Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/949,065

METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS FOR CLOSED-LOOP NEUROMODULATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 15, 2024
Priority
Nov 08, 2019 — provisional 62/932,906 +6 more
Examiner
BERTRAM, ERIC D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
The University of Melbourne
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1051 granted / 1294 resolved
+21.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
1330
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1294 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species B, 3, I, c and ii in the reply filed on 7/31/2026 is acknowledged. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 11/15/2024 and 3/25/2026 were filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: in the first paragraph, the continuity data should be updated to indicate that US App. No. 18/309,073 is now US Patent No. 12,168,135. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 21, 24-34 and 37-46 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Opie et al. (US 2018/0303595, hereinafter Opie). Regarding claims 21, 24, 30, 34, 37 and 43, Opie discloses a system and method for measuring an electrophysiological signal in a subject (see abstract and par. 0017). A catheter 102 is deployed through a bodily vessel of the subject (fig. 25 and par. 0196). An electrode array comprising a plurality of electrodes 113 is advanced through the delivery catheter to a position in proximity to a motor cortex of the subject (fig. 25 and par. 0091). The electrode array is anchored using a radially self-expanding anchor 101 against a wall of the vessel without obstructing the vessel, such that the anchor is proximal to the electrodes (fig. 26 and 0196-0198). ECoG signals are recorded with a processor 191 in controller unit 12 implanted in a patient (fig. 1 and par. 0090, 0155, 0180). Regarding claims 25, 26, 38 and 39, the anchor 101 can be a coil that, when fully expanded, is larger than the vessel, such that friction force applied by the coil against the vessel wall anchors the coil (par. 0010 and 0191). Regarding claims 27, 28, 40 and 41, multiple electrode arrays on separate endovascular carriers can be implanted indifferent locations (fig. 29-30). Regarding claims 29, 31-32, 42 and 44-45, the system is closed loop, such that when recorded signals (i.e., recorded mode) meet a threshold to indicate epilepsy, the output stimulation signals (i.e., stimulation mode) are adjusted to suppress the epilepsy (par. 0299-0300). Regarding claims 33 and 46, the implanted device receives power (i.e., is charged) using wireless inductive charging using an antenna (par. 0096, 0180). Claims 21-24, 30 and 34-37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lamson et al. (US 2004/0015193, hereinafter Lamson). Regarding claims 21-24, 30 and 34-37, Lamson discloses a system and method for measuring an electrophysiological signal in a brain of a subject (see par. 0031). A catheter 10c is deployed through a bodily vessel of the subject (fig. 8 and par. 0038, 0045). An electrode array comprising a plurality of electrodes 20c is advanced through the delivery catheter to a position in proximity to a motor cortex of the subject (fig. 8 and par. 0045). The electrode array is anchored using a radially self-expanding anchor shown in figure 7h against a wall of the vessel without obstructing the vessel, such that the anchor is proximal to the electrodes since it is attached to puncturing device 14 that is used to puncture and extend through the vessel wall (fig. 8 and par. 0044). ECoG signals are recorded with a processor 191 in controller unit 12 implanted in a patient (par. 0005). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attached PTO-892, especially US 2018/0236221, which discloses a method of measuring an ECoG signal from an array with a self-expanding anchor. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Eric D Bertram whose telephone number is (571)272-3446. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-6pm Central Time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer McDonald can be reached at 571-270-3061. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Eric D. Bertram/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 09, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Sep 30, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734366
RELAY-BASED DE-ENERGIZABLE DEFIBRILLATION ASSEMBLY
1y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728261
ASSEMBLIES, ELECTRODE LEADS, AND METHODS FOR STEERING AN ELECTRODE LEAD DURING INSERTION INTO A COCHLEA
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728280
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING SHORT-TERM VISUAL STIMULATION PLATFORM FOR BRAIN FUNCTION CONTROL
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722016
CONFORMAL ANTENNA FOR AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12708785
Electrode Containment Structures In A Wearable Medical Device
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.4%)
3y 2m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1294 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month