Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/952,891

VIBRATION MODULE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 19, 2024
Priority
Feb 07, 2024 — TW 113105080
Examiner
ELNAKIB, AHMED
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Primax Electronics Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
463 granted / 588 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
605
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
80.3%
+40.3% vs TC avg
§102
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 588 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-10 of U.S. Application No. 18952891 filed on 11/19/2024 are presented for examination. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites, “…when the coil layer is electrically conducted, the magnetic element senses the coil layer and vibrates, ...” The first part of the sentence seems to be burbled/directly translated from a foreign language. The second part of the above sentence requires magnetic element that “senses” the coil layer. Magnetic elements does not “sense” coils. Nothing in the disclosure suggest that the magnetic element is equipped with structure, such as a current sensor, that allows for the magnetic element to “sense” the coil element. For examination purposes, the limitations in question are interpreted as, “…when the coil layer conducts electricity, the magnetic element responds the coil layer and vibrates, ... Claims 2-10 are rejected for depending on claim 1. Regarding claim 2: Claim 2 recites the limitation "the fixed portion". There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Further claim 2 defines “a fixing portion”. It is not clear. If the fixing portion , and the fixed portion are the same or different elements. Claims 3-4 are rejected for depending on claim 2. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Closest prior art is Chung et al. (US 2011/0193426). Chung discloses the limitations of claim 1, but does not disclose “a coil layer is disposed within the accommodation space of the housing and aligned with the magnetic element;…” Modifying Chung would require breaking the principle of operation of Chung. That being said. Not of the prior arts, alone or in combination disclose the combination of limitations of claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED ELNAKIB whose telephone number is (571)270-0638. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas Patel can be reached at 571-272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED ELNAKIB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12665473
FIXING STRUCTURE FOR NEUTRAL WIRE AND TEMPERATURE SENSOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665456
SYSTEMS FOR ECCENTRIC ANNULAR COVER FOR STATOR END WINDINGS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12658746
ALTERNATOR WITH ROTOR LAMINATION STACK
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12651980
METHODS AND DEVICES FOR CALIBRATING CAPACITIVE RESONATORS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12644490
MAGNETIC-FOIL BEARING WITH COOLING SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 588 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month