Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/948,011

WIRE HARNESS DESIGNING METHOD, WIRE HARNESS MANUFACTURING METHOD, AND VEHICLE WIRE HARNESS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Nov 16, 2022 — JP 2022-183630 +1 more
Examiner
ROBINSON, KRYSTAL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Yazaki Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
672 granted / 778 resolved
+26.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
798
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
31.9%
-8.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 778 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. This application is a Continuation of PCT/JP2023/040658 filed November 10, 2023. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on November 11, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: 38 and 39. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: the term “while” should be removed. The term “while” implies an ongoing concurrent action without clearly defining if the classification is a functional step or an inherent state. The applicant should amend this to a direct step (e.g., "classifying components...") to improve readability. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1: “integrating the first sub-harness, the second sub-harness, and the third sub-harness” is indefinite because the physical “integrating” step is structurally inconsistent with a “designing” method. It is unclear whether the step requires physical joining of wires, or if it means “integrating the designs of” the sub harnesses on a schematic. The examiner will interpret the claim to be “integrating the first sub-harness, the second sub-harness, and the third sub-harness via a junction box.” Claim 2: There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. -Recites "the components of the vehicle wire harness". Claim 1, to which claim 2 depends, recites "components provided in an entire circuit of a vehicle wire harness." The introduction of "the components..." in claim 2 without linking them clearly back to the entire circuit leaves it unclear whether it refers to all components or a specific sub-selection. - Recites "a specific function on a vehicle" and "a specific region on a vehicle body." The use of the definite article "a" mixed with the descriptor "specific" is indefinite without defining what functional category or spatial boundary qualifies as "specific." Claim 3: There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The terms “the component” in lines 5-7 should be “a component. Claim 4: The claim is indefinite because of the terms “connects common portions of the circuits of the first sub-harness, the second sub-harness, and the third sub-harness” is vague. The claim is clear that the first, second and third sub-harnesses are distinct without overlapping domains. It is unclear to the examiner what the “common portion” is between the mutually exclusive circuits. The examiner will interpret the claim to read: 4. A vehicle wire harness comprising: a first sub-harness that constitutes an upstream circuit common to a plurality of vehicle types among components provided in an entire circuit of the vehicle wire harness; a second sub-harness that constitutes an independent domain circuit belonging to a specific function on a vehicle among the components provided in the entire circuit of the vehicle wire harness; a third sub-harness that constitutes a zone circuit belonging to a specific region on a vehicle body other than the specific function among the components provided in the entire circuit of the vehicle wire harness; and a common circuit connection unit that electrically connects portions of the circuits of the first sub-harness, the second sub-harness, and the third sub-harness via a junction box. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Matsumura (WO 2019/160147). In regards to claim 1, Matsumura teaches a wire harness (figure 11) designing method comprising: classifying components provided in an entire circuit of a vehicle wire harness into three layers, that is, an upstream circuit (The device-side wire harness 5WHb2 is a wiring member that connects the power communication relay device 512 and the device. Here, an area ECU 520 and a control target device 590 to be controlled by the area ECU 520 are employed as devices, page 15, paragraph [0006]), an independent domain circuit (first functional layer (40)), and a zone circuit (The second function is a wiring system for an automobile including a function related to at least one of a carry-in device connection function and an entertainment function, claim 2), according to differences in category, determining a configuration of a first sub-harness (5WHb2) belonging to the upstream circuit; determining a configuration of a second sub-harness (Wha) belonging to the independent domain circuit; determining a configuration of a third sub-harness (WHb5) belonging to the zone circuit; and integrating the first sub-harness (5WHb2), the second sub-harness (Wha), and the third sub-harness (WHb5) via a junction box (14d). In regards to claim 4, Matsumura teaches a vehicle wire harness (see figure 11) comprising: a first sub-harness (5WHb2) that constitutes an upstream circuit common to a plurality of vehicle types among components provided in an entire circuit of the vehicle wire harness (The device-side wire harness 5WHb2 is a wiring member that connects the power communication relay device 512 and the device. Here, an area ECU 520 and a control target device 590 to be controlled by the area ECU 520 are employed as devices, page 15, paragraph [0006]); a second sub-harness (Wha) that constitutes an independent domain circuit belonging to a specific function (first functional layer (40)) on a vehicle among the components provided in the entire circuit of the vehicle wire harness (The first function includes a function related to driving of an automobile, claim 2); a third sub-harness (WHb5) that constitutes a zone circuit belonging to a specific region on a vehicle body other than the specific function (The second function is a wiring system for an automobile including a function related to at least one of a carry-in device connection function and an entertainment function, claim 2) among the components provided in the entire circuit of the vehicle wire harness (second functional layer 60); and a common circuit connection unit (junction box 14d) that electrically connects portions of the circuits of the first sub-harness, the second sub-harness, and the third sub-harness via a junction box (14d). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Mizuno (US 11,787,353) teaches a wire harness for a vehicle; Kisu (US 2020/0130613) teaches a harness with different branches and connectors; Kisu (US 2020/009168) teaches a wire harness with a terminal connector and sub harnesses. Communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KRYSTAL ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)272-9258. The examiner can normally be reached on 9-5 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Timothy Dole can be reached on (571)-272-2229. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KRYSTAL ROBINSON/Examiner, Art Unit 2848
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702024
CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697485
ELECTROSTIMULATION DEVICE WITH A DOUBLE PERCUTANEOUS COAXIAL NEEDLE AND PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691835
WIRE HARNESS ASSEMBLIES
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12691838
ELECTRICAL CONNECTION STRUCTURE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688948
DIELECTRIC BODY FOR AN ELECTRICAL COMPONENT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (-5.3%)
1y 11m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 778 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month