Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/947,748

SECURE CONFIGURATION OF A VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK SERVER

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Examiner
SONG, HOSUK
Art Unit
2435
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
UAB 360 IT
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
1440 granted / 1520 resolved
+36.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1544
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§103
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§102
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1520 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1-20 are pending in this application. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement(s) submitted by applicant on 1/16/2025 have been considered. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Form PTO-1449 signed and attached hereto. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,170,650. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other (see table below). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 12,170,650 Claim 1: A method, comprising: storing, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system in a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; storing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system in the memory associated with the VPN server; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system. Claim 1: A method, comprising: obtaining, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system from a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system on a volatile memory associated with the VPN server. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both applications are directed to a method for transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; and only differing in that the claims of the '650 patent explicitly recite executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system on a volatile memory associated with the VPN server. Thus, the claims of the ‘650 patent are rendered as obvious variants of the instant claims. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11601401. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other (see table below). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 11,601,401 Claim 1: A method, comprising: storing, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system in a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; storing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system in the memory associated with the VPN server; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system. Claim 1: A method, comprising: installing, by a virtual private network(VPN) server on a volatile memory, an initial operating system to enable the VPN server to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; transmitting, by the VPN server based at least in part on installing the initial operating system, a request to an infrastructure device for the VPN operating system; receiving, by the VPN server at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system from the infrastructure device; and installing, by the VPN server on the volatile memory, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both applications are directed to a method of installing or storing VPN operating system on the memory; and only differing in that the claims of the '401 patent explicitly recite transmitting, by the VPN server based at least in part on installing the initial operating system, a request to an infrastructure device for the VPN operating system and installing, by the VPN server on the volatile memory, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services. Thus, the claims of the ‘401 patent are rendered as obvious variants of the instant claims. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11582197. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other (see table below). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 11,582,197 Claim 1: A method, comprising: storing, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system in a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; storing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system in the memory associated with the VPN server; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system. Claim 1: A method, comprising: retrieving, by a processor associated with a virtual private network(VPN) server, an initial operating system stored in a non-volatile memory, the initial operating system being associated with the VPN server providing VPN services; storing, by the processor, the initial operating system in a volatile memory; executing, by the processor, the initial operating system from the volatile memory to obtain a VPN operating system; storing, by the processor, the VPN operating system in the volatile memory; and executing, by the processor, the VPN operating system from the volatile memory to provide the VPN services, wherein the VPN operating system common to VPN servers and a custom parameter file including custom parameters to configure the primary VPN operating system. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both are directed to a method of installing or executing VPN operating system on the memory; and only differing in that the claims of the '197 patent explicitly recite the VPN operating system common to VPN servers and a custom parameter file including custom parameters to configure the primary VPN operating system. Thus, the claims of the ‘197 patent are rendered as obvious variants of the instant claims. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11,777,905. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other (see table below). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 11,777,905 Claim 1: A method, comprising: storing, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system in a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; storing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system in the memory associated with the VPN server; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system. Claim 1: A method, comprising: transmitting, by a virtual private network (VPN) server while executing an initial operating system stored on a volatile memory, a request for a VPN operating system; receiving, by the VPN server, a primary VPN operating system based at least in part on transmitting the request for the VPN operating system; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the primary VPN operating system stored on the volatile memory, a request for a custom parameter file to configure the primary VPN operating system; and utilizing, by the VPN server based at least in part on receiving the custom parameter file, custom parameters included in the custom parameter file to configure the primary VPN operating system. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both are directed to a method of transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system; and only differing in that the claims of the '905 patent explicitly recite a request for a custom parameter file to configure the primary VPN operating system; and utilizing, by the VPN server based at least in part on receiving the custom parameter file, custom parameters. Thus, the claims of the ‘905 patent are rendered as obvious variants of the instant claims. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,101,299. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other (see table below). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 12,101,299 Claim 1: A method, comprising: storing, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system in a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; storing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system in the memory associated with the VPN server; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system. Claim 1: A method, comprising: retrieving, by a device associated with a virtual private network(VPN) server from a read-only device, an initial operating system associated with the VPN server providing VPN services; transmitting, by the device based at least in part on executing the initial operating system, a first request to an infrastructure device for a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide the VPN services; receiving, by the device from the infrastructure device based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; and executing, by the device, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both are directed to a method of an initial operating system associated with the VPN server providing VPN services; transmitting in part on executing the initial operating system; and only differing in that the claims of the '299 patent explicitly recite a first request to an infrastructure device for a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide the VPN services; receiving, by the device from the infrastructure device based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; and executing, by the device, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services. Thus, the claims of the ‘299 patent are rendered as obvious variants of the instant claims. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11,962,570. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other (see table below). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 11,962,570 Claim 1: A method, comprising: storing, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system in a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; storing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system in the memory associated with the VPN server; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system. Claim 1: A method, comprising: configuring, by an infrastructure device, a virtual private network (VPN) server to install an initial operating system on a volatile memory associated with the VPN server; configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to execute the initial operating system from the volatile memory to receive a VPN operating system; configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to install the VPN operating system on the volatile memory; and configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to execute the VPN operating system from the volatile memory to provide VPN services. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both are directed to a method of storing or configuring by VPN to install or execute initial operating system in a memory; and only differing in that the claims of the '570 patent explicitly recite configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to install the VPN operating system on the volatile memory; and configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to execute the VPN operating system from the volatile memory to provide VPN services. Thus, the claims of the ‘570 patent are rendered as obvious variants of the instant claims. Claims 1-20 rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-21 of U.S. Patent No. 11,991,151. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other (see table below). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 11,991,151 Claim 1: A method, comprising: storing, by a virtual private network (VPN) server, an initial operating system in a memory associated with the VPN server; transmitting, by the VPN server while executing the initial operating system, a request to obtain a VPN operating system to enable the VPN server to provide VPN services; receiving, by the VPN server based at least in part on transmitting the request, the VPN operating system; storing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system in the memory associated with the VPN server; and executing, by the VPN server, the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services based at least in part on storing the VPN operating system. Claim 1: A method, comprising: configuring, by an infrastructure device, a virtual private network(VPN) server to receive, while executing an initial operating system that is stored on a volatile memory, a primary VPN operating system; configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to receive, while executing the primary VPN operating system, custom parameters associated with the VPN server providing VPN services; configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to determine a VPN operating system based at least in part on configuring the primary VPN operating system with the custom parameters; and configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to execute the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services. Although the conflicting claims are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because both are directed to a method of storing or configuring by VPN to install or execute initial operating system in a memory; and only differing in that the claims of the '151 patent explicitly recite the VPN server to determine a VPN operating system based at least in part on configuring the primary VPN operating system with the custom parameters; and configuring, by the infrastructure device, the VPN server to execute the VPN operating system to provide the VPN services. Thus, the claims of the ‘151 patent are rendered as obvious variants of the instant claims. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 would be allowable if a Terminal Disclaimer is submitted to overcome the Double Patenting rejection, set forth in this office action. USPTO Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOSUK SONG whose telephone number is (571)272-3857. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 7:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Mehrmanesh can be reached at 571-273-8300. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOSUK SONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2435
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602460
INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598089
BLOCKCHAIN ZIPPER ENCRYPTED PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598158
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURING NETWORK TRAFFIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596812
ATTACK ROUTE EXTRACTION SYSTEM, ATTACK ROUTE EXTRACTION METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593212
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FRAUD DETECTION THROUGH NETWORK MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+2.7%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1520 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month