Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/948,651

ENHANCED RADIAL DAMAGING PROJECTILE AND METHOD OF USE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 15, 2024
Examiner
WEBER, JONATHAN C
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
570 granted / 889 resolved
+12.1% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
919
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.9%
-7.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 889 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 1-19 and 21 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected inventions and/or species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 10 February 2026. Based on the applicant’s election of Species of Embodiment P, encompassing Figures 10L and 10J as successfully argued by the applicant in the response filed 10 February 2026, claims 20 and 22-40 are pending in the application. After reviewing the elected species and claims, the examiner notes that claims 30-32 and 37-39 are directed to non-elected species, such as Figures 10A-10F, and these claims are hereby withdrawn by the examiner. Therefore, claims 20, 22-29, 33-36 and 40 are currently pending review in the application. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement(s) (IDS) submitted on 11 March 2025 is/are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement(s) is/are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim(s) 20, 22-29, 33-36, and 40 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being clearly anticipated by U.S. Pre-Grant Publication 2016/0153757 by Mahnke (Mahnke). Regarding claim 20, Mahnke discloses a projectile (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C), comprising: a body having a longitudinal axis, a front end and a rear end at respective ends along the longitudinal axis, and a surface profile extending from the front end to the rear end, wherein the surface profile is radially symmetrical about the longitudinal axis, the body having a caliber size defining a largest diameter of the body along the longitudinal axis; two or more radially-recessed regions (8) forming stress-concentrating edges arranged proximate the front end of the body (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 22, Mahnke further discloses wherein the stress-concentrating edges are symmetrically spaced about the longitudinal axis (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 23, Mahnke further discloses wherein the stress-concentrating edges extend along the surface profile of the body such that the stress-concentrating edges each have a fore end and an aft end (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 24, Mahnke further discloses wherein the fore end of each stress-concentrating edge is arranged at the front end of the body (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 25, Mahnke further discloses wherein the aft end of each stress-concentrating edge is arranged along the surface profile spaced from the front end at a position such that each stress-concentrating edge is entirely radially within the largest diameter of the body (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 26, Mahnke further discloses wherein the stress-concentrating edges are oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the body (See at least Figures 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated). Regarding claim 27, Mahnke further discloses wherein the stress-concentrating edges are canted at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the body (See at least Figures 11A-11F, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C). Regarding claim 28, Mahnke further discloses wherein the fore end of each stress-concentrating edge is arranged a spaced distance from the front end of the body (See at least Figures 11A-11F, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C). Regarding claim 29, Mahnke further discloses wherein the fore end of each stress-concentrating edge tapers to a point (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 33, Mahnke further discloses wherein the stress-concentrating edges are configured to concentrate stress under impact to initiate controlled fracture to maximize crack length inside the target (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 34, Mahnke further discloses wherein each recessed region is a planar surface (See at least Figures 40A-40C, clearly illustrated). Regarding claim 35, Mahnke further discloses wherein each planar surface normal vector has an angle with the longitudinal axis of the body between 10 and 85 degrees (See at least Figures 40A-40C, clearly illustrated). Regarding claim 36, Mahnke further discloses wherein each stress-concentrating edge is formed as a linear edge by adjacent planar regions in contact with each other (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Regarding claim 40, Mahnke discloses a projectile, comprising: a body having a longitudinal axis, a front end and a rear end at respective ends along the longitudinal axis, and a surface profile extending from the front end to the rear end, wherein the surface profile is radially symmetrical about the longitudinal axis, the body having a caliber size defining a largest diameter of the body along the longitudinal axis; two or more stress concentrating features arranged proximate the front end of the body, the stress concentrating features formed by recessed regions adjacent to each stress-concentrating feature (See at least Figures 11A-11F and 39A-40C, all aspects clearly illustrated, especially figures 11A-11C and 39A-40C). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892 Form for a listing of applicable prior art references. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JONATHAN C WEBER whose telephone number is (571)270-5377. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Jonathan C Weber/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641 JONATHAN C. WEBER Primary Examiner Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601557
QUICK COUPLING MUZZLE BOOSTER AND SURPRESSOR ADAPTOR SYSTEM FOR LOCKED BREECH PISTOLS AND PISTOL CALIBER CARBINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601576
Sinter Bonded Projectile
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590774
TRIGGER RESTRICTION DEVICE FOR CONDUCTED ENERGY DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590776
DISCREET BLANK FIRING ADAPTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578174
A CURVE OF CONSTANT WIDTH PROJECTILE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+29.0%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 889 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month