Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/944,729

SEAT BEAM FOR A ROTARY-WING AIRCRAFT ADAPTED FOR RECEIVING SEAT POSTS OF A SEAT BENCH DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
Feb 23, 2024 — EU 24315056.2
Examiner
MORRIS, TAYLOR L
Art Unit
3631
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Airbus SAS
OA Round
2 (Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
422 granted / 709 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +36% interview lift
Without
With
+35.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
739
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
28.9%
-11.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 709 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Application Claims 1-20 are pending and have been examined in this application. As of the date of this application, the Information Disclosure Statement(s) (IDS) filed on 03/19/2025 has/have been taken into account. Response to Amendment In the amendment dated 04/28/2026, the following has occurred: No claims have been amended; No claims have been canceled; Claims 16-20 have been added. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see pg. 9 (specifically the argument regarding Trickey not being adapted for receiving multiple seat posts), filed 04/28/2026, with respect to the 102 and 103 rejections of claims 1-15 based on Trickey have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 102 and 103 rejections of claims 1-15 have been withdrawn. Claim Objections Claims 18-20 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75 as being a substantial duplicate of claims 1 and 14-15, respectively. When two claims in an application are duplicates or else are so close in content that they both cover the same thing, despite a slight difference in wording, it is proper after allowing one claim to object to the other as being a substantial duplicate of the allowed claim. See MPEP § 608.01(m). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 16 recites that “the link working line intersects each of the first link rotational axis and the second link rotational axis” and claim 17 recites that “the first link rotational axis, the second link rotational axis, and the link working line are arranged in a common plane”. However, claim 1 recites “ a second link rotational axis that is parallel to the first link rotational axis, wherein the link working line is perpendicular to and passes through the first link rotational axis and the second link rotational axis”. If the two link rotational axes are parallel and the link working line is perpendicular to them and pass through said axes, it both intersects said axes and is in a common plane with said axes. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-15 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See PTO-892 for cited references. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Taylor Morris whose telephone number is (571)272-6367. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10AM-6PM PST / 1PM-9PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Liu can be reached at (571) 272-8227. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Taylor Morris/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3631
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 28, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727664
TABLE FRAME AND TABLE
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731974
AN ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING A CABLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726010
CORD HOLDER FOR A KITCHEN APPLIANCE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12723708
DISPLAY MOUNT WITH ADJUSTABLE WALL ATTACHMENT
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703988
TEMPORARY BRACE SYSTEM FOR A STRUCTURE
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+35.5%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 709 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month