Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/944,737

Uplink Link Adaptation in 5G Base Stations

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
Apr 02, 2020 — provisional 63/004,087 +2 more
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, FAHMIDA S
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Parallel Wireless Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
599 granted / 644 resolved
+33.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
653
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
42.1%
+2.1% vs TC avg
§102
31.7%
-8.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 644 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTIONThis action is in response to the application filed on 11/12/2024. Claims 1-7 are pending for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 4, 5 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 4 and 5 recite the limitation "a power of each RB" in line 1. "a power of each RB" was recited before in claim 1, so there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claims. Claim 7 recites the limitation “a wideband RSSI” in line 1. “a wideband RSSI” was recited before in claim 1, there is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Clarification and appropriate corrections are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) (2) as being anticipated by YOON et al. (US 20190149253). As of claim 1, YOON discloses a method for computing Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) (YOON, Abstract, para [0013] discloses the UE measure RSSI in RSSI measurement OFDM symbols based on the configuration information about the RSSI measurement resource (= computing Received Signal Strength Indicator), comprising: computing a power of each Resource Block (RB) in a given symbol separately for all the Orthogonal Frequency division Multiplexing (OFDM) symbols in a subframe and for each antenna (YOON, [0027] [FIG. 1] a subframe structure, para [0014] discloses transmitting RSSI measurement resource information including configuration information on one or more time resource units (=resource blocks) for received signal strength indicator (RSSI) measurement and including RSSI measurement symbol (=given symbol) information indicating orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols for RSSI measurement among OFDM symbols of the RSSI measurement time resource, para [0018], claim 1: discloses each of the RSSI measurement time resource units (=resource block) consist of a plurality of consecutive OFDM symbols and measuring an RSSI (=computing a power) based on the RSSI measurement symbol information in a time resource unit and para [0072] [0063] disclose RSSI is measured over all OFDM symbols in the indicated subframes. OFDM symbols containing reference symbols for antenna port 0, in the measurement bandwidth, over N number of resource blocks which corresponds to computing a power of each Resource Block (RB) in a given symbol separately for all the (OFDM) symbols in a subframe and for each antenna); averaging a first value across all the symbols in a subframe for each antenna to get a second value (YOON, para [0072] [0063] disclose RSSI is measured over all OFDM symbols in the indicated subframes, Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), comprises the linear average of the total received power (=first value) observed only in OFDM symbols containing reference symbols for antenna port 0, in the measurement bandwidth, over N number of resource blocks by the UE from all sources which corresponds to averaging a first value to get a second value); and wherein a Wideband RSSI is obtained by averaging across all RBs (YOON para [0072] [0074] discloses the received wide band power, average of the total received power observed only in OFDM symbols para [0075] [0076] discloses RSSI has been configured to be measured in all OFDM symbols of configured subframes. RSSI is measured in a frequency bandwidth of a receiver of the UE. The network designates a bandwidth for RSSI measurement as a broad band to cause the UE to measure RSSI). As of claim 2, rejection of claim 1 cited above incorporated herein, in addition YOON discloses the first value comprises a RssiPerRB (para [0111] discloses calculate RSSI per RE (=RssiPerRB) in the configured time/frequency resource). As of claim 3, rejection of claim 1 cited above incorporated herein, in addition YOON discloses the second value comprises a RssiperRBperSF[rbIndex] (para [0072] discloses E-UTRA Carrier Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), comprises the linear average of the total received power observed only in OFDM symbols containing reference symbols in the measurement bandwidth, over N number of resource blocks by the UE from all sources, RSSI is measured over all OFDM symbols(=RssiperRB) in the indicated subframe and Fig. 1 shows Symbol index and RB index). As of claim 4, rejection of claim 1 cited above incorporated herein, in addition YOON discloses computing a power of each RB in a given symbol separately for all the OFDM symbols in a subframe and for each Antenna (para [0018], claim 1: discloses each of the RSSI measurement time resource units (=resource block) consist of a plurality of consecutive OFDM symbols and measuring an RSSI (=computing a power) based on the RSSI measurement symbol information in a time resource unit and para [0072] [0063] disclose RSSI is measured over all OFDM symbols in the indicated subframes. OFDM symbols containing reference symbols for antenna port 0 (=each antenna) in the measurement bandwidth, over N number of resource blocks Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if the Applicant overcome the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph rejection and rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claim 5, the prior arts of record do not teach or reasonably suggest the limitation “computing a power of each RB in a given symbol separately for all the OFDM symbols in a subframe and for each Antenna comprises: PNG media_image1.png 189 975 media_image1.png Greyscale with the claimed invention as a whole. As to claim 6, the prior arts of record do not teach or reasonably suggest the limitation “averaging the RssiPerRB across all the symbols in a subframe for each antenna to get PNG media_image2.png 152 704 media_image2.png Greyscale “with the claimed invention as a whole. As to claim 7, the prior arts of record do not teach or reasonably suggest the limitation “a wideband RSSI is obtained by averaging across all RBs PNG media_image3.png 90 533 media_image3.png Greyscale “with the claimed invention as a whole. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FAHMIDA S CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)272-2547. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am to 5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sujoy K Kundu can be reached at 571-272-8586. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAHMIDA S CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2471
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745204
RESOURCE SET PROCESSING PRIORITIZATION DETERMINATION BASED ON RESOURCE INDEX INFORMATION
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745227
RESOURCE POOL CONFIGURATION METHODS AND APPARATUSES AND STORAGE MEDIA
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739180
METHOD FOR REPORTING QOE MEASUREMENT REPORTS, AND DEVICE, APPARATUS AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733063
MANAGING DATA COMMUNICATION IN A DISTRIBUTED BASE STATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726245
QoS CONTROL METHOD, DEVICE AND PROCESSOR READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 644 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month