a second resistor (712), wherein the second resistor (712) and at least one of the third TVS device (716) and the fourth TVS device (714) are electrically connected in parallel (see figure 7). Regarding claim 7, Chow discloses wherein cross-section designs of the first TVS device (314) and the third TVS device (716) correspond to each other (see figure 8). Allowable Subject Matter 3. Claims 8-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 4. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANNY NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2054. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Monica Lewis can be reached at 571-271-1838. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANNY NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683379
OVERCURRENT PROTECTION DEVICE AND CHARGING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12671353
MICROSTRUCTURED FIELD EFFECT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671246
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROTECTION OF ELECTRIC NETWORKS AND DEVICES FROM EXTREME TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC SURGES
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665589
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT COMPRISING A HOTSPOT DETECTION CIRCUIT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665115
SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNET DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month