Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/951,962

GPR88-RECEPTOR-AGONIST

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 19, 2024
Priority
Nov 20, 2023 — provisional 63/600,842
Examiner
WHITE, DAWANNA SHAR-DAY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
75 granted / 120 resolved
+2.5% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
161
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 120 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation “The compound” in line 1; however, since claim 1 is the independent claim and since this is the 1st mention of “the compound” the claim does not have antecedent basis. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Moreover, claims 2 – 5 are included in the rejection since the claims dependent from claim 1 but do not address the deficiency. Discussion of the Prior art The closet prior art of Ye et. al. ((2019), Orphan Receptor GPR88 as an Emerging Neurotherapeutic Target, ACS Chem Neurosci, 10, 190 – 200) teach that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), also known as seven-transmembrane domain receptors, are the largest group of signaling proteins in the human genome, with at least 800 members. See page 190 column 1 paragraph 1. Moreover, Ye et. al. teach GPCRs mediate a myriad of important physiological and pathological processes ranging from blood pressure regulation, allergic response, renal function, hormonal disorders, psychiatric disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases to the progression of human cancers. See page 190 column 1 paragraph 1. Furthermore, Ye et. al. teach that the large number of druggable GPCRs includes GPR88, a class A rhodopsin family orphan receptor, that is curiously expressed almost exclusively in the striatum of the brain in rodents, primates, and humans. See page 190 column 2 paragraph 2. Additionally, Ye et.al. teach that GPR88 plays an important role in the regulation of various brain and behavioral functions, including cognition, mood, movement control, and cue-based reward learning, and is emerging as a promising drug target for the treatment of basal ganglia associated disorders. See page 190 column 2 paragraph 2 and page 191 column 1 paragraph 1. Moreover, Ye et.al. teach that several studies relevant to Parkinsons’s disease (PD) and Huntington’s disease (HD) have suggested changes in GPR88 expression, and notably Gpr88 KO mice have altered motor functions. See page 192 column 1 paragraph 4. See claim 4 limitations for a method of treating a psychiatric or neurological condition associated with impulse control deficits, addiction, speech delay, learning disabilities, depression, psychosis, bipolar disorder and/or emotional valence in a patient. See claim 5 limitations for a method where the selected psychiatric or neurological condition is Huntington’s disease and/or Parkinsons’s disease. In particular, Ye et. al. teach compound 3 of structure PNG media_image1.png 386 658 media_image1.png Greyscale with an EC50 value of 3.5 nM in a cAMP HTRF assay. See page 193 Figure 3 and page 194 column 2 Table 1. However, Ye et. al. fails to teach a compound of structure PNG media_image2.png 390 656 media_image2.png Greyscale . See claim 1 limitation. The structure of compound 3 of Ye et.al., that is PNG media_image1.png 386 658 media_image1.png Greyscale , and the compound of claim 1, differ structurally by the compound of claim 1 having an N-(2-difluoromethoxy)ethyl and a pyrimidine substituent groups in combination with the bicyclic methyl-1H-indazol-7-yl core. Moreover, as demonstrated in the examined specification the introduction of these substituent groups in combination with the bicyclic core lead to an improvement in cAMP activity in an A BRET hGPR88 receptor Assay from 228 nM to 47 nM. See examined specification page 8 lines 1 – 10 and Table 1. Thus, prior art compound 3 fails to anticipate or render obvious the compound of claim 1. Therefore, claims 1 – 3 are free of the prior art. Furthermore, claims 4 – 5 which depend on the compound of claim 1 which is free of the prior art; is also free of the prior art. Conclusion Claims 1 – 5 are rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAWANNA S WHITE whose telephone number is (703)756-4687. The examiner can normally be reached 7:00 am - 5:00 pm [EST] M - Th. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kortney Klinkel can be reached at 571-270-5239. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAWANNA SHAR-DAY WHITE/Examiner, Art Unit 1627
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740953
COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING HDAC INHIBITORS AND RETINOIDS
4y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12740964
USE OF PHTHALIDE COMPOUNDS IN TREATMENT OF MENINGIOMA
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735401
SOLID STATE FORMS OF DANICOPAN AND PROCESS THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12715856
COMPOUNDS USEFUL AS IMMUNOMODULATORS
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12702669
COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CANCER
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+23.3%)
3y 5m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 120 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month