Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/945,320

DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS IN WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
Nov 23, 2015 — CN 201510823977.8 +6 more
Examiner
RENNER, BRANDON M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
776 granted / 956 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
1009
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
52.4%
+12.4% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 956 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-28 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-28 of U.S. Patent No. 12244447. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because patent 12244447 anticipates the limitations of the instant application as shown in the table below. Claim 1 of instant application Claim 1 of patent 12244447 A method for channel estimation information transmission, the method comprising: determining, by an apparatus, a long training field (LTF) sequence in a frequency domain according to a transmission bandwidth (BW) and a mode of a LTF field; and sending, by the apparatus, a time-domain signal according to the LTF sequence in the frequency domain and a number of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols of the LTF field; wherein the LTF sequence in the frequency domain in a 1× LTF mode over a bandwidth that includes one or more 80 MHz channels comprises any combination of the following: a left part of a long training field sequence of a 80 MHz channel (L-LTF.sub.80 MHz_A), a right part of the long training field sequence of the 80 MHz channel (R-LTF.sub.80 MHz_A), −L-LTF.sub.80 MHz_A, Or −R-LTF.sub.80 MHz_A; wherein the L-LTF.sub.80 MHz_A comprises {−1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1} on subcarriers with every fourth index; and wherein the R-LTF.sub.80 MHz_A comprises {−1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1} on subcarriers with every fourth index. A method for channel estimation information transmission, the method comprising: determining, by an apparatus, a long training field (LTF) sequence in a frequency domain according to a transmission bandwidth (BW) and a mode of a LTF field; and sending, by the apparatus, a time-domain signal according to the LTF sequence in the frequency domain and a number of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) symbols of the LTF field; wherein the LTF sequence in the frequency domain in a 1× LTF mode over a bandwidth that includes multiple 80 MHz channels that comprises any combination of the following: a left part of a long training field sequence of a 80 MHz channel (L-LTF.sub.80MHz_A), a right part of the long training field sequence of the 80 MHz channel (R-LTF.sub.80MHz_A), −L-LTF.sub.80MHz_A, or −R-LTF.sub.800MHZ_A; wherein the L-LTF.sub.800MHz_A comprises {−1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1} on subcarriers with every fourth index; and wherein the R-LTF.sub.80MHZ_A comprises {−1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, +1, +1, +1, +1, −1, −1, +1, +1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, −1, +1, −1, +1, −1, −1, −1, +1, +1} on subcarriers with every fourth index. The claims of the instant application are all rejected under non-statutory double patenting over the following: Claims 1-16 of US Patent 10686640 Claims 1-12 of US Patent 11677606 Claims 1-16 of US Patent 10999119 Appropriate correction required. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRANDON M RENNER whose telephone number is (571)270-3621. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7am-5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at (571)-272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRANDON M RENNER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750823
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR COVERAGE ENHANCEMENT IN WIRELESS NETWORKS
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744589
TIME OFFSET MAINTENANCE FOR NONTERRESTRIAL NETWORK (NTN)
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745108
MEASUREMENT METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739712
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING EFFICIENT CELL SEARCH IN CELLULAR NETWORKS USING IRAT FREQUENCIES
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739084
DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.9%)
3y 1m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 956 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month