Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/950,709

TOUCH SENSING DISPLAY APPARATUS AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 18, 2024
Priority
Jan 09, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0003376
Examiner
BUTCHER, BRIAN M
Art Unit
2627
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
650 granted / 839 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
862
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 839 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 15 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 15 recites the limitations "the first touch sensing frame" at Line 10 and “the second touch sensing frame” at Line 11 where there is insufficient antecedent basis for these limitations in the claim because no - - first touch sensing frame - - or - - second sensing frame - - have been introduced in Claim 15. Notice that Claims 16 – 20 fall rejected with Claim 15 due to dependency. Also, the Examiner recommends adding the subject matter dropped from Claim 1 in the chain of dependency of Claim 2 (i.e. - - a position at which the touch carry clock is generated during a first touch sensing frame included in the touch sensing driving period differs from a position at which the touch carry clock is generated during a second touch sensing frame included in the touch sensing driving period, - -) back into Claim 15 to overcome the instant rejections. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 14 are allowable over the prior art of record for reasoning reflected in the history of the prosecution of the instant application. Response to Applicants Amendments and Arguments Applicants amendments and arguments filed October 29, 2025 have been fully considered. First, the Examiner agrees that the amendments to Claims 1 and 9 overcome the 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) rejections of Claims 1, 6, 9, and 13 and the 35 U.S.C. 103 rejections of Claims 8 and 14 as set forth and made of record in the Office Action mailed July 29, 2025. Second, grounds for rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) have been presented with respect to newly submitted Claims 15 – 20 as described far above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN M BUTCHER whose telephone number is (571)270-5575. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday from 6:30 AM to 3:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Ke Xiao, can be reached at (571) 272 - 7776. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /BRIAN M BUTCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2627 February 06, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 29, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 11, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12622152
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12608100
TOUCH DISPLAY PANEL AND TOUCH CONTROL DISPLAY APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12604639
Display Device
3y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596440
GESTURE-CONTROLLED VIRTUAL REALITY SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF CONTROLLING THE SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592179
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+14.3%)
2y 1m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 839 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month