Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/951,746

KNEECAP HARVESTER AND METHOD FOR REMOVING A KNEECAP

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 19, 2024
Priority
Nov 20, 2023 — NL 2036312
Examiner
PRICE JR, RICHARD THOMAS
Art Unit
3643
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Meyn Food Processing Technology B V
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
939 granted / 1073 resolved
+35.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1084
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1073 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by van den Nieuwelaar et al (US Patent 5,173,077). Regarding claim 19, van den Nieuwelaar et al teach a movable chisel 256 with a forward end (unnumbered) and arranged to engage the thighbone and to move between the thighbone and the kneecap so as to detach at least part of the naturally present connections between the thighbone and the kneecap. See figure 23c and column 12, lines 14-23. At least one clamp 196 is provided and fixes the thighbone via the naturally present connections from the drum bone to the thighbone. Regarding claim 20, the chisel 256 moves the kneecap away from the thighbone, see figure 23c. As for claim 22, a support plate 216 restricts the motion of the thighbone while the chisel engages the thighbone. See figures 23a-23c. As for claim 23, a gripper 202 secures the drum bone as shown in figures 23a-23c. Regarding claim 24, at least one blade 212 engages the meat in the vicinity of the kneecap also shown in figures 23a-23c. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: In regards to claim 13, the prior art of record does not teach clamping the thighbone in a fixed position, engaging the thighbone with a forward end of a chisel and then moving the chisel between the thighbone and the kneecap and detaching at least part of naturally present connections between the thighbone and the kneecap. The prior art is broadly directed towards the drum bone being clamped. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-18 are allowed. Claim 21 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICHARD T. PRICE JR whose telephone number is (571)272-6892. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7AM-3:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter M. Poon can be reached at 571-272-6891. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICHARD T PRICE JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Nov 19, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677840
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SEPARATING MEAT FROM BONE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667111
Closing Machine For Closing Sausage Products
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660829
SWEEP EDGE BLADES FOR LOIN PULLER MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660830
TRUSSING SYSTEM AND METHOD
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12642276
Systems And Methods For Rotating Products During Processing
9m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+5.6%)
1y 11m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1073 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month