Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/946,536

DISTRIBUTED LIGHTING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND COLOR CORRECTION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 13, 2024
Examiner
LUONG, HENRY T
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Axis Innovations, LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allow Rate
487 granted / 648 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+39.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
663
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
63.1%
+23.1% vs TC avg
§102
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 648 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remarks This Office Action is in response to the application filed on 11/13/24. Examiner acknowledged that claims 1-20 are pending. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted 11/13/24 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claims 1, 8 and 15 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 ln3, “a plurality of smart lights” should be –the plurality of smart lights-- Claim 8 ln5, “a plurality of smart lights” should be –the plurality of smart lights-- Claim 15 ln8, “a plurality of smart lights” should be –the plurality of smart lights-- Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5, 7-10, 12, 14-17 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bora (US 2013/0063042). Regarding Claim 1, Bora teaches a method for implementing a lighting program ([0194] “sunrise”) by a plurality of smart lights (Fig. 25. IID1-8), the method comprising: receiving, from a controller (Fig. 25: 2550), one or more parameters of a lighting program at a plurality of smart lights (Fig. 25: IID1-8), each smart light having a light index ([0201] “All number of II Devices would include scenes all off and all on related to turning all II Devices off within the addressable network, or turning all II Devices on. As example, for any lighting network containing a group of lights with the word "TV", "Television", "movie", "film", or related word, the application would suggest a lighting scene related to watching a movie, such as a soft blue light emitted from each of the II Devices”); storing (Fig. 1: 108) the one or more parameters of the lighting program; receiving, from the controller, a preliminary synchronization signal ([0256] “When launching the Music Sync application, the application would look for addressable lights”). Bora does not explicitly teach in Fig. 1 initiating a timer based on the preliminary synchronization signal; configuring a rendering algorithm based on input including at least the light index, the one or more parameters of the lighting program, and a current time on the timer; executing the rendering algorithm to determine a frame value; and implementing a lighting output consistent with the determined frame value. However, [0257] teaches “At any time, the user will be able to reconfigure the arrangement or light themes, 5422…device application will interpret the music file wavelengths to send continuing commands to each II Device previously selected to turn on and off, adjust brightness, and change colors depending on the music construct within that channel at that time and the selected arrangement and theme”; [0261] “When the sunrise program is active, the program will be executed similar to any other automation or alarm program. The suggested colors used in the sunrise program will most likely include orange and red colors that would brighten over time until fully lit when the alarm or timer condition is met. Blue LEDs might also be included to provide the short wavelength light mimicking that of the sun”. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bora in order to use the sync signal to sync light to music as well as initiate a sunrise timer for the mimicking sunrise since this would allow a user to create a profile and the user can wake up to a gentle calming music as the sunrises. Therefore, the subject matter claimed would have been obvious in view of Bora. Regarding Claim 2, Bora teaches the method of claim 1, except transmitting, from the plurality of smart lights to the controller, a confirmation of receipt of the one or more parameters of the lighting program. However, Bora teaches a mesh network. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Bora in order to transmit a confirmation of receipt message since mesh network communication includes ACK messaging. Regarding Claim 3, Bora teaches the method of claim 2, wherein the confirmation of receipt of the one or more parameters of the lighting program is wirelessly transmitted to the controller as a modified 2.4 GHz WiFi packet ([0090] “the communications means might utilize other protocols including but not limited to ZigBee, WiFi, infrared, WiMax, LTE, ZWave, or other protocols not listed”). Regarding Claim 5, Bora teaches the method of claim 1, wherein the rendering algorithm is executing with an updated current time input at predetermined intervals to determine the frame value ([0203] “a `time to sleep` scene might turn off all the II Devices in the network, except for one II Device on very low blue light in a child's bedroom, and activate the II Device alarms for all bedrooms in the house for a certain time”). Regarding Claim 7, Bora teaches the method of claim 1, wherein each smart light in the plurality of smart lights has a unique light index ([0074] “A user has the flexibility to personalize the color, atmosphere, and mood of a room to better fit ones preference, time of day, or occasion at hand). Regarding Claim 8, Bora teaches one or more non-transitory computer-readable media (Fig. 1: 108) comprising one or more computer-readable instructions (Fig. 26-37) that, when executed by one or more processors of a computing device (Fig. 25: 2548; [0076] “An II Device is a single wirelessly enabled lighting apparatus. A wireless device is a computing device such as a smartphone, computer, tablet”; [0178] “remote wireless device RD 2548 would originate the commands and then the localized wireless device WD1 2550 would act as the first network level of the mesh network…remote wireless device (RD) 2548 could be another embodiment of II Device 140”), cause the computing device to perform a method for implementing a lighting program by a plurality of smart lights (Fig. 25: IID1-8), the method comprising: receiving, from a controller (Fig. 25: 2550), one or more parameters of a lighting program at a plurality of smart lights, each smart light having a light index ([0201] “All number of II Devices would include scenes all off and all on related to turning all II Devices off within the addressable network, or turning all II Devices on. As example, for any lighting network containing a group of lights with the word "TV", "Television", "movie", "film", or related word, the application would suggest a lighting scene related to watching a movie, such as a soft blue light emitted from each of the II Devices”); storing the one or more parameters of the lighting program ([0088] “memory 108 stores data from factory defined settings and from user defined setting”); receiving, from the controller, a preliminary synchronization signal ([0256] “When launching the Music Sync application, the application would look for addressable lights”). Bora does not explicitly teach in Fig. 1 initiating a timer based on the preliminary synchronization signal; configuring a rendering algorithm based on input including at least the light index, the one or more parameters of the lighting program, and a current time on the timer; executing the rendering algorithm to determine a frame value; and implementing a lighting output consistent with the determined frame value. However, [0257] teaches “At any time, the user will be able to reconfigure the arrangement or light themes, 5422…device application will interpret the music file wavelengths to send continuing commands to each II Device previously selected to turn on and off, adjust brightness, and change colors depending on the music construct within that channel at that time and the selected arrangement and theme”; [0261] “When the sunrise program is active, the program will be executed similar to any other automation or alarm program. The suggested colors used in the sunrise program will most likely include orange and red colors that would brighten over time until fully lit when the alarm or timer condition is met. Blue LEDs might also be included to provide the short wavelength light mimicking that of the sun”. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bora in order to use the sync signal to sync light to music as well as initiate a sunrise timer for the mimicking sunrise since this would allow a user to create a profile and the user can wake up to a gentle calming music as the sunrises. Therefore, the subject matter claimed would have been obvious in view of Bora. Regarding Claim 9, Bora teaches the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8, except transmitting, from the plurality of smart lights to the controller, a confirmation of receipt of the one or more parameters of the lighting program. However, Bora teaches a mesh network. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Bora in order to transmit a confirmation of receipt message since mesh network communication includes ACK messaging. Regarding Claim 10, Bora teaches the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 9, wherein the confirmation of receipt of the one or more parameters of the lighting program is wirelessly transmitted to the controller as a modified 2.4 GHz WiFi packet ([0090] “the communications means might utilize other protocols including but not limited to ZigBee, WiFi, infrared, WiMax, LTE, ZWave, or other protocols not listed”). Regarding Claim 12, Bora teaches the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8, wherein the rendering algorithm is executing with an updated current time input at predetermined intervals to determine the frame value ([0203] “a `time to sleep` scene might turn off all the II Devices in the network, except for one II Device on very low blue light in a child's bedroom, and activate the II Device alarms for all bedrooms in the house for a certain time”). Regarding Claim 14, Bora teaches the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8, wherein each smart light in the plurality of smart lights has a unique light index ([0074] “A user has the flexibility to personalize the color, atmosphere, and mood of a room to better fit ones preference, time of day, or occasion at hand). Regarding Claim 15, Bora teaches a computing device (Fig. 25: 2548; [0076] “An II Device is a single wirelessly enabled lighting apparatus. A wireless device is a computing device such as a smartphone, computer, tablet”; [0178] “remote wireless device RD 2548 would originate the commands and then the localized wireless device WD1 2550 would act as the first network level of the mesh network…remote wireless device (RD) 2548 could be another embodiment of II Device 140”) comprising: one or more processors (Fig. 1: 106); and one or more non-transitory computer-readable media (Fig. 1: 108) comprising one or more computer-readable instructions ([0088] “memory 108 stores data from factory defined settings and from user defined settings”) that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computing device to perform a method for implementing a lighting program by a plurality of smart lights (Fig. 25: IID1-8), the method comprising: receiving, from a controller (Fig. 25: 2550), one or more parameters of a lighting program at a plurality of smart lights, each smart light having a light index ([0201] “All number of II Devices would include scenes all off and all on related to turning all II Devices off within the addressable network, or turning all II Devices on. As example, for any lighting network containing a group of lights with the word "TV", "Television", "movie", "film", or related word, the application would suggest a lighting scene related to watching a movie, such as a soft blue light emitted from each of the II Devices”); storing the one or more parameters of the lighting program ([0088] “memory 108 stores data from factory defined settings and from user defined setting”); receiving, from the controller, a preliminary synchronization signal ([0256] “When launching the Music Sync application, the application would look for addressable lights”). Bora does not explicitly teach in Fig. 1 initiating a timer based on the preliminary synchronization signal; configuring a rendering algorithm based on input including at least the light index, the one or more parameters of the lighting program, and a current time on the timer; executing the rendering algorithm to determine a frame value; and implementing a lighting output consistent with the determined frame value. However, [0257] teaches “At any time, the user will be able to reconfigure the arrangement or light themes, 5422…device application will interpret the music file wavelengths to send continuing commands to each II Device previously selected to turn on and off, adjust brightness, and change colors depending on the music construct within that channel at that time and the selected arrangement and theme”; [0261] “When the sunrise program is active, the program will be executed similar to any other automation or alarm program. The suggested colors used in the sunrise program will most likely include orange and red colors that would brighten over time until fully lit when the alarm or timer condition is met. Blue LEDs might also be included to provide the short wavelength light mimicking that of the sun”. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to combine the teachings of Bora in order to use the sync signal to sync light to music as well as initiate a sunrise timer for the mimicking sunrise since this would allow a user to create a profile and the user can wake up to a gentle calming music as the sunrises. Therefore, the subject matter claimed would have been obvious in view of Bora. Regarding Claim 16, Bora teaches the computing device of claim 15, except transmitting, from the plurality of smart lights to the controller, a confirmation of receipt of the one or more parameters of the lighting program. However, Bora teaches a mesh network. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling of the claimed invention to combine the teaching of Bora in order to transmit a confirmation of receipt message since mesh network communication includes ACK messaging. Regarding Claim 17, Bora teaches the computing device of claim 6, wherein the confirmation of receipt of the one or more parameters of the lighting program is wirelessly transmitted to the controller as a modified 2.4 GHz WiFi packet ([0090] “the communications means might utilize other protocols including but not limited to ZigBee, WiFi, infrared, WiMax, LTE, ZWave, or other protocols not listed”). Regarding Claim 19, Bora teaches the computing device of claim 15, wherein the rendering algorithm is executing with an updated current time input at predetermined intervals to determine the frame value ([0203] “a `time to sleep` scene might turn off all the II Devices in the network, except for one II Device on very low blue light in a child's bedroom, and activate the II Device alarms for all bedrooms in the house for a certain time”). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 6, 11, 13, 18 and 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HENRY T LUONG whose telephone number is (571)270-7008. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday: 8:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Regis Betsch can be reached at (571) 270-7101. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Henry Luong/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597698
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586905
ANTENNA AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, AND ANTENNA SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588119
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES FOR CREATING A CUSTOM OUTPUT SPECTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583379
VEHICLE PERIPHERY MONITORING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586758
POWER DELIVERY TO A PLASMA VIA INDUCTIVE COUPLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 648 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month