Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
DETAILED ACTION
Priority
This application claims benefit for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) to EPO
PNG
media_image1.png
18
166
media_image1.png
Greyscale
, is acknowledged.
Status of Claims
Claims 1-30 and 33 are currently pending in the application. Claims 31-32 were canceled.
Information Disclosure Statement
Receipt is acknowledged of Information Disclosure Statement (IDS), filed on 01/16/2025, which has been entered in the file.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b):
(b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention.
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph:
The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention.
Claim 33 (currently amended) is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 (b) or 35 U.S.C. § 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the Applicant regards as the invention. The expressions “such as” [claim 33 (currently amended), line 3, page 30 and all other occurrences, if any] and “in particular” [claim 33 (currently amended), line 4, page 30 and all other occurrences, if any], render the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation following the phrase is part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05 (d) and therefore, it is not possible to ascertain the metes and bounds of the claimed subject matter. The use of expressions “such as” and “in particular” in the middle of the claim also may lead to confusion over the intended scope of the claim. It is suggested that the expressions “such as” and “in particular” be deleted or amend the claim within the context and scope of the claim in order to overcome the rejection.
Telephone Inquiry
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Golam Shameem, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571) 272-0706. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from 7:30 AM - 6:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Clinton Brooks, Ph.D. can be reached at (571) 270-7682.
Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal. Should you have questions about access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free).
Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application should be directed to the Group receptionist, whose telephone number is (571) 272-1600.
/GOLAM M SHAMEEM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1621
Prosecution Insights