Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/952,491

FUEL VAPOR PROCESSING DEVICE AND COMPONENT UNIT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 19, 2024
Priority
Dec 11, 2023 — JP 2023-208127
Examiner
MOUBRY, JAMES G
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Suzuki Motor Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
673 granted / 850 resolved
+9.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
860
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
73.8%
+33.8% vs TC avg
§102
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 850 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is responsive to the Amendment filed December 15, 2025 (herein referred to as “Amendment”). Claims 1-8 are pending and have been fully considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 7, and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Oura (EP 2597020 A1). Regarding Claims 1 and 8, Oura discloses a fuel vapor processing device for a straddle-type vehicle (10) equipped with an engine (25) and a fuel tank (45) (see Abstract, Figure 1), wherein the fuel vapor processing device includes a canister (56) configured to adsorb fuel vapor generated in the fuel tank (see paragraphs [0007], [0035]), and an intake system component configured to form a part of an intake passage of the engine (see paragraphs [0024] - [0026], engine intake system (50) having an air-fuel mixture supply device (48) that includes a throttle body). Further, Oura discloses that the device includes a purge valve (68) configured to release the fuel vapor toward the intake passage (see paragraph [0034]), a first hose (64A) configured to connect the canister (56) and the purge valve (68) (see paragraph [0034]), and a second hose (64B) configured to connect the purge valve (68) and the intake system component (48), wherein the purge valve (68) is attached to the intake system component (48) via the second hose (64B) (see Figure 5, paragraph [0034]). Regarding Claim 7, Oura discloses that the engine (25) is disposed inside a vehicle frame (generally (15), see Figure 2), and the vehicle frame behind the engine is a body frame (see paragraph [0020] for description of frame (15)), and in a side view, a space in front of the body frame for disposing the purge valve (68) is ensured (see Figure 2). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 15, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Specifically, Applicant assets that “Oura does not disclose, teach or suggest the claimed arrangement in which "the purge valve is attached to the intake system component" (see Amendment, page 4). In response, Examiner repeats the statement made by Applicant that “the purge valve (68) is mounted on the mounting bracket (57), which is mounted on the canister (56), and the purge valve (68) is connected to the air-fuel mixture supply device 48 via a second supply hose (64B)”. Therefore, the purge valve is attached to the intake system component (supply device (48) via supply hose (64B). Applicant seems to be arguing that the purge valve of the presently pending claims is coupled directly to intake system component. However, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e., the purge valve being directly coupled to/attached to the intake system component) are not recited in the rejected claim(s). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Therefore, giving the claims the broadest reasonable interpretation in view of the disclosure as provided in MPEP § 2111, Examiner submits that the claims read upon the teachings of Oura as provided herein and the rejections are maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES G MOUBRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5658. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10AM - 6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lindsay M. Low can be reached at 571-272-1196. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRANT MOUBRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2024
Application Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Dec 15, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637989
CAMSHAFT TONE WHEEL, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ENGINE SPEED AND POSITION
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12637972
AMMONIA ENGINE SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12624673
AMMONIA-FUELED ENGINE BASED ON OXYGEN ENHANCEMENT AND AMMONIA-RICH COMBUSTION CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
1y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624667
CONTROL DEVICE FOR HYDROGEN ENGINE
1y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12607154
COKE SCRAPING RING, CYLINDER LINER, CYLINDER, GAS ENGINE AND GAS ENGINE OPERATION METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+13.1%)
2y 2m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 850 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month