Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/947,276

PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE SHEET

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Nov 20, 2023 — JP 2023-196371
Examiner
GOLDEN, CHINESSA T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NITTO DENKO Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
62%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
403 granted / 699 resolved
-2.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
727
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
66.9%
+26.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 699 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yonezaki et al. (WO2019/159381) in view of Niwa et al. (US Patent Application No. 2017/0218232). Regarding claim 1, Yonezaki et al. teach a pressure sensitive adhesive sheet (paragraph [0005]) that comprises a pressure sensitive adhesive layer (paragraph [0005]) formed from a water dispersed pressure adhesive composition (paragraph [0069]) comprising an acrylic polymer as a base polymer (paragraph [0050]), and a support substrate sheet having first and second faces, supporting the pressure sensitive adhesive layer at least on the first face (paragraphs [0005], [0016]), wherein the substrate comprises a layer forming the first face (paragraphs [0016], [0078]) and the layer comprises an ether based polyurethane (paragraphs [0078], [0080]). Yonezaki et al. fail to teach wherein the substrate comprises a colored layer. However, Niwa et al. teach a pressure sensitive adhesive sheet (page 1, paragraphs [0003], [0008]) that comprises a pressure sensitive adhesive layer (page 1, paragraph [0008]) formed from a water dispersed pressure sensitive adhesive composition comprising an acrylic polymer as a base polymer (page 1, paragraph [0010], page 11, paragraph [0130]) and a support substrate sheet having first and second faces, supporting the pressure sensitive adhesive layer at least on the first face (page 1, paragraph [0015]), wherein the substrate comprises a colored layer forming the first face (page 1, paragraph [0015], page 14, paragraph [0157]), and the colored layer comprises a polyurethane (page 13, paragraphs [0141], [0143]). It would have been obvious to a person of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the colored layer of Niwa et al. on the substrate of Yonezaki et al. in order to bring about desirable design or optical properties in the PSA sheet (page 14, paragraph [0157]). Regarding claim 2, Yonezaki et al. teach wherein the acrylic polymer is crosslinked with one species or a combination of two or more species of crosslinking agents selected among oxazoline-based crosslinking agent, carbodiimide-based crosslinking agents, epoxy-based crosslinking agents and isocyanate-based crosslinking agents (paragraphs [0050], [0070]). Regarding claim 3, Yonezaki et al. teach wherein the pressure sensitive adhesive layer has a thickness of 1 µm to 20 µm which reads on Applicant’s claimed range of 10 µm or greater and 50 µm or less (paragraph [0011]). Regarding 4, Yonezaki et al. fail to teach wherein the substrate comprises a first colored layer forming the first face and a second colored layer forming the second face, and a first pressure sensitive adhesive layer is placed on the first face of the substrate and a second pressure sensitive adhesive layer is placed on the second face of the substrate. However, Niwa et al. teach a pressure sensitive adhesive sheet (page 1, paragraphs [0003], [0008]) that comprises a pressure sensitive adhesive layer (page 1, paragraph [0008]) formed from a water dispersed pressure sensitive adhesive composition comprising an acrylic polymer as a base polymer (page 1, paragraph [0010], page 11, paragraph [0130]) and a support substrate sheet having first and second faces, supporting the pressure sensitive adhesive layer at least on the first face (page 1, paragraph [0015]), wherein the substrate comprises a colored layer forming the first face (page 1, paragraph [0015], page 14, paragraph [0157]), and the colored layer comprises a polyurethane (page 13, paragraphs [0141], [0143]), wherein the substrate comprises a first colored layer forming the first face and a second colored layer forming the second face, and a first pressure sensitive adhesive layer is placed on the first face of the substrate and a second pressure sensitive adhesive layer is placed on the second face of the substrate (page 1, paragraph [0015], page 14, paragraph [0157]). It would have been obvious to a person of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the colored layers of Niwa et al. on the substrate of Yonezaki et al. in order to bring about desirable design or optical properties in the PSA sheet (page 14, paragraph [0157]). Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Niwa et al. (US Patent Application No. 2017/0218232) in view of Yonezaki et al. (WO2019/159381). Regarding claim 1, Niwa et al. teach a pressure sensitive adhesive sheet (page 1, paragraphs [0003], [0008]) that comprises a pressure sensitive adhesive layer (page 1, paragraph [0008]) formed from a water dispersed pressure sensitive adhesive composition comprising an acrylic polymer as a base polymer (page 1, paragraph [0010], page 11, paragraph [0130]) and a support substrate sheet having first and second faces, supporting the pressure sensitive adhesive layer at least on the first face (page 1, paragraph [0015]), wherein the substrate comprises a colored layer forming the first face (page 1, paragraph [0015], page 14, paragraph [0157]), and the colored layer comprises a polyurethane (page 13, paragraphs [0141], [0143]). Niwa et al. fail to teach wherein the polyurethane is an ether-based polyurethane. However, Yonezaki et al. teach a pressure sensitive adhesive sheet (paragraph [0005]) that comprises a pressure sensitive adhesive layer (paragraph [0005]) formed from a water dispersed pressure adhesive composition (paragraph [0069]) comprising an acrylic polymer as a base polymer (paragraph [0050]), and a support substrate sheet having first and second faces, supporting the pressure sensitive adhesive layer at least on the first face (paragraphs [0005], [0016]), wherein the substrate comprises a layer forming the first face (paragraphs [0016], [0078]) and the layer comprises an ether based polyurethane (paragraphs [0078], [0080]). It would have been obvious to a person of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the ether-based polyurethane of Yonezaki et al. as the substrate of Niwa et al. in order to provide heat stability and lightness of weight (Yonezaki et al., paragraph [0081]). Regarding claim 2, Niwa et al. teach wherein the acrylic polymer (page 1, paragraph [0010], page 11, paragraph [0130]) is crosslinked with one species or two or more species of crosslinking agents selected among oxazoline-based crosslinking agents, carbodiimide-based crosslinking agents, epoxy-based crosslinking agents and isocyanate-based crosslinking agents (page 10, paragraph [0116]). Regarding claim 3, Niwa et al. teach wherein the pressure sensitive adhesive layer has a thickness of 150 µm or less and 5 µm or greater which reads on Applicant’s claimed range of 10 µm or greater and 50 µm or less (page 12, paragraph [0136]). Regarding claim 4, Niwa et al. teach wherein the substrate comprises a first colored layer forming the first face and a second colored layer forming the second face, and a first pressure sensitive adhesive layer is placed on the first face of the substrate and a second pressure sensitive adhesive layer is placed on the second face of the substrate (page 1, paragraph [0015], page 14, paragraph [0157]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHINESSA GOLDEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5543. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday - Friday; 8:00 - 4:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alicia Chevalier can be reached on 571-272-1490. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see https://ppair-my.uspto.gov/pair/PrivatePair. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Chinessa T. Golden/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1788 8/3/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703777
LAMINATE
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12703169
CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITES AND THEIR PREFORMS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698595
HPMC COMPOSITION FOR COATING OF PAPER AND BOARD FOR REDUCING MIGRATION OF MINERAL OIL HYDROCARBONS (MOH)
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697748
WOOD TREATMENT COMPOSITIONS HAVING ANTIMICROBIAL PROPERTIES
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692363
Protective Material and Associated Protective Wear
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
62%
With Interview (+4.7%)
3y 7m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 699 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month