Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/947,981

PRE-COMPENSATION OF PDU SET SIZE VALUE FOR TRANSPORTING MEDIA DATA VIA A NETWORK

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Nov 16, 2023 — provisional 63/599,930 +1 more
Examiner
ABELSON, RONALD B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
1209 granted / 1338 resolved
+30.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -0% lift
Without
With
+-0.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1382
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
59.6%
+19.6% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.3%
-32.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1338 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . D1 THORSTEN LOHMAR ET AL: "[5G_RTP] Number of PDUs in PDU Set within RTP header extension", 3GPP DRAFT; S4-231758; TYPE PCR; 5G_RTP, 3RD GENERATION PARTNERSHIP PROJECT (3GPP), MOBILE COMPETENCE CENTRE ; 650, ROUTE DES LUCIOLES ; F-06921 SOPHIA-ANTIPOLIS CEDEX ; FRANCE, vol. SA WG4, no. Chicago, US; 20231113 - 20231117 7 November 2023 (2023-11-07), XP052546041, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_SA/WG4_CODEC/ TSGS4_126_Chicago/Docs/S4-231758.zip S4-231758_XRM_PDU_Set_Size-PDUs.docx [retrieved on 2023-11-07] Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 7, 17, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1. Regarding claim 1, 17, and 20, D1 teaches a method of exchanging media data(see § 4.4.2.1) the method comprising: calculating a cumulative size of packets of a protocol data unit PDU, Set received from a source device (see page 2 PDU set size indicates total size of all PDUs); determining a signaled size for the PDU Set (see page 2 lines 20-24, PSSize); calculating a ratio between the cumulative size and the signaled size; and sending data representative of the ratio to the source device (see page 2 lines 44-46, the difference between the IPv6 and IPv4 header size). Regarding claim 7, the data representative of the ratio comprises data explicitly indicating the ratio (see page 2 lines 44-46, the difference between the IPv6 and IPv4 header size). (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 7, 17, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Teyeb US 20250106656. Regarding claim 1, 17, and 20, Teyeb teaches a method of exchanging media data the method comprising: calculating a cumulative size of packets of a protocol data unit PDU, Set received from a source device (delta/full information (e.g., any of the total size information for the PDU set, [0331]); determining a signaled size for the PDU Set (actual size of PDU set, [0333]); calculating a ratio between the cumulative size and the signaled size; and sending data representative of the ratio to the source device ( In an embodiment, in a case where the WTRU has indicated a different size (e.g., lower or higher) than the actual size of the PDU set in the first BSR the WTRU may have sent, the WTRU may include information in the second BSR indicating the difference, [0333]). Regarding claim 7, the data representative of the ratio comprises data explicitly indicating the ratio (difference, [0333]) Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6, 8-16, 18, and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONALD B ABELSON whose telephone number is (571)272-3165. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RONALD B ABELSON/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772114
METHOD FOR COMMUNICATION CONTROL, COMMUNICATION DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771623
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A DATA FLOW PATH IN AN OVERLAY NETWORK
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771421
REPORTING METHOD, EQUIPMENT, AND MEDIUM
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12764752
MONITORING METHOD AND DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12750200
DEMODULATION REFERENCE SIGNAL PRECODING IN PRECODING RESOURCE BLOCK GROUPS ASSOCIATED WITH SUBBAND FULL DUPLEX CONFIGURATIONS
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (-0.2%)
2y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1338 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month