Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/953,621

SKIPLESS TRIGGER SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 20, 2024
Examiner
KLEIN, GABRIEL J
Art Unit
3641
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allow Rate
624 granted / 950 resolved
+13.7% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
981
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 950 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The specification is objected to as failing to provide proper antecedent basis for the claimed subject matter. See 37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and MPEP § 608.01(o). Correction of the following is required. The specification fails to provide proper antecedent basis for the following terms: “trigger housing” and “firing slider.” With respect to claim 1, it is the opinion of the examiner that Applicant intended to recite the term “firing pin” in lieu of “firing slider,” the term “firing pin” finds sufficient antecedent basis in the specification. Correction and/or clarification are required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, line 7, the language reads “a configured to be pushed…trigger housing.” This line appears to include missing language between “a” and “configured.” Further, the language as presented does not make any sense, and the metes bounds of said language are unclear. It is the opinion of the examiner that Applicant intended to recite “a firing pin release configured…trigger housing,” and the claim will be considered as such. Correction and/or clarification are required. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. As allowable subject matter has been indicated, applicant's reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse each requirement not complied with. See 37 CFR 1.111(b) and MPEP § 707.07(a). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: see attached Notice of References Cited. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GABRIEL J KLEIN whose telephone number is (571)272-8229. The examiner can normally be reached 11:30am-8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Troy Chambers can be reached at 571-272-6874. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GABRIEL J. KLEIN Examiner Art Unit 3641 /Gabriel J. Klein/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3641
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12590773
MAGAZINE DISCONNECT MECHANISM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12560397
RIFLE BIPOD ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12560407
TARGET LEAD ESTIMATION BASED ON LAUNCHER SLEW
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12540805
REVERSE-SABOTED SIDEARM SYSTEMS, AND RELATED SIDEARMS, AMMUNITION, AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12540786
MODULAR AR-TYPE SAFETY SELECTOR WITH LEVER MOUNTING PINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+24.1%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 950 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month