Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/947,997

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED INTERACTION WITH A TOUCH-SCREEN DEVICE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Nov 15, 2022 — continuation of 11/698,700 +1 more
Examiner
LANEAU, RONALD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Jackpocket LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1328 granted / 1505 resolved
+28.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
1522
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§103
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.7%
-31.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1505 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Preliminary Amendment Claims 1-20 were canceled in a preliminary amendment received on 05/29/25. Claims 21-40 were added and are now pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Regarding claim 21, the word "autonomous" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear what Applicant is trying to convey. Is it fully autonomous or semi-autonomous and relative to what it is autonomous. Furthermore, regarding claims 21, 32 and 37 Applicant recites the limitations “tactilely detectable,” this renders the claim indefinite as it is unclear how this detection is done. Applicant is required to clarify this language or point out where in the specification such language is defined. As a result, claims 21-40 are rejected. Claim 21 further recites the limitation "the at least one solenoid" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim as there is no prior introduction of “at least one solenoid” in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 21-40 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. None of the references, either singularly or in combination, discloses or even suggests: As per claims 21-31, an autonomous touch-screen interaction device, comprising: a solenoid including an end effector that is tactilely detectable by the touch- screen, the at least one solenoid being operable to cause the end effector to extend for tactilely engaging with a touch-screen of a touch-screen device; and a housing, wherein the optical sensor and the solenoid are mounted in the housing. As per claims 32-36, an optical sensor, comprising: a photo-sensor mounted in the housing and configured to sense light via the first aperture; and a solenoid mounting in the housing and operable to extend an end effector out from the second aperture, the end effector tactilely detectable by a touch-screen of a touch-screen device. As per claims 37-40, a system for automated interaction with a touch-screen device, comprising: a solenoid mounting in the housing and operable to extend an end effector out from the second aperture, the end effector tactilely detectable by a touch- screen of a touch-screen device; and a frame configured to mount the housing relative to the touch-screen device. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See references cited on PTO form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RONALD LANEAU whose telephone number is (571)272-6784. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thu 6-4:30 ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Vasat can be reached at 571-272-7625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. PNG media_image1.png 275 275 media_image1.png Greyscale /Ronald Laneau/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676051
LIVE ACTION CRAPS TABLE WITH OPTICAL HAND AND DICE TRACKING
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673268
EXTENDABLE PARTIES IN VIDEO GAMES
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673259
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENABLING AN AVATAR FROM AN APPLICATION TO VISIT ANOTHER APPLICATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673269
INVITING OTHER PLAYERS TO ENGAGE IN VIRTUAL INTERACTIONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673270
METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION IN GAME, APPARATUS, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+9.7%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1505 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month