Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/947,917

SHORT CIRCUIT CABLE SUPPORT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Sep 15, 2021 — divisional of 12/149,061
Examiner
MILLNER, MONICA E
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Schneider Electric SE
OA Round
2 (Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
897 granted / 1157 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1186
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.6%
-13.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1157 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Claims 1-9 and 12-21 are amended. Claims 10-11 are cancelled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 13-18 and 21-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 5,115,542 to Gehres. Regarding claim 13, Gehres ‘542 discloses a support for a plurality of cables, comprising: a cable separator beam 30; first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 on respective opposite ends of the cable separator beam 30; and a half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 (bottom portion) that is configured to align with one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28, wherein the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 and the half- cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 form a space 60 for one or more of the plurality of cables, the space extending perpendicular to the cable separator beam 30, and wherein the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 is configured to mount to the one or more of the plurality of cables such that a gap exists between the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 and the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 when the one or more of the plurality of cables are secured in the space 60. Regarding claim 14, Gehres ‘542 discloses, further comprising: a fastening portion 24 on the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 and a fastening structure 22 on one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30, configured to fasten the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 to the one of the first and second half-cylindrically- shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30. Regarding claim 15, Gehres ‘542 discloses, further comprising: a hook portion 66 on the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 and a latch structure 24 on one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves of the cable separator beam, configured to fasten the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap to the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves of the cable separator beam. Regarding claim 16, Gehres ‘542 discloses, further comprising: a first fastening structure 22 on the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28, a second fastening structure 24 on the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30, and a fastener 66 joining the first and second fastening structures 22/24, configured to fasten the half- cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 to the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 3- such that the gap exists between a mating surface of the half-cylindrically- shaped end-cap 28 and a mating surface of the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30. Regarding claim 17, Gehres ‘542 discloses further comprising: a first latch structure 22 on the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28, a second latch structure 24 on the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30, and a fastener 66 joining the first and second latch structures 22/24, configured to fasten the half-cylindrically- shaped end-cap 28 to the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30. Regarding claim 18, Gehres ‘542 discloses, further comprising: a first fastening structure 24 on the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 and a second fastening structure 22 on the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30, configured to fasten together, to fasten the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap 28 to the one of the first and second half-cylindrically-shaped sleeves 28 of the cable separator beam 30. Regarding claim 21, Gehres ‘542 discloses, wherein the cable separator beam and the half-cylindrically-shaped end-cap are electrically insulating (col. 1, line 36). Regarding claim 22, Gehres ‘542 discloses a support for a plurality of cables, the support comprising: a cable separator beam 30; first and second curved sleeves 28 on respective opposite ends of the cable separator beam 30; and a curved end-cap 28 that is configured to align with one of the first and second curved sleeves, wherein the one of the first and second curved sleeves 28 and the curved end-cap form a space for one or more of the plurality of cables, and wherein the one of the first and second curved sleeves 28 is configured to be fastened to the curved end-cap 28 and tightened by a screw fastener, a pin, or a latch 22. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-9 and 12 are allowed. Claims 19-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: (claim 1) note the configuration of the sleeve sides relative to the beam and the gap that exists between the sleeves and end cap when the cables are secured in place. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MONICA E MILLNER whose telephone number is (571)270-7507. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MONICA E MILLNER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 07, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 01, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12731971
SEGMENTED CABLE TANGENT CLAMP
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727670
SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729808
RAIL CLAMP FOR SOLAR PANEL MODULE
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729809
DECK CLIP AND METHOD OF ATTACHING ACCESSORIES TO STAGE SYSTEMS
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721439
ANGLE ADJUSTING STRUCTURE FOR DISPLAY
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.2%)
1y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1157 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month