Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/948,904

LOAD BALANCING NETWORK FOR DYNAMICALLY ADAPTING AND COMMUNICATING DATA

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Nov 15, 2024
Priority
Apr 10, 2024 — continuation of 12/149,524
Examiner
TRAN, TRI MINH
Art Unit
2432
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Wingstop Restaurants Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
459 granted / 560 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
8 currently pending
Career history
568
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
83.1%
+43.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 560 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-20 are pending. This is in response to the application filed on November 15, 2024, which is a Continuation of the parent application 18/631,768 filed on April 10, 2024, as Patent 12149524. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1, 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1, 19 and 20 respectively of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,149524. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Prior art made of record and not relied upon Pub 20220245661: Food ordering system with customer mobile device application responds to the restaurant beacon ping with identifying info if the beacon is properly credentialed where data on the customer application is proximity-based (Figs. 20-22 and related text). Inquiry communication Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRI M TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1994. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri: 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Nickerson can be reached at (469)295-9235. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRI M TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2432
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12639438
JUST IN TIME MEMORY ANALYSIS FOR MALWARE DETECTION
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639470
SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR DATA ENCRYPTION AND APPLICATION-AGNOSTIC QUERYING OF ENCRYPTED DATA
1y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12632553
METHOD AND A SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING COMPROMISED DEVICES IN AN APPLICATION INFRASTRUCTURE
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627657
COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR WEARABLE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12625960
METHODS FOR FILTERING AND FOR QUALIFYING SECURITY EVENTS OF AN INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.0%)
2y 6m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 560 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month