Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/952,237

LENS DRIVING DEVICE CAPABLE OF REDUCING ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE AND IMPROVING ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE

Non-Final OA §102§Other
Filed
Nov 19, 2024
Priority
Mar 13, 2019 — RE 10-2019-0028663 +2 more
Examiner
LAVARIAS, ARNEL C
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Innotek Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
673 granted / 844 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +0% lift
Without
With
+0.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
857
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
40.6%
+0.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.7%
-11.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 844 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §Other
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 17/430212, filed on 8/11/2021. Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for priority under 35 U.S.C. 120. Drawings The originally filed drawings were received on 11/19/2024. These drawings are acceptable. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Park et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2016/0216529 A1). Park et al. discloses a lens driving device (See for example Abstract; Figures 1-13) comprising a housing (See for example 140 in Figure1); a bobbin (See for example 110 in Figure 1) disposed in the housing; a coil (See for example 120 in Figure 1) disposed on the bobbin; a first magnet (See for example 130 in Figure 1) disposed on the housing and facing the coil; and an elastic member (See for example 150 in Figure 1) coupled with the bobbin and the housing. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 1 is allowable over the cited art of record for at least the reason that the cited art of record fails to teach or reasonably suggest a lens driving device as generally set forth in Claim 1, the device including, in combination with the features recited in Claim 1, an adhesive fixing the upper elastic member to the housing, wherein the housing comprises an upper surface facing the upper plate of the cover and a groove formed on the upper surface of the housing, wherein the upper elastic member comprises a hole disposed at a position corresponding with the groove of the housing, and wherein at least a portion of the adhesive is disposed in the groove of the housing. Claims 2-15 are dependent on Claim 1, and hence are allowable for at least the same reasons Claim 1 is allowable. Claim 16 is allowable over the cited art of record for at least the reason that the cited art of record fails to teach or reasonably suggest a lens driving device as generally set forth in Claim 16, the device including, in combination with the features recited in Claim 16, an adhesive fixing the elastic member to the housing, wherein the housing comprises a groove formed on the housing, wherein the elastic member comprises a hole disposed at a position corresponding with the groove of the housing, and wherein at least a portion of the adhesive is disposed in the groove of the housing. Claims 17-19 are dependent on Claim 16, and hence are allowable for at least the same reasons Claim 16 is allowable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent No. 12176145 to Son et al.- Lens driving device for optical image stabilization and lens autofocusing, and parent application to the instant application. U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2018/0031858 A1 to Gomyo et al.- Lens driving device for optical image stabilization and lens autofocusing, utilizing leaf springs and suspension wires. U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2019/0243087 A1 to Osaka et al.- Lens driving device for optical image stabilization and lens autofocusing. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARNEL C LAVARIAS whose telephone number is (571)272-2315. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10:30 AM-7 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone Allen can be reached at 571-272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ARNEL C. LAVARIAS Primary Examiner Group Art Unit 2872 7/15/2026 /ARNEL C LAVARIAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704717
COMPOSITE PANE WITH A HOLOGRAPHIC ELEMENT AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702978
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING A BODILY SAMPLE
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12693508
OPTICAL SYSTEM AND MICROSCOPIC OBJECTIVE HAVING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693507
MICROSCOPE OBJECTIVE LENS, MICROSCOPE OPTICAL SYSTEM, AND MICROSCOPE DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687661
MULTI-LAYER FILM FOR FOG-FREE MIRROR
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+0.3%)
2y 10m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 844 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month