Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/946,020

ELECTRONIC DEVICE OF VEHICLE FOR RECORDING OPERATION INTENSITY OF PEDAL BASED ON IMAGE AND OPERATING METHOD OF THE SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 13, 2024
Examiner
HUYNH, HAI H
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Thinkware Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
1154 granted / 1236 resolved
+23.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
1247
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§102
61.1%
+21.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1236 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Inventorship This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 7-13 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Niveditha et al (EP 4245618) in view of Chen (WO 2023/174026). Niveditha et al teaches analyzing (see [0043]) an image for a pedal and detecting a location of the pedal; determining the operation intensity of the pedal based on the location; and storing the operation intensity (see figures 2, 4, [0043] – [0045], [0054]). Niveditha et al does not teach a video for a pedal. Chen teaches a video for detecting the pedal position (see paragraph 1 of mode for invention also claim 1 of ‘026). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to employ the video camera on the pedal detection device of Niveditha et al as taught by Chen in order to improve the accuracy of detecting the position of the pedal. For claims 2, 12 (see [0023] of ‘618). For claims 3, 13 (see [0016] of ‘618). For claims 7-10, 17-20 (see [0056] – [0057] of ‘618). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-6, 14-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAI H HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)272-4844. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00 AM-4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay M Low can be reached at 571-272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAI H HUYNH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 13, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600294
TANKER TRUCK WITH REAR LIGHTING ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF OPERATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600346
BRAKE-TO-STEER LATERAL STABILITY MANAGEMENT BASED ON STABILITY INDICATOR CORRELATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600328
Trailer Vehicle Control System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589656
TRAILER BRAKE GAIN BASED ON REGENERATIVE BRAKE CAPACITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583398
Positioning Assist Device and Positioning Assist Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.8%)
2y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1236 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month